[Bug 1534116] New: Review Request: python-rasterio - Fast and direct raster I/O for use with Numpy and SciPy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
Bug ID: 1534116 Summary: Review Request: python-rasterio - Fast and direct raster I/O for use with Numpy and SciPy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.analyst@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-rasterio.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//python-rasterio-1.0a12-1.fc27.src.rpm
Description: Rasterio reads and writes geospatial raster data. Geographic information systems use GeoTIFF and other formats to organize and store gridded, or raster, datasets. Rasterio reads and writes these formats and provides a Python API based on ND arrays.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1534110, 1534113
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com --- Feel free to review, but still waiting on some deps first.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534110 [Bug 1534110] Review Request: python-affine - Matrices describing affine transformation of the plane https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534113 [Bug 1534113] Review Request: python-snuggs - Snuggs are s-expressions for Numpy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zebob.m@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com --- Let me know once the deps are in Koji.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com --- koji build is now done: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24223398
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
--- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com --- Oops, forgot to update the srpm before building on koji; here's the correct build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24223632
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |zebob.m@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com --- Package approved.
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 288 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-rasterio/review-python- rasterio/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 102400 bytes in 8 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-rasterio , python3-rasterio [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-rasterio-1.0a12-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm python3-rasterio-1.0a12-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm python-rasterio-debuginfo-1.0a12-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm python-rasterio-debugsource-1.0a12-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm python-rasterio-1.0a12-1.fc28.src.rpm python2-rasterio.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geospatial -> spatial python2-rasterio.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gridded -> griddle, derided python2-rasterio.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US datasets -> data sets, data-sets, databases python3-rasterio.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geospatial -> spatial python3-rasterio.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gridded -> griddle, derided python3-rasterio.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US datasets -> data sets, data-sets, databases python3-rasterio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rio python-rasterio-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation python-rasterio.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geospatial -> spatial python-rasterio.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gridded -> griddle, derided python-rasterio.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US datasets -> data sets, data-sets, databases 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116 Bug 1534116 depends on bug 1534113, which changed state.
Bug 1534113 Summary: Review Request: python-snuggs - Snuggs are s-expressions for Numpy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534113
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116 Bug 1534116 depends on bug 1534110, which changed state.
Bug 1534110 Summary: Review Request: python-affine - Matrices describing affine transformation of the plane https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534110
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rasterio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-rasterio-1.0a12-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-eb0a77eac2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-rasterio-1.0a12-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-eb0a77eac2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534116
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2018-03-06 12:24:59
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-rasterio-1.0a12-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com