Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mindi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317
------- Additional Comments From dennis@ausil.us 2006-09-17 00:37 EST ------- Our supported arches are x86, x86_64, and ppc. from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines?action=show&red... - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x86, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x64, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-ppc
prebuilt binaries are not allowed. you must build them in your package or use the system busybox in this case. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-adf31c383612aac31371...
Upstream really should not provide them.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org