Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
Summary: Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.moschny@gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-jinja2.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-jinja2-2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: Jinja2 is a template engine written in pure Python. It provides a Django inspired non-XML syntax but supports inline expressions and an optional sandboxed environment.
If you have any exposure to other text-based template languages, such as Smarty or Django, you should feel right at home with Jinja2. It's both designer and developer friendly by sticking to Python's principles and adding functionality useful for templating environments.
--
Making a new package for version 2 of Jinja as it is not completely backwards compatible to version 1.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
jochen@herr-schmitt.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From jochen@herr-schmitt.de 2008-07-21 15:47 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm. + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm. + Rpmlint is quite on debuginfo rpm. + License is an open source license. + Package contains verbatin copy of the licens. + Usage of rpm macro is consitant. + Package doesn't own files or directories from other packeges + Mock build works fine. + License text seems ok. + Tar ball matches with upstrem (md5sum: 19fe3ee10ee94a6003c53374112f2403) + Local install works fine. + Local uninstall works fine.
*** APPROVED ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
------- Additional Comments From jochen@herr-schmitt.de 2008-07-21 15:50 EST ------- Sorry, In the last moment I have found one complaint:
In the package you use %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
If you may fix this monor isue, you are APPROVED.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
thomas.moschny@gmx.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2008-07-22 12:06 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing!
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-jinja2 Short Description: General purpose template engine Owners: thm Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |jochen@herr-schmitt.de Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-07-22 23:01 EST ------- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
------- Additional Comments From updates@fedoraproject.org 2008-07-24 04:24 EST ------- python-jinja2-2.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
------- Additional Comments From updates@fedoraproject.org 2008-07-24 04:26 EST ------- python-jinja2-2.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2008-08-12 14:24:43 EDT --- python-jinja2-2.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2008-08-12 14:25:32 EDT --- python-jinja2-2.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2008-08-20 17:01:07 EDT --- Closing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |metherid@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com 2011-07-12 08:44:41 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-jinja2 New Branches: el6 Owners: sundaram pjp InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-07-12 23:13:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2011-07-13 05:58:55 EDT --- ???
- python-jinja2 is part of RHEL6 - it would have been nice to ask me beforehand as I'm already maintaining it in EPEL5.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009
--- Comment #13 from Rahul Sundaram metherid@gmail.com 2011-07-13 06:40:55 EDT --- I must have overlooked that. I will get the branch removed
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org