[Bug 1444634] New: Review Request: openvdb - C++ library for sparse volumetric data discretized on three-dimensional grids
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Bug ID: 1444634 Summary: Review Request: openvdb - C++ library for sparse volumetric data discretized on three-dimensional grids Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: negativo17@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/openvdb.spec SRPM URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/openvdb-4.0.1-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: OpenVDB is an Academy Award-winning open-source C++ library comprising a novel hierarchical data structure and a suite of tools for the efficient storage and manipulation of sparse volumetric data discretized on three-dimensional grids. It is developed and maintained by DreamWorks Animation for use in volumetric applications typically encountered in feature film production.
Fedora Account System Username: slaanesh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #1 from Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19155496
Required for OpenVDB integration in Blender.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Sascha Spreitzer sspreitz@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sspreitz@redhat.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |sspreitz@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Luya Tshimbalanga luya@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luya@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #2 from Luya Tshimbalanga luya@fedoraproject.org --- Based on the review
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues to fix: ============== - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: These BR are not needed: make See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 67993600 bytes in 2648 files. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation
===== MUST items =====
C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* MPL (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "MPL (v2.0) BSD (3 clause)". 27 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/luya/Documents/fedora- packaging/review/1444634-openvdb/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in openvdb- libs , openvdb-debuginfo [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 68751360 bytes in /usr/share openvdb-devel-4.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm:68628480 See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Guid... [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: openvdb-4.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm openvdb-libs-4.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm openvdb-devel-4.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm openvdb-python-4.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm openvdb-debuginfo-4.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm openvdb-4.0.1-1.fc27.src.rpm openvdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) volumetric -> cliometric openvdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) discretized -> discretion, discrete, discreet openvdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US volumetric -> cliometric openvdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US discretized -> discretion, discrete, discreet openvdb.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib openvdb.x86_64: W: no-documentation openvdb.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary vdb_render openvdb.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary vdb_view openvdb.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary vdb_print openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US volumetric -> cliometric openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US discretized -> discretion, discrete, discreet openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/openvdb-libs/CHANGES openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib openvdb-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US volumetric -> cliometric openvdb-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US discretized -> discretion, discrete, discreet openvdb-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation openvdb-python.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb-python.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) volumetric -> cliometric openvdb.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) discretized -> discretion, discrete, discreet openvdb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US volumetric -> cliometric openvdb.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US discretized -> discretion, discrete, discreet 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 26 warnings.
Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: openvdb-debuginfo-4.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory openvdb-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US volumetric -> cliometric openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US discretized -> discretion, discrete, discreet openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopenvdb.so.4.0.1 /lib64/libboost_thread.so.1.63.0 openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopenvdb.so.4.0.1 /lib64/libboost_python.so.1.63.0 openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopenvdb.so.4.0.1 /lib64/libboost_regex.so.1.63.0 openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopenvdb.so.4.0.1 /lib64/libboost_chrono.so.1.63.0 openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopenvdb.so.4.0.1 /lib64/libboost_date_time.so.1.63.0 openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopenvdb.so.4.0.1 /lib64/libboost_atomic.so.1.63.0 openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopenvdb.so.4.0.1 /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0 openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/openvdb-libs/CHANGES openvdb-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US volumetric -> cliometric openvdb-python.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US discretized -> discretion, discrete, discreet openvdb-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation openvdb-python.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb-python.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) volumetric -> cliometric openvdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) discretized -> discretion, discrete, discreet openvdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US volumetric -> cliometric openvdb.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US discretized -> discretion, discrete, discreet openvdb.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib openvdb.x86_64: W: no-documentation openvdb.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary vdb_print openvdb.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary vdb_render openvdb.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary vdb_view 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 29 warnings.
Requires -------- openvdb-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libopenvdb.so.4.0()(64bit) openvdb(x86-64)
openvdb-libs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig libHalf.so.12()(64bit) libblosc.so.1()(64bit) libboost_atomic.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_chrono.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_date_time.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_iostreams.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_python.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_regex.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_system.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_thread.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libtbb.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)
openvdb-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
openvdb-python (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libGL.so.1()(64bit) libGLU.so.1()(64bit) libHalf.so.12()(64bit) libXcursor.so.1()(64bit) libXi.so.6()(64bit) libXinerama.so.1()(64bit) libXrandr.so.2()(64bit) libblosc.so.1()(64bit) libboost_atomic.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_chrono.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_date_time.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_iostreams.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_python.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_regex.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_system.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_thread.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libglfw.so.3()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libtbb.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0)(64bit) openvdb(x86-64) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH)
openvdb (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libGL.so.1()(64bit) libGLU.so.1()(64bit) libHalf.so.12()(64bit) libIex-2_2.so.12()(64bit) libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit) libIlmThread-2_2.so.12()(64bit) libXcursor.so.1()(64bit) libXi.so.6()(64bit) libXinerama.so.1()(64bit) libXrandr.so.2()(64bit) libblosc.so.1()(64bit) libboost_atomic.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_chrono.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_date_time.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_iostreams.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_python.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_regex.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_system.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libboost_thread.so.1.63.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libglfw.so.3()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libtbb.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)
Provides -------- openvdb-devel: openvdb-devel openvdb-devel(x86-64)
openvdb-libs: libopenvdb.so.4.0()(64bit) openvdb-libs openvdb-libs(x86-64)
openvdb-debuginfo: openvdb-debuginfo openvdb-debuginfo(x86-64)
openvdb-python: openvdb-python openvdb-python(x86-64)
openvdb: openvdb openvdb(x86-64)
Unversioned so-files -------------------- openvdb-python: /usr/lib64/python2.7/pyopenvdb.so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #3 from Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com --- (In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #2)
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: These BR are not needed: make See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
Fixed.
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 67993600 bytes in 2648 files. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation
[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 68751360 bytes in /usr/share openvdb-devel-4.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm:68628480
Moved to noarch doc subpackage.
[!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
It's already done with %make_build:
openvdb.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
This actually was an issue with an interim Fedora update, it has disappeared.
openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopenvdb.so.4.0.1 /lib64/libboost_thread.so.1.63.0
Fixed.
openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/openvdb-libs/CHANGES
Fixed.
Spec URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/openvdb.spec SRPM URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc25.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|sspreitz@redhat.com |luya@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Luya Tshimbalanga luya@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Luya Tshimbalanga luya@fedoraproject.org --- (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #3)
(In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #2)
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: These BR are not needed: make See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
Fixed.
Checked.
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 67993600 bytes in 2648 files. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation
[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 68751360 bytes in /usr/share openvdb-devel-4.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm:68628480
Moved to noarch doc subpackage.
\Checked.
[!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
It's already done with %make_build:
openvdb.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id openvdb.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
This actually was an issue with an interim Fedora update, it has disappeared.
That was an odd one and good to hear it is now resolved.
openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopenvdb.so.4.0.1 /lib64/libboost_thread.so.1.63.0
Fixed.
Checked
openvdb-libs.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/openvdb-libs/CHANGES
Fixed.
Checked
After verification, the packege is approved for the repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/openvdb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc26 alembic-1.7.1-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-feb18d14f2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-696f2d0657
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc25 alembic-1.7.1-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3c91fdc860
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc24 alembic-1.7.1-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-44a755a3db
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc25, openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3c91fdc860
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc25 blender-2.78c-4.fc25 openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3c91fdc860
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc24, openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-44a755a3db
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc24 blender-2.78c-4.fc24 openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-44a755a3db
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc26, openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-feb18d14f2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc26 blender-2.78c-4.fc26 openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-feb18d14f2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc25, blender-2.78c-4.fc25, openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3c91fdc860
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc24, blender-2.78c-4.fc24, openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-44a755a3db
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc26, blender-2.78c-4.fc26, openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-feb18d14f2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2017-05-22 20:26:18
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc24, blender-2.78c-4.fc24, openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc25, blender-2.78c-4.fc25, openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444634
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- alembic-1.7.1-3.fc26, blender-2.78c-4.fc26, openvdb-4.0.1-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com