[Bug 2238593] New: Review Request: library wrapping runit service status - library wrapping runit service status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238593
Bug ID: 2238593 Summary: Review Request: library wrapping runit service status - library wrapping runit service status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mark.e.fuller@gmx.de QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora... SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora... Description: library wrapping runit service status Fedora Account System Username: fuller
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238593
Mark E. Fuller mark.e.fuller@gmx.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2210487 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210487 [Bug 2210487] golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter-1.6.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238593
Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review? Summary|Review Request: library |Review Request: |wrapping runit service |golang-github-prometheus-co |status - library wrapping |mmunity-runit - library |runit service status |wrapping runit service | |status Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |loganjerry@gmail.com CC| |loganjerry@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com --- I will take this review. If you can take one on exchange and aren't scared of OCaml, I could use a review of bug 2238187. If you don't want to touch an OCaml package, I understand. :-)
Fixing the bug name to have the package name in it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238593
Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com --- Looks good. This package is APPROVED.
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. Licenses found: "MIT License", "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 170 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel-0.1.0-1.fc40.noarch.rpm golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-0.1.0-1.fc40.src.rpm ================================================ rpmlint session starts ================================================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpsf57p5o4')] checks: 31, packages: 2
golang-github-prometheus-community-runit.spec: W: no-%build-section golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/.goipath golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/README.md /usr/share/doc/golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel/README.md ================= 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s =================
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 1
golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/.goipath golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/README.md /usr/share/doc/golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel/README.md 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s
Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/archive/v0.1.0/go-runit-0.1... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 19f5a55b65d16a7450f78c8ba47212e4017b19af4ade5ff766f07dde7e024661 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 19f5a55b65d16a7450f78c8ba47212e4017b19af4ade5ff766f07dde7e024661
Requires -------- golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): go-filesystem
Provides -------- golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel: golang(github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit/runit) golang-github-prometheus-community-runit-devel golang-ipath(github.com/prometheus-community/go-runit)
Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2238593 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: Haskell, Ruby, PHP, Java, Ocaml, C/C++, Python, Perl, SugarActivity, R, fonts Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238593
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-prometheus-community-runit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238593
Pat Riehecky riehecky@fnal.gov changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2239710
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239710 [Bug 2239710] golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter-1.6.1 is available
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com