Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: glade - User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806093
Summary: Review Request: glade - User Interface Designer for
GTK+ and GNOME
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kalevlember(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Spec URL:
http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/glade.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/glade-3.11.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description:
Glade is a RAD tool to enable quick and easy development of user interfaces for
the GTK+ toolkit and the GNOME desktop environment.
The user interfaces designed in Glade are saved as XML, which can be used in
numerous programming languages including C, C++, C#, Vala, Java, Perl, Python,
and others.
-----------------------------------------
This is the GTK+ 3 version of Glade.
During the gtk3 development cycle, upstream renamed 'glade3' to 'glade',
to
make the gtk2 and gtk3 versions parallel installable. 'glade3' is the gtk2
version and 'glade' is the gtk3 version. Confusingly enough,
in Fedora we have the gtk3 version in 'glade3' package and don't have the
gtk2
version packaged up at all.
This package is the first step in getting back in line with upstream naming.
Upstream blog post about the rename:
http://blogs.gnome.org/tvb/2011/01/15/the-glade-dl/
Various tickets opened in Fedora bugzilla about providing both glade and
glade3:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708834
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717763
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731227
P.S. I'm not yet sure how it's best to name the gtk2 compat package: should it
be 'glade3' like upstream is calling it, or should it be 'glade-gtk2' for
clarity? The latter would likely also involve renaming /us
r/bin/glade-3 to /usr/bin/glade-gtk2 as a downstream distro modification, so
I'm not sure we'd want to take that route.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.