[Bug 2362926] New: Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc-re - Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362926
Bug ID: 2362926 Summary: Review Request: python-flask-xml-rpc-re - Adds support for creating XML-RPC APIs to Flask Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: aurelien@bompard.org QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-flask-xml-rpc-re/python-fla... SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-flask-xml-rpc-re/python-fla... Description: Flask-XML-RPC-Re adds XML-RPC support to Flask. This way, you can provide simple APIs easily accessible from almost any programming language. Fedora Account System Username: abompard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362926
Ben Beasley code@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |code@musicinmybrain.net
--- Comment #1 from Ben Beasley code@musicinmybrain.net --- DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: DEBUG util.py:459: No match for argument: python3dist(nose) DEBUG util.py:459: You can try to add to command line: DEBUG util.py:459: --skip-unavailable to skip unavailable packages
Since python-nose has been deprecated since Fedora 32 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose), you cannot depend on it. Since python-nose was retired for Fedora 43 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePythonNose), you *really* cannot depend on it. Please find another way to run the tests.
Please consider not building and shipping the Sphinx-generated HTML documentation; as noted in bug 2006555, there are issues with bundled JavaScript, fonts, and so on. Recent FESCo decisions have made it more practical to handle this, but you still have to account for all the licenses of everything copied into the binary RPMs by Sphinx.
As this is a new package, please use the current Python guidelines https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/, based on pyproject-rpm-macros, rather than https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python_201x/.
I am sure you are aware that this package is dead upstream, with the last commit seven years ago. This doesn’t prevent packaging it, but it does mean you should probably think twice about whether you really need it, and it means you shoulder a greater burden on to deal with bugs and compatibility issues with no upstream assistance.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362926
Terje Rosten terjeros@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Terje Rosten terjeros@gmail.com --- Seems like upstream has migrated to nose2 now, however new set of rpm macros should be used.
See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateSetuppyMacros https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362926
Ben Beasley code@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(aurelien@bompard. | |org)
--- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley code@musicinmybrain.net --- Are you still working on this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362926
Aurelien Bompard aurelien@bompard.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED Flags|needinfo?(aurelien@bompard. | |org) | Last Closed| |2025-11-07 14:12:20
--- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard aurelien@bompard.org --- No, I'd rather drop this dependency from the application I need to package.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com