Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: Likewise Open - Likewise Active Directory Authentication Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Summary: Review Request: Likewise Open - Likewise Active Directory Authentication Services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: krishnag@likewise.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:http://archives.likewise.com/~gcarter/Fedora/10/
SRPM URL:http://archives.likewise.com/~gcarter/Fedora/10/
Description: Likewise Open provides out-of-the-box authentication services for Linux systems to Windows Active Directory. Likewise Open accelerates the adoption of Linux systems in Windows-centric Active Directory corporate intranets.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Karsten Wade kwade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwade@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar@ispbrasil.com.br
--- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-03-04 18:59:20 EDT --- is this your first package ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
--- Comment #2 from Krishna Ganugapati krishnag@likewise.com 2009-03-04 19:55:42 EDT --- yes - am I missing something?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-03-04 22:50:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2)
yes - am I missing something?
yes, please get a fedora account(FAS) first
l@@k
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Get_a...
after you register please join the package group( in FAS ) and post your username here.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Xavier Bachelot xavier@bachelot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier@bachelot.org
--- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot xavier@bachelot.org 2009-03-13 21:37:18 EDT --- You need to provide a direct link to both the srpm and the spec file. Currently, one have to go to the url then look for the srpm. The spec file is not available at all and one need to download the 47 MB srpm to look at the spec.
Preliminary comments : - License tag is not valid. - Release is not using the disttag. - BuildRoot is not valid. - Source0 and Source999 need to be a full URL. - Spec file uses both spaces and tabs for indenting. - The first half of the following line in %%build section is not needed : [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - Same as above for %%clean section. - File attributes are not set. Add the following line at the top of all the packages sections : %defattr (-,root,root-) - %{_libdir}/likewise is not owned by any of the packages. - Config files are not marked as such use %config and %config(noreplace) where appropriate. - %{_sysconfdir}/likewise is not owned. - {_bindir}/demo is not owned. - {_prefix}/share should be {_datadir}. - /var should be {_localstatedir} - %{_prefix}/bin should be %{_bindir}. - %{_prefix}/data is not a standard dir and should not be created at all. - No version-release for the changelog entries. - No documentation included. - No license file included. - Services are provided but initscripts is not in the Requires: list nor are the proper %%pre, %preun, etc... scriptlet used. - You can use sed -i rather than sed then move, this will make the spec easier to read. - The build should probably not temper with the RPM_OPT_FLAGS and CFLAGS. - The whole %%build and %%install sctions look fishy. - Doesn't build in mock, needs at least to BuildRequires: openldap-devel, krb5-devel but even with that, build still fails.
The list above is nowhere near complete, this package needs a lot of work. Please carefully read the packaging guidelines to fix all of the above. You should also run rpmlint on all the rpms and srpm.
Also, not directly related to the review, one need to register to receive a link to the download page (http://www.likewise.com/community/index.php/download/). It seems there's no tarball to download but rather a lot of different tarballs. This is confusing...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(krishnag@likewise | |.com)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Krishna Ganugapati krishnag@likewise.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(krishnag@likewise | |.com) |
--- Comment #5 from Krishna Ganugapati krishnag@likewise.com 2009-04-13 16:40:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4)
You need to provide a direct link to both the srpm and the spec file. Currently, one have to go to the url then look for the srpm. The spec file is not available at all and one need to download the 47 MB srpm to look at the spec. Preliminary comments :
- License tag is not valid.
- Release is not using the disttag.
- BuildRoot is not valid.
- Source0 and Source999 need to be a full URL.
- Spec file uses both spaces and tabs for indenting.
- The first half of the following line in %%build section is not needed :
[ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- Same as above for %%clean section.
- File attributes are not set. Add the following line at the top of all the
packages sections : %defattr (-,root,root-)
- %{_libdir}/likewise is not owned by any of the packages.
- Config files are not marked as such use %config and %config(noreplace) where
appropriate.
- %{_sysconfdir}/likewise is not owned.
- {_bindir}/demo is not owned.
- {_prefix}/share should be {_datadir}.
- /var should be {_localstatedir}
- %{_prefix}/bin should be %{_bindir}.
- %{_prefix}/data is not a standard dir and should not be created at all.
- No version-release for the changelog entries.
- No documentation included.
- No license file included.
- Services are provided but initscripts is not in the Requires: list nor are
the proper %%pre, %preun, etc... scriptlet used.
- You can use sed -i rather than sed then move, this will make the spec easier
to read.
- The build should probably not temper with the RPM_OPT_FLAGS and CFLAGS.
- The whole %%build and %%install sctions look fishy.
- Doesn't build in mock, needs at least to BuildRequires: openldap-devel,
krb5-devel but even with that, build still fails. The list above is nowhere near complete, this package needs a lot of work. Please carefully read the packaging guidelines to fix all of the above. You should also run rpmlint on all the rpms and srpm. Also, not directly related to the review, one need to register to receive a link to the download page (http://www.likewise.com/community/index.php/download/). It seems there's no tarball to download but rather a lot of different tarballs. This is confusing...
Thank you! We're working on this.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
--- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-04-13 16:55:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5)
ok, please look Comment #3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(krishnag@likewise | |.com)
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-29 12:46:48 EDT --- What is the status of this bug?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
--- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-07-13 13:50:03 EDT --- ping ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(krishnag@likewise | |.com) |
--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-08-01 14:08:58 EDT --- No response; closing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2010-04-01 13:14:11 EDT ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 578886 ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org