https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
Bug ID: 2176391 Summary: Review Request: vcdimager - VideoCD (pre-)mastering and ripping tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: xavier@bachelot.org QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/vcdimager.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/vcdimager-2.0.1-14.fc39.src.rpm Description: VCDImager allows you to create VideoCD BIN/CUE CD images from MPEG files. These can be burned with cdrdao or any other program capable of burning BIN/CUE files.
Also included is VCDRip which does the reverse operation, that is to rip MPEG streams from images or burned VideoCDs and to show information about a VideoCD.
Fedora Account System Username: xavierb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
Xavier Bachelot xavier@bachelot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC| |ngompa13@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.gnu.org/software | |/vcdimager/
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5613857 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ngompa13@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review? Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com --- Taking this review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com --- Initial spec review:
Requires(post): info Requires(preun): info
This is only needed for EL7. EL8 and newer have file triggers so this should be dropped for them.
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.la" -exec rm -f {} ';'
This should be %{buildroot} for consistency
%post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig
This is only needed for EL7. If you want to have EL7 compatibility, please switch to "%ldconfig_scriptlets libs" instead, so it becomes a no-op on EL8+ and Fedora.
%post for infofile in vcdxrip.info vcdimager.info vcd-info.info; do /sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/${infofile} %{_infodir}/dir 2>/dev/null || : done
%preun if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then for infofile in vcdxrip.info vcdimager.info vcd-info.info; do /sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/${infofile} %{_infodir}/dir \ 2>/dev/null || : done fi
This is only needed for EL7. EL8 and newer have file triggers so this should be dropped for them.
%{_bindir}/* %{_mandir}/man1/*
This kind of globbing is not explicit/specific enough, there's no way to tell if the package may add conflicting binaries.
Cf. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_explicit_lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot xavier@bachelot.org --- Thanks Neal.
All fixed in : Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/vcdimager.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/vcdimager-2.0.1-15.fc39.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com --- Oh I missed one...
License: GPLv2+
This needs to be "GPL-2.0-or-later" now.
Cf. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuideline...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com ---
%{_mandir}/man1/cdxa2mpeg.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/vcd-info.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/vcdimager.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/vcdxbuild.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/vcdxgen.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/vcdxminfo.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/vcdxrip.1.gz
Please use "1*" here, because we don't guarantee gzipped man pages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Created attachment 1949028 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949028&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5613857 to 5614851
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5614851 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot xavier@bachelot.org --- Fixed License: to use SPDX and manpages to use a glob instead of fixed .gz.
Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/vcdimager.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/vcdimager-2.0.1-16.fc39.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Created attachment 1949047 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949047&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5614851 to 5614984
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5614984 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com --- This looks great now.
PACKAGE APPROVED.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vcdimager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-706a02d681 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-706a02d681
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-967aa197e2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-967aa197e2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-bbd85c941a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-bbd85c941a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-0b053c84b8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0b053c84b8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c71897b5ef has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c71897b5ef
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Last Closed| |2023-03-13 00:17:43
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-706a02d681 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c71897b5ef has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-bbd85c941a has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-0b053c84b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176391
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-967aa197e2 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org