https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979332
Bug ID: 979332 Summary: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here> Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jmlich@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://jmlich.fedorapeople.org/libpqtypes.spec SRPM URL: http://jmlich.fedorapeople.org/libpqtypes-1.5.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Software extension to the PostgreSQL libpq interface Fedora Account System Username: jmlich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979332
Jozef Mlich jmlich@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: <main |Review Request: libpqtypes |package name here> - <short |- Software extension to the |summary here> |PostgreSQL libpq interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979332
--- Comment #1 from Jozef Mlich jmlich@redhat.com --- This is my first package and you need a sponsor. I did my homework http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5553430
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979332
Volker Fröhlich volker27@gmx.at changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |volker27@gmx.at Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979332
--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich volker27@gmx.at --- The .so symlink belongs into the devel sub-package.
Please include AUTHORS and ChangeLog as documentation.
Commonly the %package and %description sections are all before the prep section.
Your build appends -O3 to the Fedora flags. To my knowledge, that results in O3 being used.
The group seems wrong to me, as this is no application.
You've got two percent signs in from of description devel!
Use the name and version macro in Source0 and potentially in the files section.
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is obsolete and can be removed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979332
Jozef Mlich jmlich@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #3 from Jozef Mlich jmlich@redhat.com --- I am already member of "Fedora Packager GIT Commit Group" so I do not need a sponsor.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979332
--- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volker27@gmx.at --- (In reply to Jozef Mlich from comment #1)
This is my first package and you need a sponsor.
What's that about then?
I have no idea what group that is, but I can't see it via FAS.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979332
--- Comment #5 from Jozef Mlich jmlich@redhat.com --- (In reply to Volker Fröhlich from comment #4)
(In reply to Jozef Mlich from comment #1)
This is my first package and you need a sponsor.
What's that about then?
I have no idea what group that is, but I can't see it via FAS.
I am sorry, I am not very familiar with all processes in Fedora. I followed tutorial 'how to add new package into fedora'. My mentor in Red Hat explained me, I do not need mentor any more.
I need just review for package.
(In reply to Volker Fröhlich from comment #2)
The .so symlink belongs into the devel sub-package.
Please include AUTHORS and ChangeLog as documentation.
Commonly the %package and %description sections are all before the prep section.
The group seems wrong to me, as this is no application.
You've got two percent signs in from of description devel!
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is obsolete and can be removed.
These should be fixed right now.
Your build appends -O3 to the Fedora flags. To my knowledge, that results in O3 being used.
I have sent this request to upstream developer.
Use the name and version macro in Source0 and potentially in the files section.
The URL (in Source 0) depends also on pgfoundry release_id. I am not sure if is good practice to use here this macro, because you can get wrong url afterwards.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979332
Michael Schwendt mschwendt@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |dan@danny.cz
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt mschwendt@gmail.com --- Your sponsor needs to be the one to review and approve your first package review request. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer
I've looked up your account in FAS and found Dan Horák is your sponsor.
This is no full review, just a very brief look at the spec file:
Group: Development/Libraries
"System Environment/Libraries" has been the group for run-time library base packages since many years.
Requires: postgresql%{?_isa} >= 8.4
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
%changelog
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979332
Dan Horák dan@danny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2018-01-22 03:53:36
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org