Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
Summary: Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxx@krakoa.dk QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
Mads Villadsen maxx@krakoa.dk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525796
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2009-09-26 08:38:44 EDT --- Hello, your package doesnt build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1709089
You need to BR: intltool (at least)
Your devel package must also Requires: pkgconfig as it includes a .pc file
Please not also that the spec file posted here has a small diff against the one included in your srpm.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
--- Comment #2 from Mads Villadsen maxx@krakoa.dk 2009-09-26 16:43:19 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this. I updated the spec file and src.rpm, and I tested that it actually builds in koji this time.
http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey.spec http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-2.fc11.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
--- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2009-09-27 05:52:43 EDT --- Some other small issues, the doc dir under /usr/share/doc must be versioned /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}, and you should remove the generic INSTALL file which is irrelevant.
Which is your packager account? If you have one i'll take the review, otherwise i cannot sponsor you.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
--- Comment #4 from Mads Villadsen maxx@krakoa.dk 2009-09-27 08:03:36 EDT --- The doc issue is now fixed, and I have gotten rid of the INSTALL file.
My packager account name is maxx.
http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey.spec http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc11.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2009-09-27 11:22:01 EDT --- OK - rpmlint output 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is LGPLv3) OK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1711273 OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. bfdc73e68e9adbe0d506d31a25862914 gtkhotkey-0.2.1.tar.gz NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros OK - The package must contain code, or permissable content NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK - Header files must be in a -devel package (devel package present) NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) OK - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release
Package APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
Mads Villadsen maxx@krakoa.dk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Mads Villadsen maxx@krakoa.dk 2009-09-27 13:43:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgtkhotkey Short Description: Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications Owners: maxx Branches: F-11 InitialCC: maxx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2009-09-29 16:04:06 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-30 17:28:27 EDT --- libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-03 14:58:22 EDT --- libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-04 10:28:02 EDT --- libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc12
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org