[Bug 2183700] New: Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

Bug ID: 2183700
           Summary: Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled
                    systems programming language
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
            Status: NEW
         Component: Package Review
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
        QA Contact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail]
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora

Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/topazus/test/fedora-rawhi...
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/topazus/test/fedora-rawhi...

Description:
Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines
successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its
design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of
priority).

Fedora Account System Username: topazus

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

Jakub Kadlčík  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |https://nim-lang.org/

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík  ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5735135
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Kadlčík  ---
Created attachment 1955094
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1955094&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5735135 to 5735583

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Kadlčík  ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5735583
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík  ---
Created attachment 1956359
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1956359&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5735583 to 5758534

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík  ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5758534
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

dongdigua  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #8 from dongdigua  ---
好耶! great!
I also want nim to be back in Fedora again, thank you.
btw, I'm unretiring nvi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

--- Comment #9 from Felix Wang  ---
(In reply to dongdigua from comment #8)
> 好耶! great!
> I also want nim to be back in Fedora again, thank you.
> btw, I'm unretiring nvi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721

Thanks. As for the nvi unretirement, I have the similar question with Harald
Reindl, since it was little commit history over the last two years,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721#c2

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen  ---
I feel you should base off the old retired package (spec file) please,
unless there is a good/strong reason not to do that.
Then you could also open a PR in pagure for the package unretirement as part of
this review.
I think that would make it easier to review and approve.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nim

Latest upstream version is now 2.0, though 1.6.16 might be okay too for now?

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen  ---
Well maybe not PR, but rather a personal pagure fork anyway.

(In practice rel-eng will revert the last commit when un-retiring the package)

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

Peter Lemenkov  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov  ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #10)
> I feel you should base off the old retired package (spec file) please,
> unless there is a good/strong reason not to do that.
> Then you could also open a PR in pagure for the package unretirement as part
> of this review.
> I think that would make it easier to review and approve.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nim
>
> Latest upstream version is now 2.0, though 1.6.16 might be okay too for now?

Yes, sounds like a good idea. I'd love to see another language in Fedora
unretired.

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

Benson Muite  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #13 from Benson Muite  ---
Please upload spec file and srpm

[Bug 2183700] Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700

Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |2181693

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181693
[Bug 2181693] taskopen-2.0.2 is available