https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249172
Bug ID: 2249172 Summary: Review Request: localsend - An open source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: leo@craftcat.dev QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/localsend/blob/main/f/localsend.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/leo/localsend/fedora-39-x... RPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/leo/localsend/fedora-39-x... Description: LocalSend is a cross-platform app that enables secure communication between devices using a REST API and HTTPS encryption. Unlike other messaging apps that rely on external servers, LocalSend doesn't require an internet connection or third-party servers, making it a fast and reliable solution for local communication.
Fedora Account System Username: leo
Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108875920
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249172
Leo Puvilland leo@craftcat.dev changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249172
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6623867 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249172
Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |benson_muite@emailplus.org Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |benson_muite@emailplus.org Flags| |fedora-review? Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249172
--- Comment #2 from Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org --- Thanks for the contribution. The package needs to be built from source: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/what-can-be-packag... This would require flutter and dart base ecosystem to be packaged.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249172
--- Comment #3 from Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org --- Dart has many dependencies: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/blob/main/DEPS Might consider maintaining a copr build first. See https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/albertop/dart/ as an example starting point, though it also uses bundled dependencies. Version dependencies follow Googles live at head philosophy which may make updating a little time consuming.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249172
--- Comment #4 from Leo Puvilland leo@craftcat.dev --- Hi! I'll probably maintain and submit a COPR build of dart first to review. Should I close this bug or leave it open then? Thanks!
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org