https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
Bug ID: 2235391 Summary: Review Request: vobcopy - Utility to copy DVD .vob files to disk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: davide@cavalca.name QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/vobcopy/vobcopy.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/vobcopy/vobcopy-1.2.1-3.fc40.src.rp...
Description: Vobcopy copies DVD .vob files to disk, decrypting them on the way (thanks to libdvdread and libdvdcss) and merges them into file(s) with the name extracted from the DVD. There is one drawback though: at the moment vobcopy doesn't deal with multi-angle-dvd's. But since these are rather sparse this shouldn't matter much.
Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
--- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105448176
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://github.com/barak/vo | |bcopy
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6349719 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name --- This is based on the corresponding rpmfusion package: https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/vobcopy/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited ---
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/vobcopy/vobcopy.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/vobcopy/vobcopy-1.2.1-3.fc40.src.rp...
Description: Vobcopy copies DVD .vob files to disk via libdvdread and merges them into file(s) with the name extracted from the DVD. There is one drawback though: at the moment vobcopy doesn't deal with multi-angle DVDs. But since these are rather sparse this shouldn't matter much.
Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name --- Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/vobcopy/vobcopy.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/vobcopy/vobcopy-1.2.1-4.fc40.src.rp...
Changelog: - Merge latest changes from rpmfusion - Rework description
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Created attachment 1985680 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1985680&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 6349719 to 6349830
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6349830 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ngompa13@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ngompa13@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review+ Status|NEW |POST
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com --- Review notes:
* Package complies with Fedora Packaging Guidelines * Package builds and installs * Package licensing is correct and license file is correctly installed * No serious issues from rpmlint
PACKAGE APPROVED.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vobcopy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2218117 (MultimediaSIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218117 [Bug 2218117] Tracker for multimedia-sig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-4284e1fa37 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4284e1fa37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-b29ebeafa7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b29ebeafa7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-4284e1fa37 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-4284e1fa37 *` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4284e1fa37
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-b29ebeafa7 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-b29ebeafa7 *` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b29ebeafa7
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2023-09-07 01:28:17
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-b29ebeafa7 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235391
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-4284e1fa37 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org