[Bug 1884255] New: Review Request: python-patiencediff - Contains the implementation of the patiencediff algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
Bug ID: 1884255 Summary: Review Request: python-patiencediff - Contains the implementation of the patiencediff algorithm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: opohorel@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
SPEC URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/opohorel/public_git/python-patiencediff.git/tr... SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/opohorel/python-patiencediff-0.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Contains the implementation of the patiencediff algorithm. This package was separated from Breezy package. Fedora Account System Username: opohorel
Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52579868
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mhroncok@redhat.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mhroncok@redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Pasting URLs that lead to spec directly:
SPEC URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/opohorel/public_git/python-patiencediff.git/pl... SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/opohorel/python-patiencediff-0.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Spec sanity ===========
License: GNU GPLv2 or later
This is not a valid license tag, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#SoftwareLicenses
That should be:
License: GPLv2+
BTW upstream says GPLv2+ everywhere, but uses the 'License :: OSI Approved :: GNU General Public License v3 or later (GPLv3+)' classifier. Could you please contact them about the confusion?
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{pypi_name}}
If you target Fedora 33+ only, you don't need this. If you target older releases, you should use https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_the_py_pr... instead.
# Remove bundled egg-info rm -rf %{pypi_name}.egg-info
This is most likely not needed.
%{__python3} setup.py test
Please, use %{python3} rather than %{__python3}.
%{python3_sitearch}/%{pypi_name} %{python3_sitearch}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info
Please add trailing slashes to assert those are directories:
%{python3_sitearch}/%{pypi_name}/ %{python3_sitearch}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
--- Comment #3 from Ondřej Pohořelský opohorel@redhat.com --- Thank you for a helpful review!
I've made proposed changes to spec file and contacted upstream regarding license confusion[0]. They confirmed that license is GPLv2+ and that they are going to push fixed classifiers.
SPEC URL: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/opohorel/public_git/python-patiencediff.git/pl... SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/opohorel/python-patiencediff-0.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=52652247
[0]https://groups.google.com/g/breezy-vcs/c/xRhjYm8Zp7c/m/uoPtRB5BBwAJ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
python3-patiencediff.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/patiencediff/__init__.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python3-patiencediff.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/patiencediff/_patiencediff_py.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
Please, strip the shebangs and possibly send a suggestion upstream to do the same. _patiencediff_py.py does nothing when executed and packages should be executed by `python -m patiencediff`, not bu running __init__.py as a script.
Note that the README says:
Usage =====
To invoke patiencediff from the command-line::
python -m patiencediff file_a file_b
But that does not work:
<mock-chroot> sh-5.0# python3 -m patiencediff /usr/bin/python3: No module named patiencediff.__main__; 'patiencediff' is a package and cannot be directly executed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: so-files are Python extension modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License", "GPL (v2 or later)". [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [s]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [!]: Package functions as described. [?]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-patiencediff-0.2.0-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm python-patiencediff-debugsource-0.2.0-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm python-patiencediff-0.2.0-1.fc34.src.rpm python3-patiencediff.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US difflib -> diff lib, diff-lib, difficult python3-patiencediff.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US convience -> convince, convenience, convergence python3-patiencediff.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/patiencediff/__init__.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python3-patiencediff.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/patiencediff/_patiencediff_py.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python-patiencediff.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US difflib -> diff lib, diff-lib, difficult python-patiencediff.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US convience -> convince, convenience, convergence 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-patiencediff.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US difflib -> diff lib, diff-lib, difficult python3-patiencediff.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US convience -> convince, convenience, convergence python3-patiencediff.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/patiencediff/__init__.py 644 /usr/bin/env python python3-patiencediff.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/patiencediff/_patiencediff_py.py 644 /usr/bin/env python 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.
Unversioned so-files -------------------- python3-patiencediff: /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/patiencediff/_patiencediff_c.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/p/patiencediff/patiencediff-0... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d828c8dca0db860b26d441097e866a75f3ded8ea45244d3ba5f691a62928537a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d828c8dca0db860b26d441097e866a75f3ded8ea45244d3ba5f691a62928537a
Requires -------- python3-patiencediff (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH)
python-patiencediff-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides -------- python3-patiencediff: python-patiencediff python3-patiencediff python3-patiencediff(x86-64) python3.9-patiencediff python3.9dist(patiencediff) python3dist(patiencediff)
python-patiencediff-debugsource: python-patiencediff-debugsource python-patiencediff-debugsource(x86-64)
Generated by fedora-review 0.7.0 (fed5495) last change: 2019-03-17 Command line :try-fedora-review -b 1884255 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --mock-options=--enablerepo=local Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: C/C++, Python, Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: R, Java, fonts, SugarActivity, Haskell, Perl, Ocaml, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(opohorel@redhat.c | |om)
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Could you please work with upstream to fix the broken invocation? I can help, if needed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
Ondřej Pohořelský opohorel@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(opohorel@redhat.c | |om) |
--- Comment #7 from Ondřej Pohořelský opohorel@redhat.com --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #6)
Could you please work with upstream to fix the broken invocation? I can help, if needed.
I'm sorry for not posting the update. I wrote an e-mail to upstream[0]. I've got an off list reply that they fixed it in master. I'm going to rebase to new version and post fixed version of package here.
[0]https://groups.google.com/g/breezy-vcs/c/R-KhJ-iKVf4/m/xNAk_3jJCwAJ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Thanks for the update. Here's a followup from me: https://github.com/breezy-team/patiencediff/pull/5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
--- Comment #9 from Ondřej Pohořelský opohorel@redhat.com --- I rebased to newer version and added patch that fixes shebang in __main.py__
SPEC URL: https://people.redhat.com/opohorel/python-patiencediff.spec SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/opohorel/python-patiencediff-0.2.1-1.fc32.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
--- Comment #10 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Every patch should be justified in spec and/or link to upstream. In this case, I suggest to use:
# Remove redundant shebang and conditional from __main__.py Patch1: https://github.com/breezy-team/patiencediff/pull/5.patch
Instead of a different version of the same.
-----
If you'd like to avoid the patch, you can strip the shebang in %prep with:
# remove a useless shebang; fixed in upstream git sed -i '1{/^#!/d}' patiencediff/__main__.py
-----
It appears that the tarball used to build the package is not the same tarball as located on the Source url:
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/p/patiencediff/patiencediff-0... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : cde3ece054837358d3c64b8fd18d3e15ead5b07d8f6d20bdfacce92d8725e506 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 9b0a00a0ec3e9fd90c3c3a280065a7c35315c8ed3f93520da0a9bcd70511a25a
-----
rpmlint:
python3-patiencediff.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US difflib -> diff lib, diff-lib, difficult python3-patiencediff.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US convience -> convince, convenience, convergence python3-patiencediff.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/patiencediff/_patiencediff_py.py 644 /usr/bin/env python 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
"difflib" is probably a technical term, but "convience" seems to be an actual typo. I suggest to fix it in the %description and send a PR upstream with the same.
_patiencediff_py.py still has an useless shebang. It can be removed together with the other shebang:
# remove useless shebangs; fixed in upstream git sed -i '1{/^#!/d}' patiencediff/*.py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
--- Comment #11 from Ondřej Pohořelský opohorel@redhat.com --- I went with Patch approach. Different tarball checksum is my mistake as I took new version from GitHub instead of PyPi. Should be fixed now. "difflib" points to Python library, so that's not a spelling error. "convience" is a typo, I've made a upstream PR and added it as a patch[0] Thank you very much for pointing these issues out and helping me resolve it!
[0]https://github.com/breezy-team/patiencediff/pull/6
SPEC URL: https://people.redhat.com/opohorel/python-patiencediff.spec SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/opohorel/python-patiencediff-0.2.1-1.fc32.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Package is APPROVED. Thanks for all the changes!
I would not insist on patching the README in the package for the sake of the typo but since it is already there, feel free to keep it.
===== MUST items =====
C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files are Python extension modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later". [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. [-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-patiencediff-0.2.1-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm python-patiencediff-debugsource-0.2.1-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm python-patiencediff-0.2.1-1.fc34.src.rpm python3-patiencediff.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US difflib -> diff lib, diff-lib, difficult python-patiencediff.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US difflib -> diff lib, diff-lib, difficult 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-patiencediff.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US difflib -> diff lib, diff-lib, difficult 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Unversioned so-files -------------------- python3-patiencediff: /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/patiencediff/_patiencediff_c.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/p/patiencediff/patiencediff-0... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 9b0a00a0ec3e9fd90c3c3a280065a7c35315c8ed3f93520da0a9bcd70511a25a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 9b0a00a0ec3e9fd90c3c3a280065a7c35315c8ed3f93520da0a9bcd70511a25a
Requires -------- python3-patiencediff (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH)
python-patiencediff-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides -------- python3-patiencediff: python-patiencediff python3-patiencediff python3-patiencediff(x86-64) python3.9-patiencediff python3.9dist(patiencediff) python3dist(patiencediff)
python-patiencediff-debugsource: python-patiencediff-debugsource python-patiencediff-debugsource(x86-64)
Generated by fedora-review 0.7.0 (fed5495) last change: 2019-03-17 Command line :try-fedora-review -b 1884255 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --mock-options=--enablerepo=local Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Python, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Ocaml, R, SugarActivity, PHP, Haskell, Ruby, Java, fonts, Perl Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla gwync@protonmail.com --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-patiencediff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
--- Comment #14 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Three recommended actions after adding the package:
1) enable koschei tracking once available: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/python-patiencediff?collection=f34 2) add @python-sig group to: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-patiencediff/addgroup 3) add/edit the upstream package to/at https://release-monitoring.org/ and pair it with Fedora's python-patiencediff package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884255
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2020-11-03 21:24:53
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com