[Bug 1733707] New: Review Request: multi-git-status - Show uncommitted, untracked and unpushed changes for multiple Git repos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733707
Bug ID: 1733707 Summary: Review Request: multi-git-status - Show uncommitted, untracked and unpushed changes for multiple Git repos Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bexelbie@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://bex.fedorapeople.org/multi-git-status/multi-git-status.spec SRPM URL: https://bex.fedorapeople.org/multi-git-status/multi-git-status-0-1.20190727g... Description: Show uncommitted, untracked and unpushed changes for multiple Git repos.
multi-git-status shows: * Uncommitted changes if there are unstaged or uncommitted changes on the checked out branch. * Untracked files if there are untracked files which are not ignored. * Needs push (BRANCH) if the branch is tracking a (remote) branch which is behind. * Needs upstream (BRANCH) if a branch does not have a local or remote upstream branch configured. Changes in the branch may otherwise never be pushed or merged. * Needs pull (BRANCH) if the branch is tracking a (remote) branch which is ahead. This requires that the local git repo already knows about the remote changes (i.e. you've done a fetch), or that you specify the -f option. Multi-git-status does NOT contact the remote by default. * X stashes if there are stashes.
Fedora Account System Username: bex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733707
Björn 'besser82' Esser besser82@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besser82@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |besser82@fedoraproject.org Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Björn 'besser82' Esser besser82@fedoraproject.org --- Thre package builds fine on Koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36620481
The package lacks the following runtime requirements to function properly:
Requires: coreutils Requires: findutils Requires: gawk Requires: git Requires: sed
Otherwise the package seems fine, but I'll do a full review after the requirements have been fixed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733707
Björn 'besser82' Esser besser82@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733707
--- Comment #2 from Brian (bex) Exelbierd bexelbie@redhat.com --- Thank you, Björn, for catching those Requires. I had on my list to test this in a clean VM and then got distracted by something locally.
The files are updated at the same urls.
I noticed that your suggestions includes a few things like sed that seem to be default installed in Fedora. Is there a good way to catch those, other than looking for them (and focusing on them) in a read of the script?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733707
Benjamin Kircher benjamin.kircher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |benjamin.kircher@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kircher benjamin.kircher@gmail.com --- Installed and played around. Looks good to me.
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bkircher/pkgs/multi- git-status/multi-git-status/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 2 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. [-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
Rpmlint ------- Checking: multi-git-status-0-1.20190727gitb203cca.fc31.noarch.rpm multi-git-status-0-1.20190727gitb203cca.fc31.src.rpm multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unstaged -> unstated, upstaged, unstained multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope, rep, reps multi-git-status.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mgitstatus multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unstaged -> unstated, upstaged, unstained multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope, rep, reps 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "en_US.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "en_US.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unstaged -> unstated, upstaged, unstained multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope, rep, reps multi-git-status.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/fboender/multi-git-status <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> multi-git-status.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mgitstatus 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.
Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/fboender/multi-git-status/archive/b203cca071641928e2be611... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 2e94ceedcd3db10b283381dc4374e63ef2c646cdbe0b353ab02bc018376df6ce CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 2e94ceedcd3db10b283381dc4374e63ef2c646cdbe0b353ab02bc018376df6ce
Requires -------- multi-git-status (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/sh coreutils findutils gawk git sed
Provides -------- multi-git-status: multi-git-status
Generated by fedora-review 0.7.2 (65d36bb) last change: 2019-04-09 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --rpm-spec -n multi-git-status-0-1.20190727gitb203cca.fc30.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: C/C++, Python, Perl, Java, PHP, R, SugarActivity, Haskell, Ocaml, fonts Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733707
--- Comment #4 from Brian (bex) Exelbierd bexelbie@redhat.com --- Updated spec and srpm to reflect a partial move to versioning by the upstream (at my request). With the next release they will use forge releases.
Spec URL: https://bex.fedorapeople.org/multi-git-status/multi-git-status.spec SRPM URL: https://bex.fedorapeople.org/multi-git-status/multi-git-status-1.0-1.2019072... Description: Show uncommitted, untracked and unpushed changes for multiple Git repos.
multi-git-status shows: * Uncommitted changes if there are unstaged or uncommitted changes on the checked out branch. * Untracked files if there are untracked files which are not ignored. * Needs push (BRANCH) if the branch is tracking a (remote) branch which is behind. * Needs upstream (BRANCH) if a branch does not have a local or remote upstream branch configured. Changes in the branch may otherwise never be pushed or merged. * Needs pull (BRANCH) if the branch is tracking a (remote) branch which is ahead. This requires that the local git repo already knows about the remote changes (i.e. you've done a fetch), or that you specify the -f option. Multi-git-status does NOT contact the remote by default. * X stashes if there are stashes.
Fedora Account System Username: bex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733707
Björn 'besser82' Esser besser82@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Björn 'besser82' Esser besser82@fedoraproject.org --- Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/besser82/fedora/review/1733707-multi-git-status/licensecheck.txt
---> License is fine. Expat and MIT are identical licenses.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: multi-git-status-1.0-1.20190728git2e6049d.fc31.noarch.rpm multi-git-status-1.0-1.20190728git2e6049d.fc31.src.rpm multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unstaged -> unstated, upstaged, unstained multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope, rep, reps multi-git-status.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mgitstatus multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unstaged -> unstated, upstaged, unstained multi-git-status.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope, rep, reps 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "de_DE.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "de_DE.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US untracked -> backtracked, tracked multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unpushed -> unpunished, punished, pushed multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repos -> ropes, reps, repose multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unstaged -> unstated, upstaged, unstained multi-git-status.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope, rep, reps multi-git-status.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/fboender/multi-git-status <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> multi-git-status.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mgitstatus 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.
Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/fboender/multi-git-status/archive/2e6049d4286bf26ceabf5c6... : CHECKSUM(SHA512) this package : f441a7288647be6dffb1fc284efecc3579bd3547af80de32caf6264e3f6b22d22f55fad31fa970381208adea80889cd5b0bfab9e94f0fe0026f84f1783837649 CHECKSUM(SHA512) upstream package : f441a7288647be6dffb1fc284efecc3579bd3547af80de32caf6264e3f6b22d22f55fad31fa970381208adea80889cd5b0bfab9e94f0fe0026f84f1783837649
Requires -------- multi-git-status (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/sh coreutils findutils gawk git sed
Provides -------- multi-git-status: multi-git-status
Generated by fedora-review 0.7.2 (65d36bb) last change: 2019-04-09 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -k sha512 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1733707 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, Ocaml, C/C++, Perl, Ruby, fonts, R, PHP, Python, SugarActivity, Haskell Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
===== Solution =====
Package APPROVED!
***
(In reply to Brian (bex) Exelbierd from comment #2)
Thank you, Björn, for catching those Requires. I had on my list to test this in a clean VM and then got distracted by something locally.
The files are updated at the same urls.
I noticed that your suggestions includes a few things like sed that seem to be default installed in Fedora. Is there a good way to catch those, other than looking for them (and focusing on them) in a read of the script?
You're welcome!
Besides checking the script closely for the used commands, one can run the script using `bash -x $script` which will result in verbose console output, listing all commands executed by the script.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733707
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla gwync@protonmail.com --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/multi-git-status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733707
Brian (bex) Exelbierd bexelbie@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2019-08-01 22:25:07
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com