https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
Bug ID: 2183700 Summary: Review Request: nim - A statically typed compiled systems programming language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: topazus@outlook.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/topazus/test/fedora-rawhi... SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/topazus/test/fedora-rawhi...
Description: Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
Fedora Account System Username: topazus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://nim-lang.org/
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5735135 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Created attachment 1955094 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1955094&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5735135 to 5735583
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5735583 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Created attachment 1956359 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1956359&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5735583 to 5758534
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5758534 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
dongdigua dongdigua@outlook.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dongdigua@outlook.com
--- Comment #8 from dongdigua dongdigua@outlook.com --- 好耶! great! I also want nim to be back in Fedora again, thank you. btw, I'm unretiring nvi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
--- Comment #9 from Felix Wang topazus@outlook.com --- (In reply to dongdigua from comment #8)
好耶! great! I also want nim to be back in Fedora again, thank you. btw, I'm unretiring nvi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721
Thanks. As for the nvi unretirement, I have the similar question with Harald Reindl, since it was little commit history over the last two years, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721#c2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen@redhat.com
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- I feel you should base off the old retired package (spec file) please, unless there is a good/strong reason not to do that. Then you could also open a PR in pagure for the package unretirement as part of this review. I think that would make it easier to review and approve.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nim
Latest upstream version is now 2.0, though 1.6.16 might be okay too for now?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- Well maybe not PR, but rather a personal pagure fork anyway.
(In practice rel-eng will revert the last commit when un-retiring the package)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #10)
I feel you should base off the old retired package (spec file) please, unless there is a good/strong reason not to do that. Then you could also open a PR in pagure for the package unretirement as part of this review. I think that would make it easier to review and approve.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nim
Latest upstream version is now 2.0, though 1.6.16 might be okay too for now?
Yes, sounds like a good idea. I'd love to see another language in Fedora unretired.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |benson_muite@emailplus.org
--- Comment #13 from Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org --- Please upload spec file and srpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183700
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.ankur@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2181693
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181693 [Bug 2181693] taskopen-2.0.2 is available
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org