Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: cxtools - A collection of general-purpose C++ classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
Summary: cxtools - A collection of general-purpose C++ classes Product: Fedora Version: 17 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgansser@alice.de QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: ---
cxtools, a collection of general-purpose C++ classes, needed for vdr-live VDR plugin.
Bugreport updstream: zero-length /usr/share/doc/cxxtools-2.1/NEWS # https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3525604&group_id=12...
Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/cxxtools/cxxtools.spec?a=P...
SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/cxxtools/cxxtools-2.1-1.fc...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint cxxtools-2.1-1.fc17.src.rpm cxxtools.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint cxxtools-2.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm cxxtools.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US cxxtools.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/cxxtools-2.1/NEWS 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
MartinKG mgansser@alice.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
MartinKG mgansser@alice.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |821224
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Summary|cxtools - A collection of |cxxtools - A collection of |general-purpose C++ classes |general-purpose C++ classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ville.skytta@iki.fi Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta@iki.fi Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi --- Looks like 2.1.1 is available.
Run unit tests during build, e.g. like this between %install and %clean: %check test/alltests
URL should probably be http://www.tntnet.org/cxxtools.html
Be consistent with the Group tag, either add one for the main package or remove it from -devel too.
%{?_isa} missing from -devel's main package dep: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
# FIXME: really? re-check!
Please re-check the license and remove the above comment when done.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/ ?func=detail&aid=3525604&group_id=124828&atid=700758
That's not a bug, just leave the file out from the package if it's empty.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
MartinKG mgansser@alice.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Assignee|ville.skytta@iki.fi |nobody@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #2 from MartinKG mgansser@alice.de --- SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/cxxtools/cxxtools-2.1.1-1....
Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/cxxtools/cxxtools.spec?a=j...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint cxxtools-2.1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm cxxtools.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint cxxtools-2.1.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm cxxtools.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint cxxtools-debuginfo-2.1.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm cxxtools-debuginfo.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint cxxtools-devel-2.1.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm cxxtools-devel.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US cxxtools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation cxxtools-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cxxtools-config 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta@iki.fi
--- Comment #3 from Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi --- Will look into this later, but please don't touch the status or assigned to fields between package revisions unless you want a new reviewer.
As noted in bug 819237 comment 9, please also re-fix your rpmlint/enchant config and keep it fixed by installing the hunspell-en package.
One common and useful practice between package revisions is to post the changelog after the previous release into the review bug. There's no need to repeatedly post the rpmlint output if it contains nothing of interest (such as in comment 2).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi --- Looks fine otherwise, but there's a bundled MD5 implementation in src/md5.c which looks like the Polstra one to me - if that's correct, should add:
Provides: bundled(md5-polstra)
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries for more info.
Approved - no need to submit a new package here just to fix this if you don't want, but please be sure to fix it before the first build you submit to koji.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #5 from MartinKG mgansser@alice.de --- %changelog * Mon May 28 2012 Martin Gansser linux4martin@gmx.de - 2.1.1-2 - added Provides: bundled(md5-polstra)
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: cxxtools Short Description: A collection of general-purpose C++ classes Owners: martinkg Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi --- Remember to set the fedora-cvs flag whenever making SCM requests...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
MartinKG mgansser@alice.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2012-05-29 13:14:29
--- Comment #8 from MartinKG mgansser@alice.de --- the package built successfully on koji
fc18-candidate: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4112594
f17-candidate: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4112762
f16-candidate: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4112807
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- cxxtools-2.1.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cxxtools-2.1.1-2.fc17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- cxxtools-2.1.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cxxtools-2.1.1-2.fc16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt mschwendt@gmail.com --- Both updates for F17 and F16 are still "pending", so they are not available and won't be published ever. You need to request a push to "testing".
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #12 from MartinKG mgansser@alice.de --- cxxtools was pushed to testing http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/17/x86_64/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- cxxtools-2.1.1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- cxxtools-2.1.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
MartinKG mgansser@alice.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|17 |rawhide Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from MartinKG mgansser@alice.de --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cxxtools New Branches: f18 Owners: martinkg InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- f18 branch exists.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- cxxtools-2.2-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cxxtools-2.2-1.fc18
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- cxxtools-2.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cxxtools-2.2-1.fc19
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #19 from Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi --- No need to reference this bug in updates, the package has been in the repos for a long time already.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
MartinKG mgansser@alice.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #20 from MartinKG mgansser@alice.de --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cxxtools New Branches: fc23 devel Owners: martinkg InitialCC:
[please untire cxxtools, because package vdr-lieve depends on it]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- This SCM request method has been deprecated. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821220
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org