[Bug 2121597] New: Review Request: python-sphinx-documatt-theme - Mobile-friendly Sphinx theme with beautiful typography
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
Bug ID: 2121597 Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx-documatt-theme - Mobile-friendly Sphinx theme with beautiful typography Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: loganjerry@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-documatt-theme/python-sphinx-d... SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-documatt-theme/python-sphinx-d... Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: A mobile-friendly Sphinx theme designed to provide a great documentation reading experience with beautiful typography.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2121598
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121598 [Bug 2121598] Review Request: python-sphinx-reredirects - Handle redirects for moved pages in Sphinx documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
Jonathan Wright jonathan@almalinux.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC| |jonathan@almalinux.org QA Contact|extras-qa@fedoraproject.org |jonathan@almalinux.org Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
Jonathan Wright jonathan@almalinux.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wright jonathan@almalinux.org --- Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* MIT License", "Unknown or generated". 19 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jonathan/fedora-review/2121597-python-sphinx-documatt- theme/licensecheck.txt [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1
python3-sphinx-documatt-theme.noarch: W: invalid-license BSD-2-Clause 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s
Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/s/sphinx_documatt_theme/sphin... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 7ee912201c79251206a51df4de8cd0538815e576dc7b242b29ca9d223132c72e CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7ee912201c79251206a51df4de8cd0538815e576dc7b242b29ca9d223132c72e
Requires -------- python3-sphinx-documatt-theme (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3.11dist(sphinx)
Provides -------- python3-sphinx-documatt-theme: python-sphinx-documatt-theme python3-sphinx-documatt-theme python3.11-sphinx-documatt-theme python3.11dist(sphinx-documatt-theme) python3dist(sphinx-documatt-theme)
Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2121597 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Python Disabled plugins: SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, R, fonts, Java, C/C++, PHP, Haskell Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com --- Thank you for the review!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |jonathan@almalinux.org QA Contact|jonathan@almalinux.org |extras-qa@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla gwync@protonmail.com --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinx-documatt-theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2022-f685e269c6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f685e269c6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com --- The builds are done for Rawhide and F37. A buildroot override has been submitted for F37. To make sure they are available for building against, run:
Rawhide: koji wait-repo --target rawhide --build=python-sphinx-documatt-theme-0.0.5-1.fc38 F37: koji wait-repo f37-build --build=python-sphinx-documatt-theme-0.0.5-1.fc37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2022-f685e269c6 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-f685e269c6 *` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f685e269c6
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2022-09-12 17:40:45
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2022-f685e269c6 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com