https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
Bug ID: 1806219 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-jingweno-ccat - Colorizing `cat` Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: brandfbb@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/skywalkerz0r/golang-github-jingweno-ccat/m... SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/brandfbb/golang-testing/f... Description: Colorizing `cat` Fedora Account System Username: brandfbb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
Nikola Forró nforro@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nforro@redhat.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |nforro@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
Nikola Forró nforro@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Nikola Forró nforro@redhat.com --- For a start:
* SRPM URL is invalid. I used [1] instead, but please fix it.
* I believe Release tag should be set to "1%{?dist}", not "1%{dist}".
* /usr/bin/ccat is already provided by ccrypt in Fedora.
[1] https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/brandfbb/golang-testing/f...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
--- Comment #2 from Nikola Forró nforro@redhat.com --- Imports in source files refer to "github.com/jingweno/ccat/Godeps/_workspace/". That doesn't seem right and should be fixed, ideally upstream.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
--- Comment #3 from Breno brandfbb@gmail.com --- This spec file was generated with go2rpm. Please see here[1] for more information.
However, I found interesting the fact that we already have a ccat. I need to see how to procedure in this case.
Please, check [1] and meanwhile I will see if I will have to give up having this package on fedora.
1 https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
--- Comment #4 from Nikola Forró nforro@redhat.com ---
This spec file was generated with go2rpm.
I'm aware, but that doesn't make any of my points invalid. In fact, go2rpm on my end generates: "Release: 1%{?dist}"
However, I found interesting the fact that we already have a ccat. I need to see how to procedure in this case.
You can rename the binary, or you can convince ccrypt to rename theirs (perhaps they would be ok with it, since AFAICS ccat is just a convenience alias to ccrypt --cat). I don't think there is any other option, as ccat from ccrypt has a completely different purpose, so you can't use alternatives or similar mechanism to deal with the conflict.
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review
Nikola Forró nforro@redhat.com has canceled Package Review package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org's request for Nikola Forró nforro@redhat.com's needinfo: Bug 1806219: Review Request: golang-github-jingweno-ccat - Colorizing `cat` https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
--- Comment #6 from Nikola Forró nforro@redhat.com --- Breno, are you still interested in packaging this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
Nikola Forró nforro@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(nforro@redhat.com |needinfo?(brandfbb@gmail.co |) |m)
--- Comment #6 from Nikola Forró nforro@redhat.com --- Breno, are you still interested in packaging this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
Breno brandfbb@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(brandfbb@gmail.co | |m) |
--- Comment #7 from Breno brandfbb@gmail.com --- Hey, I really missed this one. I will review the spec file and send it to you again Nikola. Thanks for the reminder. Life's been busy.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806219
Breno brandfbb@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Last Closed| |2021-11-19 03:42:11
--- Comment #8 from Breno brandfbb@gmail.com --- I won't build this package anymore.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org