Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: snmpcheck - An utility to get information via SNMP protocols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Summary: Review Request: snmpcheck - An utility to get information via SNMP protocols Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lystor@lystor.org.ua QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://repo.lystor.org.ua/fedora/12/SPECS/snmpcheck.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.lystor.org.ua/fedora/12/SRPMS/snmpcheck-1.7-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: snmpcheck supports the following enumerations: * Contact * Description * Devices * Domain * Hardware and storage informations * Hostname * IIS statistics * IP forwarding * Listening UDP ports * Location * Motd * Mountpoints * Network interfaces * Network services * Processes * Routing information * Software components (Windows programs or RPMs etc.) * System Uptime * TCP connections * Total Memory * Uptime * User accounts * Web server informations (IIS)
$ rpmlint {i386,x86_64,SRPMS}/snmpcheck* snmpcheck.noarch: W: no-documentation snmpcheck.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
The software has no documentation.
This package builds successfully by mock on i686/x86_64 architectures.
This is one from my first packages and I'm looking for a sponsor.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Nikolay Ulyanitsky lystor@lystor.org.ua changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Nikolay Ulyanitsky lystor@lystor.org.ua changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |566407
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
--- Comment #1 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky lystor@lystor.org.ua 2010-02-19 04:42:56 EST --- Builds successfully in mock on Fedora 11 with i386/x86_64 architectures.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
--- Comment #2 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky lystor@lystor.org.ua 2010-02-19 07:53:06 EST --- Builds successfully in mock on Fedora 13 with i386/x86_64 architectures.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian@bernewireless.net Blocks| |563471(FE-SECLAB), | |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Bug 566410 depends on bug 566407, which changed state.
Bug 566407 Summary: Review Request: perl-Number-Bytes-Human - Convert byte count to human readable format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566407
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net 2010-07-02 16:25:00 EDT --- Added the "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" blocker because it's your first package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
--- Comment #4 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky lystor@lystor.org.ua 2010-07-04 11:39:37 EDT ---
Added the "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" blocker because it's your first package.
I am already sponsored :) https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/lystor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net 2010-07-04 12:12:36 EDT --- My bad, sorry.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
--- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net 2010-11-02 07:30:34 EDT --- It seems that nobody has picked this review request. Are you still interested in maintaining this package in Fedora?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
--- Comment #7 from Nikolay Ulyanitsky lystor@lystor.org.ua 2010-11-02 12:16:04 EDT ---
It seems that nobody has picked this review request. Are you still interested
in maintaining this package in Fedora?
Hi Fabian Yes, of course.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |fabian@bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net 2010-12-27 05:28:20 EST --- Hmmm, the source is no longer available.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rebus@seznam.cz Alias| |snmpcheck
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
--- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net 2011-02-08 08:50:30 EST --- The latest release of snmpcheck is 1.8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|fabian@bernewireless.net |nobody@fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Ruediger Landmann r.landmann@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |r.landmann@redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(lystor@lystor.org | |.ua)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
--- Comment #10 from Ruediger Landmann r.landmann@redhat.com 2011-03-20 19:58:40 EDT --- Nikolay, could you please generate a new spec and SRPM with the currently-available source?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |StalledSubmitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lystor@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #11 from Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz 2012-01-22 16:56:55 EST --- SPEC: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/snmpcheck.spec SRPM: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/snmpcheck-1.8-1.fc16.src.rpm
Hi, seems Nikolay is too busy. I can continue with this one. Here are the links to SPEC and SRPM updated for the version 1.8
Best regards Michal Ambroz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566410
--- Comment #12 from Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz 2012-01-22 20:04:32 EST --- SPEC: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/snmpcheck.spec SRPM: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/snmpcheck-1.8-2.fc16.src.rpm
Added manpage.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org