https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
Bug ID: 1316664 Summary: Review Request: perl-List-SomeUtils-XS - XS implementation for List::SomeUtils Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jplesnik@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS/perl-List-SomeUtils... SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS/perl-List-SomeUtils...
Description: There are no user-facing parts here. See List::SomeUtils for API details.
You shouldn't have to install this module directly. When you install List::SomeUtils, it checks whether your system has a compiler. If it does, then it adds a dependency on this module so that it gets installed and you have the faster XS implementation.
Fedora Account System Username: jplesnik@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ppisar@redhat.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ppisar@redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- URL and Source0 addresses are usable. Ok. Source archive is original (SHA-256: 64cdf8172568fe4fa689f01c83b54d2471ff7f293ec3d71ba83153204a90550e). Ok. Summary verified from lib/List/SomeUtils/XS.pm. Ok. Description verified from lib/List/SomeUtils/XS.pm.
TODO: I had bad feeling about the description. It describes internal representation that is not relevant to binary RPM package (perl-List-SomeUtils binary RPM does not check for a compiler etc.). I would rather see the description rewritten from point of view of packaged software. Or just a simple notice that the package delivers accelerated List::SomeUtils internals.
FIX: Artistic 2.0 license verified from README.md, lib/List/SomeUtils/XS.pm, LICENSE. But there is the bundled ppport.h (GPL+ or Artistic) that is compiled into the binary file. I think correct license tag is "Artistic 2.0 and (GPL+ or Artistic)".
Architecture specific package because of XS code. Ok.
blib not used. Ok. IO::Handle not used. Ok. IPC::Open3 not used. Ok. Pod::Coverage::TrustPod not used. Ok. Pod::Wordlist not used. Ok.
Scalar::Util is optional. Ok. Storable is optional. Ok.
Test::Code::TidyAll not used. Ok. Test::CPAN::Changes not used. Ok. Test::CPAN::Meta::JSON not used. Ok. Test::EOL not used. Ok.
Test::LeakTrace is optional. Ok.
Test::Mojibake not used. Ok. Test::NoTabs not used. Ok. Test::Pod not used. Ok. Test::Pod::Coverage not used. Ok. Test::Spelling not used. Ok. Test::Synopsis not used. Ok. Test::Version not used. Ok.
All tests pass. Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-List-SomeUtils-XS.spec ../SRPMS/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-0.51-1.fc25.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint is Ok.
$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-0.51-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 24 16:10 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/List drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 24 16:10 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/List/SomeUtils -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2138 Feb 27 17:45 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/List/SomeUtils/XS.pm drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 24 16:10 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 24 16:10 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/SomeUtils drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 24 16:10 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/SomeUtils/XS -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 135056 Mar 24 16:10 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/SomeUtils/XS/XS.so drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 24 16:10 /usr/share/doc/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 146 Feb 27 17:45 /usr/share/doc/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS/Changes -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1126 Feb 27 17:45 /usr/share/doc/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS/README.md drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 24 16:10 /usr/share/licenses/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9040 Feb 27 17:45 /usr/share/licenses/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS/LICENSE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1657 Mar 24 16:10 /usr/share/man/man3/List::SomeUtils::XS.3pm.gz File layout and permissions are Ok.
$ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-0.51-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 libc.so.6()(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) 1 libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.6.0 1 perl(List::SomeUtils::PP) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 perl(XSLoader) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Binary requires are Ok.
$ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-0.51-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(List::SomeUtils::XS) = 0.51 1 perl-List-SomeUtils-XS = 0.51-1.fc25 1 perl-List-SomeUtils-XS(x86-64) = 0.51-1.fc25 Binary provides are Ok.
$ resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-0.51-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.
Package builds in F25 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13448202). Ok.
Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.
Please correct all `FIX' items, consider fixing `TODO' items, and provide a new spec file. Resolution: Package NOT approved.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com --- Updated
Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS/perl-List-SomeUtils... SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS/perl-List-SomeUtils...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- Spec file changes:
--- perl-List-SomeUtils-XS.spec.old 2016-03-10 18:21:03.000000000 +0100 +++ perl-List-SomeUtils-XS.spec 2016-03-29 12:10:59.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ Name: perl-List-SomeUtils-XS Version: 0.51 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: XS implementation for List::SomeUtils -License: Artistic 2.0 +License: Artistic 2.0 and (GPL+ or Artistic) URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/List-SomeUtils-XS/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DR/DROLSKY/List-SomeUtils-XS-%%7Bversion%7D... BuildRequires: findutils @@ -37,12 +37,10 @@ Requires: perl(XSLoader)
%description -There are no user-facing parts here. See List::SomeUtils for API details. +List::SomeUtils provides some trivial but commonly needed functionality on +lists which is not going to go into List::Util.
-You shouldn't have to install this module directly. When you install -List::SomeUtils, it checks whether your system has a compiler. If it does, -then it adds a dependency on this module so that it gets installed and you -have the faster XS implementation. +XS implementation is faster than List::SomeUtils.
%prep %setup -q -n List-SomeUtils-XS-%{version} @@ -67,5 +65,8 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog +* Tue Mar 29 2016 Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com - 0.51-2 +- Updated license and description + * Thu Mar 10 2016 Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com - 0.51-1 - Initial release
TODO: I had bad feeling about the description. It describes internal representation that is not relevant to binary RPM package (perl-List-SomeUtils binary RPM does not check for a compiler etc.).
%description -There are no user-facing parts here. See List::SomeUtils for API details. +List::SomeUtils provides some trivial but commonly needed functionality on +lists which is not going to go into List::Util.
-You shouldn't have to install this module directly. When you install -List::SomeUtils, it checks whether your system has a compiler. If it does, -then it adds a dependency on this module so that it gets installed and you -have the faster XS implementation. +XS implementation is faster than List::SomeUtils. Ok.
FIX: Artistic 2.0 license verified from README.md, lib/List/SomeUtils/XS.pm, LICENSE. But there is the bundled ppport.h (GPL+ or Artistic) that is compiled into the binary file. I think correct license tag is "Artistic 2.0 and (GPL+ or Artistic)".
-License: Artistic 2.0 +License: Artistic 2.0 and (GPL+ or Artistic) Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-List-SomeUtils-XS.spec ../SRPMS/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-0.51-2.fc25.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-*2.* perl-List-SomeUtils-XS.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Util -> Til, U til, Until perl-List-SomeUtils-XS.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Util -> Til, U til, Until 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint is Ok.
Package builds in F25 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13494781). Ok.
Resolution: Package APPROVED.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
--- Comment #4 from Till Maas opensource@till.name --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-List-SomeUtils-XS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
Jitka Plesnikova jplesnik@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Fixed In Version| |perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-0.51 | |-2.fc25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-0.51-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a94872c3eb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-0.51-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a94872c3eb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- perl-List-SomeUtils-XS-0.51-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316664
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2016-04-04 13:25:26
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org