Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225619
Summary: Merge Review: bluez-hcidump Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: dwmw2@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: bluez-hcidump
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bluez-hcidump/ Initial Owner: dwmw2@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: bluez-hcidump
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
limb@jcomserv.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |limb@jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From limb@jcomserv.net 2008-02-06 12:19 EST ------- all rpmlint clean, save:
bluez-hcidump.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/bluez-hcidump-1.40/NEWS
Not a problem. Could drop that file.
Source tag should be like:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%%7Bname%7D/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bversion%7D.tar....
Either way, though, the upstream is 404. Might be a problem on upstream's end.
Otherwise, looks good, no other blockers. Any ETA on upgrading to 1.41?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: bluez-hcidump
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619
------- Additional Comments From limb@jcomserv.net 2008-05-16 11:04 EST ------- Any updates?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619
Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2@infradead.org
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2008-09-09 09:18:34 EDT --- Re-evaluated new rahide SRPM, no changes from above mustfixes.
Added current pkg owner to CC.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2008-12-09 14:53:53 EDT --- Any objection to my committing fixes to CVS and closing?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2009-03-31 10:47:06 EDT --- I see we're at 1.42 now.
Now I can grab it with the URL in the spec but not the URL I suggested. Nor can I browse the pacakges on sf.net. Definitely a SF issue.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2010-04-29 16:11:38 EDT --- Ping?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-03-31 12:39:32 EDT --- Now at 2.0. . .
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619
Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2011-06-17 11:49:00
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-06-17 11:49:00 EDT --- Retrying on 2.0-2.
rpmlint clean except for spelling errors and zero-length NEWS. You could remove that, but it's not critical.
Otherwise it's good, the Source URL is good now.
APPROVED.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619
Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org