Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
Summary: Merge Review: zip Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: varekova@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: zip
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/zip/ Initial Owner: varekova@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
ruben@rubenkerkhof.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ruben@rubenkerkhof.com Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
ruben@rubenkerkhof.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|ruben@rubenkerkhof.com |varekova@redhat.com CC| |ruben@rubenkerkhof.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
------- Additional Comments From ruben@rubenkerkhof.com 2007-02-04 06:38 EST ------- Review for release 1.2.2: * RPM name is OK * Source zip231.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Source zcrypt29.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * File list looks OK
Needs work: * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) * Encoding should be UTF-8 * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros (wiki: QAChecklist item 7)
Minor: * The latest version is 2.32
Notes: * Please use {?dist} in the Release tag. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag for more info
Rpmlint is not silent:
Source RPM: W: zip summary-ended-with-dot A file compression and packaging utility compatible with PKZIP. E: zip tag-not-utf8 %changelog W: zip invalid-license distributable E: zip non-utf8-spec-file zip.spec W: zip mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 51, tab: line 47)
rpmlint of zip: W: zip summary-ended-with-dot A file compression and packaging utility compatible with PKZIP. E: zip tag-not-utf8 %changelog W: zip invalid-license distributable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
varekova@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From varekova@redhat.com 2007-02-06 09:24 EST ------- I have not updated to 2.32 - but everything else should be fixed in zip-2.31-2.fc7.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
ruben@rubenkerkhof.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(varekova@redhat.co | |m)
------- Additional Comments From ruben@rubenkerkhof.com 2007-02-06 16:04 EST ------- Hi Ivana,
One last thing, please preserve timestamps when installing files (install -p or cp -p)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
varekova@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(varekova@redhat.co| |m) |
------- Additional Comments From varekova@redhat.com 2007-02-07 04:03 EST ------- Fixed in zip-2.31-3.fc7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
varekova@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
varekova@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
ruben@rubenkerkhof.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From ruben@rubenkerkhof.com 2007-02-07 16:00 EST ------- I don't think the file BUGS is very relevant and MANUAL is a duplicate of the manpage your already installing.
Please consider removing those.
I don't see any further blockers, so this package is approved.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
varekova@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
wtogami@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
------- Additional Comments From pertusus@free.fr 2007-02-16 15:31 EST ------- Some suggestions:
* The crypt29 source seems to be unavailable. I have found: ftp://ftp.uu.net/pub/archiving/zip/src/zcrypt29.zip
* rename exec-shield.patch zip-exec-shield.patch
* add README.CR to %doc
* replace %defattr(-,root,root) with %defattr(-,root,root,-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium
mgarski@post.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgarski@post.pl
------- Additional Comments From mgarski@post.pl 2007-04-05 07:44 EST ------- * What's the reasons not updating to 2.32?
* I'm not sure but probably zcrypt29.zip can br droped.
As it states in crypt.c (from 2.31 and 2.32):
The main encryption/decryption source code for Info-Zip software was originally written in Europe. To the best of our knowledge, it can be freely distributed in both source and object forms from any country, including the USA under License Exception TSU of the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (section 740.13(e)) of 6 June 2002.
Prior to January 2000, re-export from the US was a violation of US law.
Enc/dec in 2.3{2,1} are newer then in zrypt29.zip
* Drop BUGS, as in 2.32 we can read: "This file is likely out of date 17 May 2006"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
pertusus@free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|varekova@redhat.com |nobody@fedoraproject.org Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?
------- Additional Comments From pertusus@free.fr 2008-02-05 11:55 EST ------- The bug should certainly be assigned to Ruben.
But the comments should also be addressed, in my opinion the package is not really ready for inclusion without those comments addressed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
Karel Klíč kklic@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kklic@redhat.com Flag|needinfo? |
--- Comment #9 from Karel Klíč kklic@redhat.com 2009-12-03 02:29:57 EDT --- All comments are probably addressed now:
- zip is updated to 3.0 in rawhide - zcrypt29.zip has been dropped - exec-shield.patch has been renamed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226669
Karel Klíč kklic@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org