[Bug 483434] New: Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request:  argtable2 -  A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Summary: Review Request:  argtable2 -  A library for parsing
                    GNU style command line arguments
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora

Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec
SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-10-1.src.rpm
Description: 
 Argtable is an ANSI C library for parsing GNU style command line arguments.
 It enables a program's command line syntax to be defined in the source code as
 an array of argtable structs. The command line is then parsed according to
that
 specification and the resulting values are returned in those same structs
where
 they are accessible to the main program. Both tagged (-v, --verbose,
--foo=bar)
 and untagged arguments are supported, as are multiple instances of each
 argument. Syntax error handling is automatic and the library also provides the
 means for displaying the command line syntax directly from the array of
 argument specifications.
 Argtable can function as a "getopt_long" replacement, without the user of the
 program noticing the difference. Unlike "getopt_long", argtable is
 cross platform and works on Windows and Mac as well as Posix systems.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Jess Portnoy  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |http://argtable.sourceforge
                   |                            |.net/

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Christian Krause  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #1 from Christian Krause   2009-02-16 18:31:57 EDT ---
This is just an informal review - I hope it helps anyway:

build test:
- package builds fine on F10 and F11 for all architectures

major issue:
- md5sum of argtable2-10.tar.gz contained in the src.rpm doesn't match the
upstream package

minor issues:

- I don't know whether there are strict rules regarding the documentation, but
I would rather put the content of /usr/share/doc/argtable2 into
/usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10, because the documentation seems to be
necessary only for development purposes.

- according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net Source0
should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.gz
(and not prdownloads.sf.net)

- rpmlint:
rpmlint SRPMS/argtable2-10-1.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/i386/argtable2-*
SPECS/argtable2.spec
argtable2-devel.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/.deps
argtable2-devel.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/.deps

I've had a look at this tests directory and since it was copied out of an
source tree which uses auto* tools it cannot be used easily ouside. E.g. copy
the directory and try a make fails:

make: *** No rule to make target `../configure.ac', needed by `Makefile.in'. 
Stop.

Additionally it looks like that the tests really work only when built from
within the source, since they use includes like this:
fntests.c:
#include "../src/argtable2.h"
#include <assert.h>

Since the tests cannot be compiled just with the installed header files of the
library anyway, probably it would be better not to package them at all.

argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/fntests.sh
argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/test_dbl.sh
argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/test_int.sh
argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/test_date.sh
argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/test_rex.sh
argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/test_lit.sh
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.

Since these are shell scripts it should be OK to that they are executable,
however I suggest not to package the tests at all.

Instead of "tests" it would be an option to package "examples" into
/usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/: "examples" contains a bunch of good
examples and can be compiled (even outside of the source tree) easily.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #2 from Jess Portnoy   2009-02-19 06:59:29 EDT ---
Thank you for your review, Christian.

New src.rpm is available from:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-10-2.src.rpm
Spec file URL is still:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #3 from Christian Krause   2009-02-19 14:59:03 EDT ---
Thanks for the new packages. Here is a more detailed review:

Most issues are resolved besides some minor documentation issue and the static
library.

GOOD:
* Rpmlint
rpmlint SRPMS/argtable2-10-2.fc10.src.rpm
RPMS/i386/argtable2-10-2.fc10.i386.rpm
RPMS/i386/argtable2-debuginfo-10-2.fc10.i386.rpm
RPMS/i386/argtable2-devel-10-2.fc10.i386.rpm SPECS/argtable2.spec
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
* Package name, spec file name and upstream package name match
* Download via spectool -r works
* Packaged tarball matches upstream (md5sum: 2ea4cd1b55ee250baa37a42b255ae426)
* License tag GPLv2+ matches the source (Although I've checked only a couple of
files)
* License GPLv2+ is acceptable for Fedora
* License file packaged in %doc
* Mock build successfully (F10)
* Koji scratch build successful for all archs on F10 and F11:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1140640
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1140678
* No build dependencies besides base system
* No locales included, so no locale handling needed
* Package contains libraries, ldconfig is called in %post and %postun
* %defattr used for all packages
* %clean section exists
* *.la files deleted
* Macros correctly used
* Header in -devel package
* *.so link in -devel package
* -devel package requires fully versioned base package
* rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install and %clean

NEED WORK:
* examples are included in both base and -devel package
* other files /usr/share/doc/argtable2 should be better packaged in
%doc of the devel package
* static libraries are shipped in devel package: please have a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries
and either put the static library in a -static package or remove it.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #4 from Jess Portnoy   2009-02-20 14:22:39 EDT ---
Hello Christian,

I've omitted the archive file from the package.
Also, all documentation except the mandatory AUTHORS, COPYING, ChangeLog and
README files now installs as part of the devel package.

New src.rpm is available from:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-10-3.src.rpm
Spec file URL is still:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec

Thanks again,

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #5 from Christian Krause   2009-02-24 15:04:47 EDT ---
Hello Jess,

good:
- all mentioned issues solved
- content of the binary packages is now ok

very minor issue - just for completeness:
- omit the macro in the changelog of the spec file, otherwise rpmlint will
complain:
SPECS/argtable2.spec:66: W: macro-in-%changelog _defaultdocdir

- you've added the spec file to the sources, so the sources in the provided
src.rpm are slightly different from the ones on sf.net

Besides these two little minor issues I think the package looks very good.
Since I'm not an "offical" reviewer I could only help you up to this point and
so somebody with that status has to do the final formal review to give you the
approval for the new package.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #6 from Jess Portnoy   2009-03-04 07:28:42 EDT ---
Hello Christian,

Latest src.rpm is:
downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-10-4.src.rpm
Spec file URL is still: 
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec

Thanks again for reviewing,

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts   2009-03-07 12:37:11 EDT ---
I do not see that you have an account in the Fedora system yet.  Is this your
first package for Fedora?

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #8 from Jess Portnoy   2009-03-07 17:52:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I do not see that you have an account in the Fedora system yet.  Is this your
> first package for Fedora?

Hello Jason,

Yes, it is.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Michael Schwendt  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt   2009-03-08 08:01:40 EDT ---
* It is good packaging-practice to add

%check
  make check

after the %install section.

* The -devel subpackage refers to "libargtable2" while the package is called
"argtable2" and the main pkg description calls the software "Argtable". This
inconsistency causes minor confusion. You could substitute "libargtable2" with
the project name, package %{name} or even "Argtable library".

* The %doc examples/Makefile.nmake is for MSVC.

* The %doc examples/Makefile contains a hardcoded '/lib', which won't work on
64-bit platforms. [As a side-note: Overriding -Iheader/-Llibrary search-paths
with default search-paths is a wide-spread mistake that causes unwanted
side-effects. Here it's just examples and therefore neglectable, but where you
see it in other software releases, try to get rid of it.]

* The %doc files are large enough to justify creating a -doc subpackage and
moving them there. If every -devel package included so much documentation,
creating buildroots and -devel spins would require a lot more resources.
argtable2-devel shrinks down to 6K from 3M (!).

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #10 from Jess Portnoy   2009-03-09 11:32:57 EDT ---
Hello Michael,

Thanks for the review.
I've contacted the argtable2 maintainer, I host the src.rpm and spec file in
his site. He said he is working on a newer version which will also include the
change to example/Makefile and will upload the revised RPMS and spec file
within a few days.

For now, the spec file can be checked out here:
cvs -d:pserver:[e-mail]:/cvsroot/jessrpms login
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[e-mail]:/cvsroot/jessrpms co
-P SPECS/argtable2.spec

I applied all requested changes and added a changelog entry.

Thanks,

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Jussi Lehtola  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola   2009-05-22 12:34:13 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Hello Michael,
>
> Thanks for the review.
> I've contacted the argtable2 maintainer, I host the src.rpm and spec file in
> his site. He said he is working on a newer version which will also include the
> change to example/Makefile and will upload the revised RPMS and spec file
> within a few days.
>
> For now, the spec file can be checked out here:
> cvs -d:pserver:[e-mail]:/cvsroot/jessrpms login
> cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[e-mail]:/cvsroot/jessrpms co
> -P SPECS/argtable2.spec

Please, put the specfile some place easily available.

The SPEC from the sourceforge page doesn't even open in firefox. You can use
e.g. your fedoraproject account to host the spec and srpms.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola   2009-05-22 12:43:20 EDT ---
Also:

- Remove the heading space from the description

- Refer to argtable2 instead of libargtable2 in the devel package.

- You probably don't need to use --docdir in the %configure phase. After
install, you should move the documentation back into the build directory, e.g.
 mv %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-devel-%{version} docdir
and include the documentation with
 %doc docdir/*
Also, as the documentation is large, you should branch it to a package of its
own as Michael suggested.

(Also, I'm not very fond of using macros for rm, make and so on.)

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #13 from Jess Portnoy   2009-05-24 13:59:59 EDT ---
Hello,

All changes were applied as suggested.
The new src.rpm can be downloaded from:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-11-2.fc11.src.rpm

I'm actually pretty fond of using macros but if you see a good reason not to,
I'm willing to modify the spec file accordingly.

Thanks,

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola   2009-05-24 14:47:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Hello,
>
> All changes were applied as suggested.
> The new src.rpm can be downloaded from:
> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-11-2.fc11.src.rpm

What about the spec file?

I'd suggest using something else than the project home page, as the review
process may take many steps before everything is in order.
> I'm actually pretty fond of using macros but if you see a good reason not to,
> I'm willing to modify the spec file accordingly.

Well, it's not an official guideline; I just think it isn't good style as
nothing is gained from using the macros: KISS!

Do you still need a sponsor? I can sponsor you, if you show me you know the
Fedora Packaging guidelines. Thus you need to do a couple of informal reviews
(as Christian did on this package), and make at least one another package
submission.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #15 from Jess Portnoy   2009-05-25 06:26:19 EDT ---
Hello,
The spec file can be obtained from:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec

About where it is hosted, it's OK, I have the ability to upload to this SF
project whenever needed :)

I actually do need a sponser and would appreciate your help.
I will start performing informal reviews this weekend. 
I also have another submission here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598

Which I expect to update shortly, the maintainer is about to release a new
source ball.

Thanks,

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Jussi Lehtola  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola   2009-05-25 08:06:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Hello,
> The spec file can be obtained from:
> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec
>
> About where it is hosted, it's OK, I have the ability to upload to this SF
> project whenever needed :)

Well, I wouldn't publish anything temporary. Also you won't be able to do this
for every package, so you should at least know how to use a www server to host
your specs & srpms (be it fedoraproject or other).

I don't like SF since it offers the spec file as binary instead of text.
> I actually do need a sponser and would appreciate your help.
> I will start performing informal reviews this weekend. 
> I also have another submission here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598

Okay. Mail me or paste here links to the reviews you have made.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Jussi Lehtola  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)      |

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #17 from Jess Portnoy   2009-05-25 09:17:20 EDT ---
I'll mail you.
About uploading to a server other than SF's, I have no objection but have no
such server at my disposal. If I can get an account that enables uploading to
the fedoraproject server, that would be great, am I authorized to do this with
my current account?

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola   2009-05-25 09:30:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I'll mail you.
> About uploading to a server other than SF's, I have no objection but have no
> such server at my disposal. If I can get an account that enables uploading to
> the fedoraproject server, that would be great, am I authorized to do this with
> my current account?

You should be able to do so with your FAS account once you are sponsored.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org

For now SF is fine.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt   2009-06-08 06:50:57 EDT ---
Using macros for commands, which are supposed to be located in $PATH, doesn't
add any value.

For example, a "configure" script would fail, if it searched for "cp" in $PATH,
but an RPM build environment redefined %__cp to something outside $PATH. Same
applies to lots of other tools. Their macro values expand to absolute path, but
none of these paths are passed to the configure scripts, make, or other build
frameworks. Even with major redefinition of macro values, you could not fully
customise the rpmbuild without modifying the spec/src.rpm.

Often, macro usage adds further inconsistencies even directly in the spec
files:
> %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ;

Once %{__rm}, below plain "rm".  "find" is macro-less.  /sbin/ldconfig in the
scriptlets is macro-less, too.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola   2009-06-08 07:52:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Using macros for commands, which are supposed to be located in $PATH, doesn't
> add any value.

Yeah, but using them is not forbidden.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt   2009-06-08 08:00:02 EDT ---
Right, and I did not say they would be forbidden. I just replied to comment
13.

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola   2009-07-05 06:35:33 EDT ---
ping?

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

--- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola   2009-07-22 08:34:47 EDT ---
ping again jess

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Jussi Lehtola  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DEFERRED

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW)
               Flag|fedora-review?              |

[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434

Theodore Lee  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #24 from Theodore Lee  2011-02-12 01:04:00 EST ---
I would be willing to take a shot at packaging this if anyone's still
interested. I'll need a sponsor though. I have one pending package review (bug
639518), but I still need to get around to doing some informal reviews.