Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: python26-configobj - ConfigObj for Python 2.6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676007
Summary: Review Request: python26-configobj - ConfigObj for Python 2.6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shuff@vecna.org QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/python26-configobj.spec SRPM URL: http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/python26-configobj-4.6.0-1.src.rp... Description: This is a port of the existing python-configobj package (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-configobj), built against Python 2.6. It's intended for EPEL 5 only, since it's unnecessary on RHEL 6 and impossible on RHEL 4.
I have not submitted packages to Fedora or EPEL before; I'm looking for a sponsor.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676007
Steve Huff shuff@vecna.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676007
Steve Traylen steve.traylen@cern.ch changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen@cern.ch
--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen steve.traylen@cern.ch 2011-03-23 11:37:11 EDT --- Hi Steve,
I'd like to see this package appear and can in principal sponsor you. Have you submitted any more packages or provided any informal reviews. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676007
--- Comment #2 from Steve Huff shuff@vecna.org 2011-03-23 12:59:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
I'd like to see this package appear and can in principal sponsor you. Have you submitted any more packages or provided any informal reviews. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
Heya Steve! Thanks for your interest and support.
I haven't submitted any more packages via Bugzilla yet; I wanted to make sure I was following the procedure correctly first. However, if you look in
http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/
you'll see specs and SRPMs for a few more python26-* packages that I rolled up and am waiting to submit.
I'd be happy to perform some package reviews; I see the links for finding them in the document you referenced. When I do reviews, would you prefer that I post links in this ticket, or email you directly, or something else?
thanks, -Steve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676007
--- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen steve.traylen@cern.ch 2011-03-23 14:25:23 EDT --- SteveH, YOu are following the procedure just fine, you just need to do a bit more of it basically. submit a couple more packages.
For informal reviews find what needs reviewing as you did and add your informal reviews as comments to those bugs. Afterwards provide a link in here to build up a case for sponsorship. SteveT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676007
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |Package Review Version|rawhide |el5 Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676007
--- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen steve.traylen@cern.ch 2011-06-08 16:26:24 EDT --- SteveH,
Did you manage to do any reviews?
Steve
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org