[Bug 2120106] New: Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+ Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
1:03 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
Bug ID: 2120106
Summary: Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: dcavalca(a)fb.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/tacacs/tacacs.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/tacacs/tacacs-F4.0.4.28.6fb^2022...
Description:
Tacacs+ (tac_plus) is a C daemon that authenticates requests via the Tacacs+
Protocol and logs accounting information.
This is a fork of Cisco + Shruberry's Tacacas+ daemons
(http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/)
Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
1:03 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
Davide Cavalca <dcavalca(a)fb.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca <dcavalca(a)fb.com> ---
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91101124
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
5:29 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
Michel Alexandre Salim <michel(a)michel-slm.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |michel(a)michel-slm.name
Flags| |fedora-review?
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |michel(a)michel-slm.name
--- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel(a)michel-slm.name> ---
Taking this review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
11:09 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca <dcavalca(a)fb.com> ---
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/tacacs/tacacs.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/tacacs/tacacs-F4.0.4.28.7fb~2022...
Changelog:
- update to a new git snapshot
- update license tag
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
3:09 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel(a)michel-slm.name> ---
Going to review the rest of it, but... the version numbering is really weird.
I'd consider dropping the 'F'. The 'fb' is probably OK though
unusual.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_ha...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
3:11 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel(a)michel-slm.name> ---
The Debian package is https://packages.debian.org/buster/tacacs+ with version
number 4.0.4.27a-3 for instance. Per the examples in the guidelines, I guess
apart from the leading F everything else is fine including the snapshot ~
convention (date g hash)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
3:54 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
Michel Alexandre Salim <michel(a)michel-slm.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(dcavalca(a)fb.com)
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel(a)michel-slm.name> ---
Looks mostly fine apart from:
- version (see above)
- naming -- should we just name this tacacs+ ? It's the name Debian uses, and +
is actually OK in package names:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_common...
- should the service file be named tacacs+.service too matching the package
name?
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "[generated
file]", "FSF
Unlimited License (with License Retention) [generated file]", "FSF
Unlimited License [generated file]", "NTP License", "*No
copyright*
[generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later
[generated file]", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later",
"X11
License [generated file]", "FSF Unlimited License (with License
Retention) GNU General Public License, Version 2", "GNU General Public
License v2.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License (with License
Retention)". 92 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in
/home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/2120106-tacacs/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[!]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 133120 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
Note: Systemd service file(s) in tacacs
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in tacacs-
libs , tacacs-devel , tacacs-extra
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
/bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8)
/bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8)
/bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8)
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 7
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libpam.so.0
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libcrypt.so.2
tacacs-libs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/debug/.dwz/tacacs-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/tac_pwd-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/tac_plus-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
debug (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
session (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
summarise_incoming_packet_type (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
dump_nas_pak (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
cfg_get_host_prompt (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
tac_malloc (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
tac_realloc (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
tac_strdup (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
cfg_get_host_key (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
md5_xor (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
dump_tacacs_pak (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
tac_lockfd (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
report (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-libs.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0
summarise_outgoing_packet_type (/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0)
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary
/usr/lib/debug/.dwz/tacacs-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64
tacacs-extra.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tac_convert
tacacs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
tacacs-extra.x86_64: W: no-documentation
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-documentation
tacacs-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
tacacs.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/sbin/tac_plus
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: E: missing-PT_GNU_STACK-section
/usr/lib/debug/.dwz/tacacs-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64
tacacs-libs-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug
/usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8)
ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for
`/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libtacacs.so.1.0.0-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug'
ldd: exited with unknown exit code (135)
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/tac_pwd-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug
/usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8)
ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for
`/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/tac_pwd-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug'
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed
/usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/tac_plus-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug
/usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8)
ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for
`/usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/tac_plus-F4.0.4.28.7fb~20220905g25fd8f0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug'
tacacs-libs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPLv3
tacacs-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPLv3
tacacs-extra.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPLv3
tacacs.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPLv3
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPLv3
tacacs-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPLv3
tacacs-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPLv3
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/debug/.dwz
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/debug/.dwz
tacacs-libs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/f7/15d2f9ae421b8971c270d0c761bad3a77a411a
../../../.build-id/f7/15d2f9ae421b8971c270d0c761bad3a77a411a
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/4a/bbde7f4f86e14718e4927ad8f6ceb36cd73712
../../../.build-id/4a/bbde7f4f86e14718e4927ad8f6ceb36cd73712
tacacs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/70/8ea18a52dd6db12542993829442c0b9410f723
../../../.build-id/70/8ea18a52dd6db12542993829442c0b9410f723
7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 22 errors, 21 warnings, 22 badness; has
taken 3.3 s
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/facebook/tac_plus/archive/25fd8f0eae7cd3db6a218508670d...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
25c7a7d1d5d5c6c69f5dec71656289c388fa80134c986012a458f9e5963ab817
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
25c7a7d1d5d5c6c69f5dec71656289c388fa80134c986012a458f9e5963ab817
Requires
--------
tacacs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/bin/sh
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libcrypt.so.2()(64bit)
libcrypt.so.2(XCRYPT_2.0)(64bit)
libpam.so.0()(64bit)
libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)(64bit)
libtacacs.so.1()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
tacacs-libs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libcrypt.so.2()(64bit)
libpam.so.0()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
tacacs-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libtacacs.so.1()(64bit)
tacacs-libs(x86-64)
tacacs-extra (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/usr/bin/perl
/usr/bin/python3
tacacs
tacacs-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
tacacs-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides
--------
tacacs:
tacacs
tacacs(x86-64)
tacacs-libs:
libtacacs.so.1()(64bit)
tacacs-libs
tacacs-libs(x86-64)
tacacs-devel:
tacacs-devel
tacacs-devel(x86-64)
tacacs-extra:
tacacs-extra
tacacs-extra(x86-64)
tacacs-debuginfo:
debuginfo(build-id)
tacacs-debuginfo
tacacs-debuginfo(x86-64)
tacacs-debugsource:
tacacs-debugsource
tacacs-debugsource(x86-64)
Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2120106
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: C/C++, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: R, Haskell, Python, SugarActivity, Java, fonts, PHP, Perl,
Ocaml
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
3:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel(a)michel-slm.name> ---
Oh, and description has a typo: Tacacas+ probably should be Tacacs+. I don't
see references to the former in the Shrubbery website.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
12:45 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
Michel Alexandre Salim <michel(a)michel-slm.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|needinfo?(dcavalca(a)fb.com) |
--- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel(a)michel-slm.name> ---
per offline discussion, since F-prefixed versions sort below versions without
it, and the F is used consistently in the source code, let's just leave it for
now. And the code consistently mentions Tacacs instead of Tacacs+ so naming is
OK too.
$ rpmdev-vercmp F4.0.4.28.6fb 4.0.4.28.6fb
F4.0.4.28.6fb < 4.0.4.28.6fb
APPROVED - just fix the typo in the description
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
12:50 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #9 from Davide Cavalca <dcavalca(a)fb.com> ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo tacacs 2120106
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/48111
$ fedpkg request-branch --repo tacacs f37
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/48112
$ fedpkg request-branch --repo tacacs f36
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/48113
$ fedpkg request-branch --repo tacacs f35
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/48114
$ fedpkg request-branch --repo tacacs epel8
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/48115
$ fedpkg request-branch --repo tacacs epel9
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/48116
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
1:54 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla <gwync(a)protonmail.com> ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tacacs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
6:01 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2022-514c130c3f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-514c130c3f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
6:05 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2022-10-11 11:05:07
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2022-514c130c3f has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
10:48 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2022-fcc7899bfb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-fcc7899bfb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
11:42 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2022-6c2334830b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6c2334830b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
11:57 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ac026d016e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ac026d016e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
12:05 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-12d69ce5ea has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-12d69ce5ea
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
4:38 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2022-fcc7899bfb has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-fcc7899bfb \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-fcc7899bfb
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
8:03 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2022-6c2334830b has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-6c2334830b \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6c2334830b
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
8:13 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-12d69ce5ea has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-12d69ce5ea
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
8:22 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ac026d016e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ac026d016e
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
10:51 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2022-6c2334830b has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
11:07 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-12d69ce5ea has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
11:12 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ac026d016e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
4:15 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2120106] Review Request: tacacs - Daemon to run AAA via TACACS+
Protocol via IPv4 and IPv6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2022-fcc7899bfb has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120106
592
days inactive
673
days old
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
24 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com