Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Summary: Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davids@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter-2.0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: IMAPFilter is a mail filtering utility. It connects to remote mail servers using the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP), sends searching queries to the server and processes mailboxes based on the results. It can be used to delete, copy, move, flag, etc. messages residing in mailboxes at the same or different mail servers. The 4rev1 and 4 versions of the IMAP protocol are supported.
This is just a pure packaging of the upstream imapfilter.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola@iki.fi
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-08-06 07:54:58 EDT --- First, be sure to read and understand http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
Now, a few comments:
- Drop BuildRequires: glibc-devel gcc binutils make as these are in the standard buildroot http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
- Drop the Requires: line altogether, they're automatically picked up by RPM. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
- Instead of ./configure -p %{_prefix} -b %{_bindir} -s %{_datadir}/imapfilter -m %{_mandir} use %configure
- Drop mkdir -m 755 -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ cp README LICENSE ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ as you already have listed the files in %doc. (The doc directory is removed, recreated and the files listed in %doc placed into it when %doc is processed.)
- Replace /usr/bin/ with %{_bindir} /usr/share/ with %{_datadir} /usr/share/man with %{_mandir}
- You're not owning %{_datadir}/imapfilter, instead of /usr/share/imapfilter/account.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/auxiliary.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/common.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/deprecated.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/mailbox.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/message.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/options.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/regex.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/set.lua you can just specify %{_datadir}/imapfilter/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #2 from David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com 2009-08-10 08:08:44 EDT --- Quick update. I rearranged things according to suggestions. I could not change the ./configure to use %configure, as it is not a autotools based configure script, just a normal shell script doing some basic stuff.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #3 from David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com 2009-08-10 08:09:24 EDT --- btw. Spec URL now contains the new spec file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #4 from David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com 2009-08-10 13:42:33 EDT --- Found one issue regarding debuginfo packages, missing CFLAGS=-g during compilation. I've contacted the upstream developer to see if we can get a patch into the configure scripts which adds the needed compiler flags via CFLAGS. Awaiting feedback before I continue.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #5 from David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com 2009-08-10 13:43:22 EDT --- (removed FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-09-09 20:38:14 EDT --- I see you removed the NEEDSPONSOR blocker, but I can't find your name in the account system. It's not "davids" and a search on "Sommerseth" finds nothing. What's your FAS ID?
I downloaded and unpacked the src.rpm linked above, but it doesn't seem to match the spec file linked above. Whenever you make a change to a package under review, you should increase Release:, generate a new package and update both that and the spec file. Otherwise it quickly becomes difficult for any prospective review to keep things straight. There are far more submissions than reviewers, so making it difficult for reviewers is not a good idea.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #7 from David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com 2009-09-23 04:59:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
I see you removed the NEEDSPONSOR blocker, but I can't find your name in the account system. It's not "davids" and a search on "Sommerseth" finds nothing.
Ahh sorry! I thought that Jussi Lehtola forgot to do that when answering. My mistake!
What's your FAS ID?
It should be dsommers
I downloaded and unpacked the src.rpm linked above, but it doesn't seem to match the spec file linked above. Whenever you make a change to a package under review, you should increase Release:, generate a new package and update both that and the spec file. Otherwise it quickly becomes difficult for any prospective review to keep things straight. There are far more submissions than reviewers, so making it difficult for reviewers is not a good idea.
Again, I'm sorry for making a mess here.
Anyhow! A new release if imapfilter has surfaced, so I've updated spec files and built a new src.rpm. Hopefully things are more consistent now.
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter/imapfilter.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter/imapfilter-2.0.11-1.fc11.src.rp...
You made me aware of rpmlint in another bz ... so I did run rpmlint on spec file, src.rpm and binary rpms. But there is one thing which I'm not able to fix ...
imapfilter.src:25: W: configure-without-libdir-spec imapfilter.spec:25: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
I believe this is because the configure script is not autotools based. I've made a comment about it in the .spec file. I did however reduce this warning to only appear once in each file and not twice, by renaming the ./configure script.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-09-23 13:37:09 EDT --- Oh, for whatever reason you have privacy set so that a search for your name finds nothing. I see the "dsommers" account is not in the packager group and I don't see any offer to sponsor you in this ticket, so I've readded the NEEDSPONSOR blocker.
One thing I note immediately is that this package does not use the proper set of compiler flags. I see you forced "-g"; you really need to pass all of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS.
Don't worry about the "configure-without-libdir-spec" complaint; rpmlint just doesn't understand that your configure script isn't generated by autoconf. There is no need to try and work around bogus warnings at all, and doing so often only adds needless crap to the spec. The point is to address the rpmlint complaints in the review, even if it's just to note that the complaints are erroneous.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #9 from David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com 2009-09-24 04:34:22 EDT --- Thanks again for a very quick feedback!
I've added the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS as requested. In addition I also removed the renaming of the configure script. I hope I haven't missed anything else ...
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter/imapfilter.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc11.src.rp...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-10-12 15:30:25 EDT --- Some notes:
* Using %versin macro - Using %{version} macro on Source0 is preferred because with this you probably won't have to change Source0 line when version is upgraded: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D
* CFLAGS - CFLAGS is still wrong (i.e. Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 47 + make -j4 48 cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -O -DMAKEFILE_SHAREDIR='"/usr/share/imapfilter"' -I/usr/local/include -c -o auth.o auth.c 49 cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -O -DMAKEFILE_SHAREDIR='"/usr/share/imapfilter"' -I/usr/local/include -c -o buffer.o buffer.c ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Fedora's default optimization level is "-O2" (as you can check by $ rpm --eval %optflags), which is replaced by the latter "-O".
* Installing documents ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mkdir -m 755 -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ cp README LICENSE ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - These two lines do nothing and should be removed. ! build.log shows this: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 120 + mkdir -m 755 -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11/ 121 + cp README LICENSE /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11/ ..... ..... 133 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JZOnjc 134 + umask 022 135 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD 136 + cd imapfilter-2.0.11 137 + DOCDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11 138 + export DOCDIR 139 + rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11 140 + /bin/mkdir -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11 141 + cp -pr README LICENSE /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc12.i386/usr/share/doc/imapfilter-2.0.11 142 + exit 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Especially see the lines 139-140. i.e. %doc foo (where foo is not a absolute path) means: - First clean up %buildroot%_defaultdocdir/<rpm_name>-%version completely - Then create %buildroot%_defaultdocdir/<rpm_name>-%version and copy the specified files into the directory.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #11 from David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com 2009-10-13 03:18:23 EDT --- Applied changes suggested by Mamoru Tasaka in comment #10.
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter-2.0.10-3.fc11.src.rpm Patch0 URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dsommers/imapfilter/imapfilter-configure.patch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-10-14 15:11:39 EDT --- Please post the correct URL of the srpm :)
Anyway: - Now this package can be approved. - Usually a person who needs sponsorship for packager group is requested to either submit another review request or do a pre-review of other person's review request as written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
Now you have another review request (bug 515230), which seems good to some extent from a quick glance.
------------------------------------------------------ This package (imapfilter) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------
Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you.
If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11/12, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system).
If you have questions, please ask me.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(davids@redhat.com | |)
--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-10-23 10:16:20 EDT --- ping?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(davids@redhat.com | |) |
--- Comment #14 from David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com 2009-10-23 10:39:11 EDT --- Sorry! I've been quite busy lately and haven't had time to look into this yet. I've done a koji scratch build which looked good at first sight.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1747177
Unfortunately, I will be very busy the next two weeks or so, before I'll manage to continue. It's far from forgotten ... I just to complete some more urgent work first.
I'll come back stronger as soon as possible!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Ian Weller ian@ianweller.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian@ianweller.org
--- Comment #15 from Ian Weller ian@ianweller.org 2009-11-14 17:02:03 EDT --- ping?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #16 from David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com 2009-11-16 04:44:17 EDT --- I'm ready for some work on this package now, after some über hectic weeks. Going to read through a lot of the documentation about sponsorship again, to refresh what I need to do now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-16 07:24:04 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #18 from David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com 2009-11-16 08:36:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: imapfilter Short Description: A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers Owners: dsommers Branches: F11 F21 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
David Sommerseth davids@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-16 10:10:21 EDT --- F21 is perhaps F12.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-11-16 12:57:32 EDT --- CVS done (with F-11 and F-12 branches instead of "F11 F21").
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-16 14:02:21 EDT --- imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-16 14:02:27 EDT --- imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-17 11:53:19 EDT --- Closing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-30 23:29:36 EDT --- imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.0.11-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-04 18:58:25 EDT --- imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.11-3.fc11 |2.0.11-3.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Andrea Veri andrea.veri@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrea.veri@gmail.com
--- Comment #26 from Andrea Veri andrea.veri@gmail.com 2012-02-24 06:22:23 EST --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: imapfilter New Branches: el6 Owners: dsommers averi InitialCC: dsommers averi
Imapfilter is not (yet) available for EPEL, please create the required branch so we can import it there. David acked this request.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Andrea Veri andrea.veri@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com 2012-02-24 08:02:25 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-24 08:20:32 EST --- imapfilter-2.2.2-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imapfilter-2.2.2-4.el6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-27 06:44:57 EST --- imapfilter-2.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imapfilter-2.5-1.el6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.11-3.fc12 |imapfilter-2.5-1.el6
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-15 15:56:07 EDT --- imapfilter-2.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org