Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: tlomt-league-gothic-fonts - a sans serif gothic typeface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
Summary: Review Request: tlomt-league-gothic-fonts - a sans serif gothic typeface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kerneljack@kerneljack.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: ---
Spec URL: http://www.kerneljack.com/rpms/tlomt-league-gothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kerneljack.com/rpms/tlomt-league-gothic-fonts-1.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: League Gothic is a revival of an old classic, Alternate Gothic No.1. It was originally designed by Morris Fuller Benton for the American Type Founders Company (ATF) in 1903. The company went bankrupt in 1993. And since the original typeface was created before 1923, the typeface is in the public domain. It is a sans serif gothic typeface
NOTE: This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. In addition, some hosting space, perhaps on fedorapeople.org would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
Khusro Jaleel kerneljack@kerneljack.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
Ryan me@ryanlewis.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |me@ryanlewis.net
--- Comment #1 from Ryan me@ryanlewis.net 2011-06-26 12:48:26 EDT --- I inspected the spec file, and it seems to match the guidelines listed: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
it also passed rpmlint cleanly.
I would recommend publishing a koji scratch build.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |kevin@scrye.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com 2011-07-02 10:11:29 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this package and look at sponsoring you. ;)
Look for a full review hopefully later today.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com 2011-07-02 11:56:39 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (OFL) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 72b228695f1ad8ac0e3824a1e7edb313 league-gothic.zip 72b228695f1ad8ac0e3824a1e7edb313 ../SOURCES/league-gothic.zip OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin
Issues:
1. Not a blocker, but you might add to the description. Reading just what you have makes it sound like this is a public domain font from 1903, but in fact the second paragraph upstream says: "We decided to make our own version, and contribute it to the Open Source Type Movement. It’s free, not only in price, but in freedom" So, perhaps a note that this is a version of that font?
2. Might ask upstream if they could include a copy of the OFL in their zip file? (Not a blocker, but nice to have).
3. rpmlint says:
tlomt-league-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Which can be ignored.
Fix up the description and I think we are good to go...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
--- Comment #4 from Khusro Jaleel kerneljack@kerneljack.com 2011-07-02 18:44:14 EDT --- Thanks, Kevin. I have updated the description field now and uploaded a new .src.rpm with an incremented Release tag of "2". You will find it below:
SRPM: http://kerneljack.com/rpms/tlomt-league-gothic-fonts-1.0-2.fc15.src.rpm SPEC: http://kerneljack.com/rpms/tlomt-league-gothic-fonts.spec Koji scratch build against Rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3176288
Please let me know if this is ok, thanks again for the help. I'm going to package up another font soon!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com 2011-07-03 10:02:44 EDT --- Looks good. This package is APPROVED.
I will go ahead and sponsor you. Can you confirm your fedora account system account name for me in email or irc (my nick on irc is 'nirik') ?
Please don't hesitate to ask questions and I will assist you as best I can. After I sponsor you in the account system you can continue the process from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_Source...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
Khusro Jaleel kerneljack@kerneljack.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-07-04 20:07:42 EDT --- Please complete a SCM request if setting the fedora-cvs flag.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
Khusro Jaleel kerneljack@kerneljack.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Khusro Jaleel kerneljack@kerneljack.com 2011-07-05 00:57:25 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: tlomt-league-gothic-fonts Short Description: League Gothic is a revival of an old classic, Alternate Gothic No.1. Owners: kjaleel Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6 InitialCC: fonts-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-07-05 03:32:02 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
Paul Flo Williams paul@frixxon.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul@frixxon.co.uk
--- Comment #9 from Paul Flo Williams paul@frixxon.co.uk 2011-11-30 02:42:47 EST --- Khusro, could you please complete some builds of this and push them as updates so this review gets closed off?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
--- Comment #10 from Khusro Jaleel kerneljack@kerneljack.com 2011-12-05 05:22:37 EST --- Hi Paul, apologies for the late reply here, I was hoping to find some time to re-read the package review guidelines document to find out what I was missing before asking you, but I haven't had much time to do so.
As far as I was aware, I have already created the package and done a koji build, etc and the package is now part of F16, so I am not sure what is left remaining to be done? Could you please let me know?
Thanks.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408
Paul Flo Williams paul@frixxon.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-12-05 13:25:06
--- Comment #11 from Paul Flo Williams paul@frixxon.co.uk 2011-12-05 13:25:06 EST --- OK, I can see the build for F16, but Bodhi isn't showing any updates. Closing now.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org