Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461
Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-InsideOut.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-InsideOut-1.00-0.fc5.src.rpm
Description: This is a simple, safe and streamlined toolkit for building inside-out objects. Unlike most other inside-out object building modules already on CPAN, this module aims for minimalism and robustness:
* Does not require derived classes to subclass it * Uses no source filters, attributes or CHECK blocks * Supports any underlying object type including foreign inheritance * Does not leak memory on object destruction * Overloading-safe * Thread-safe for Perl 5.8 or better * mod_perl compatible * Makes no assumption about inheritance or initializer needs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461
Jochen@herr-schmitt.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info |Jochen@herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From Jochen@herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-03 15:31 EST ------- Good: + Tarball match with upstream. + rpmlint doesn't complaints source rpm. + Local build works fine. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license. + rpmlint doesn't complaint the binary rpm.
Bad: - Perl have not to be inclussion in the BR.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461
------- Additional Comments From cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-05 14:08 EST ------- Is the inclusion of perl a blocker for approval? The review guidelines say:
"- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense."
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@iki.fi 2006-07-05 14:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2)
Is the inclusion of perl a blocker for approval?
s/of perl a/of perl in BR a/: no. On the other hand, FWIW, in this case there are various other perl(Foo::Bar) build dependencies which are unlikely to suddenly change so that the main perl package would not be pulled in.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461
Jochen@herr-schmitt.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From Jochen@herr-schmitt.de 2006-07-06 11:53 EST ------- ihave read the Packaging Guidelines again. The packages in the exception list may be listed as a BR optional.
So that this is not a blocker.
I will APPROVED your package now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-InsideOut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197461
cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2006-07-06 23:29 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching +Close bug
Thanks for the review!
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org