Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: R-ACCLMA - R contrib package for ACC & LMA Graph Plotting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487
Summary: Review Request: R-ACCLMA - R contrib package for ACC & LMA Graph Plotting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkpai@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://pai.fedorapeople.org/R-ACCLMA.spec SRPM URL: http://pai.fedorapeople.org/R-ACCLMA-1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description:
This is a contrib package to the R software environment for statistical computing and graphics.
The R package summary is
[snip] The main function is plotLMA(sourcefile,header) that takes a data set and plots the appropriate LMA and ACC graphs. If no sourcefile (a string) was passed, a manual data entry window is opened. The header parameter indicates by TRUE/FALSE (false by default) if the source CSV file has a head row or not. The data set should contain only one independent variable (X) and one dependent varialbe (Y) and can contain a weight for each observation [/snip]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487
Madhavprasad Pai mkpai@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |noarch
--- Comment #1 from Madhavprasad Pai mkpai@redhat.com 2011-03-09 09:51:50 EST --- Need sponsor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487
José Matos jamatos@fc.up.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamatos@fc.up.pt
--- Comment #2 from José Matos jamatos@fc.up.pt 2011-03-11 19:19:53 EST --- I am a sponsor and I am willing to sponsor you.
Have you read the steps described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join ?
In order to access your understanding of the packaging rules you can review without approving other packages (until you are sponsored then, of course, you free and encouraged to review other packages) as can be seen in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
Regards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487
--- Comment #3 from Madhavprasad Pai mkpai@redhat.com 2011-03-16 07:53:11 EDT ---
Hello Jose',
Thank you for reviewing my request.
I have read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
I shall take up your suggestion and read other review requests at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html so that I can help others.
Thanks again and regards, -- Pai
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487
Pierre-YvesChibon pingou@pingoured.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou@pingoured.fr
--- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon pingou@pingoured.fr 2011-04-19 09:26:19 EDT --- Hello,
Please refers in this bug to informal review request you did or new package you submitted, this would help to sponsor your.
I am also sponsor and also willing to help you become a packager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487
--- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon pingou@pingoured.fr 2011-07-27 02:08:39 EDT --- ping ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487
--- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon pingou@pingoured.fr 2011-09-06 09:53:29 EDT --- ping ?
Without answer in a week, I will close this review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487
Pierre-YvesChibon pingou@pingoured.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Depends on| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2011-11-08 09:01:50
--- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon pingou@pingoured.fr 2011-11-08 09:01:50 EST --- Ok closing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683487
Pierre-YvesChibon pingou@pingoured.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Depends on|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) |
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org