https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
Bug ID: 2249852 Summary: Review Request: extrae - Parallel runtime instrumentation framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: benson_muite@emailplus.org QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/extrae/fedora-rawh... srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/extrae/fedora-rawh...
description: A dynamic instrumentation package to trace programs compiled and run with the shared memory model (like OpenMP and pthreads), the message passing (MPI) programming model or both programming models (different MPI processes using OpenMP or pthreads within each MPI process). **Extrae** generates trace files that can be later visualized with **Paraver**.
fas: fed500
koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109072343
Reproducible: Always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://tools.bsc.es/extrae
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6639205 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dave.love@manchester.ac.uk Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |dave.love@manchester.ac.uk
--- Comment #2 from Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk --- As for paraver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
--- Comment #3 from Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org --- Thanks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk --- The build fails %check with errors like this:
FAIL: check_clock_sleep =======================
Executed sleep (4) but we measured 4013089021 nanoseconds Comparison of timing in microseconds do not match! (4000 != 4013) FAIL check_clock_sleep (exit status: 1)
As for paraver, would you be willing to maintain it for EPEL? I didn't immediately understand the build failures.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
--- Comment #5 from Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk --- I should have said the test failure is in tests/src/tracer/clocks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(benson_muite@emai | |lplus.org)
--- Comment #6 from Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk --- Will you look at the test failure? (I suspect it can just be elided, but the score-p people would probably comment helpfully.)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai | |lplus.org) |
--- Comment #7 from Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org --- Checking the test failure. EPEL is a little lower priority for me at present, though can add in future. [fedora-review-service-build]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6985693 (failed)
Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.
- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
Xavier Bachelot xavier@bachelot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier@bachelot.org Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(dave.love@manches | |ter.ac.uk) |
--- Comment #10 from Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk --- Sorry to have ignored this. I think I hadn't seen the new package. I'll have a look at it when I get a chance.
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review
Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk has canceled Package Review package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org's request for Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk's needinfo: Bug 2249852: Review Request: extrae - Parallel runtime instrumentation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249852
--- Comment #10 from Dave Love dave.love@manchester.ac.uk --- Sorry to have ignored this. I think I hadn't seen the new package. I'll have a look at it when I get a chance.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com