Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265
Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul@city-fan.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libxml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libxml-1.8.17-14.src.rpm
Description:
This library allows old Gnome-1 applications to manipulate XML files.
This package was removed from Core for FC6 and I am submitting it to Extras to support the people that still need it for legacy applications. I used recent rawhide SRPM and then tweaked it for Extras and to suit my own cosmetic preferences. Reviewers may consider using rpmdiff to compare the built packages with the versions in Fedora Core 5.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265
paul@city-fan.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198244 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |kevin@tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2006-09-09 23:14 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 53846294aa850a7d042948176d1d19dc libxml-1.8.17.tar.gz 53846294aa850a7d042948176d1d19dc libxml-1.8.17.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. See below - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock.
Issues:
1. If the license is LGPL (as it appears to be), no need to include the COPYING file as that is the GPL.
2. The devel package has: Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version} That should probibly be: Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
3. rpmlint says: E: libxml-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: libxml-devel no-documentation
I think those can both be ignored in this case.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265
------- Additional Comments From paul@city-fan.org 2006-09-11 06:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1)
Issues:
- If the license is LGPL (as it appears to be), no need to include the
COPYING file as that is the GPL.
doc/xml.html says: This library is released both under the W3C Copyright and the GNU LGPL.
The only GPL bits appear to be the buildsystem (e.g. libtool), so I've dropped the COPYING file.
- The devel package has:
Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version} That should probibly be: Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Done.
- rpmlint says:
E: libxml-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: libxml-devel no-documentation
I think those can both be ignored in this case.
I agree.
Next version: Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libxml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libxml-1.8.17-15.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2006-09-11 13:41 EST ------- Excellent. All issues I see are fixed now, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once the package has been imported and built.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265
paul@city-fan.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From paul@city-fan.org 2006-09-11 16:00 EST ------- 17043 (libxml): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/17043-libxm...
owners.list updated, closing bug.
Thanks for the review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libxml - Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libxml- Old |Review Request: libxml - Old |libXML library for Gnome-1 |libXML library for Gnome-1 |application compatibility |application compatibility
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2006-12-21 22:20 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libxml - Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205265
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org