Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools-0.17-1.src.rpm Description:
mono-tools allows user access to the monodoc package as a normal application rather than having to fire up monodevelop all of the time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-10-14 18:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools-1.1.17-1.src.rpm
Dammit - version number was wrong!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2006-10-15 22:12 EST ------- I don't really feel competent to review mono packages, but here are a few generic comments:
Is the name of the package "monotools" or "mono-tools"?
The URL seems to be incorrect.
It's up to you whether you separate BuildRequires: with spaces or commas, but you should be consistent.
The %description is a bit content-free.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2006-11-27 22:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1)
SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools-1.1.17-1.src.rpm
404'd, what's the latest SRPM URL?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-30 20:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-2.src.rpm
Lots of changes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
jpmahowald@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald@gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-01-06 21:32 EST ------- Doesn't build, missing gecko-sharp, gconf-sharp, and %find_lang doesn't find any langs.
A spec that addresses these: http://fedorared.org/repos/rpmbuild/SPECS/mono-tools.spec
The Summary doesn't seem to go with the %description, these are mono tools and not necessarily a documentation system. The description in the included README seems closer.
URL is 404'd.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-01-18 17:58 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-3.src.rpm
Fixes the above, but I must disagree, find lang does find languages.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-01-23 09:42 EST ------- I did build it in mock, development x86_64
Adding BuildRequires: gettext seems to fix the languages thing.
I also get a warning from the desktop file: /var/tmp/mono-tools-1.2.1-4.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora-monodoc.desktop: warning: The 'Application' cate gory is not defined by the desktop entry specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Ed ucation", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility" instead
Possibly Development would be appropriate.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-01-28 08:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-4.src.rpm
Address the above
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-01-30 01:08 EST ------- - devel package missing %defattr - missing SMP flags or note why not
- does not run on x86_64. $ monodoc /usr/bin/monodoc: line 7: libdir: command not found cannot open assembly /monodoc/browser.exe
It appears the build did not automatically substitute the libdir variable.
create-native-map also has problems: $ create-native-map cannot open assembly /usr/bin/../lib/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe
which is in the right spot under /usr/lib64
gnunit and gnunit2 aren't working either: $ gnunit2 Unhandled Exception: Glade.HandlerNotFoundException: The handler for the event DeleteEvent should take '(System.Object,Gtk.DeleteEventArgs)', but the signature of the provided handler ('OnWindowDelete') is '(System.Object,System.EventArgs)'
rpmlint sez: E: mono-tools hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib Conditional for pre mono libdir Fedora. OK.
E: mono-tools no-binary E: mono-tools only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Ignore, we don't consider mono noarch
E: mono-tools zero-length /usr/share/doc/mono-tools-1.2.1/NEWS Content free. May rm.
E: mono-tools script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/mono-tools-1.2.1/COPYING Weird. Recommend removing the exec bit.
W: mono-tools-devel summary-not-capitalized .pc file for mono-tools Ignore
W: mono-tools-devel no-documentation Ignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-02-15 20:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.3-1.src.rpm
Got everything except gnunit(2) to work. I've reported these upstream, but there doesn't seem to be a way to switch them off during the build - I've therefore excluded them from being added to the final RPMs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-02-18 02:28 EST ------- Nope. 1.2.3-1 doesn't build on x86_64.
make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-tools-1.2.3/create-nati ve-map/src' /usr/bin/gmcs -d:TRACE -debug+ -out:/usr/lib/create-native-map/create-native-m ap.exe -target:exe -r:Mono.Posix.dll ./create-native-map.cs ./MapAttribute.cs ./create-native-map.cs(387,22): warning CS0169: The private method `MapUtils.Ge tPropertyValueAsBool(object, string)' is never used ./create-native-map.cs(1042,15): warning CS0169: The private method `HeaderFile Generator.WriteParameterDeclaration(System.Reflection.ParameterInfo)' is never used error CS0016: Could not write to file `/usr/lib/create-native-map/create-native -map.exe', cause: Could not find a part of the path "/usr/lib/create-native-map ". Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 2 warnings make[2]: *** [/usr/lib/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe] Error 1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-02-18 04:14 EST ------- Is that inside or outside of mock? It's building fine here (mock x86, outside x86_64)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-02-19 16:19 EST ------- Build failed inside mock, FC6 x86_64.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-02-22 20:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.3-2.src.rpm
Should fix the x86_64 problem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium
jpmahowald@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-05-23 22:47 EST ------- Sorry for the delay.
Same error, but at least has lib64...
make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-tools-1.2.3/create-native-map/src' /usr/bin/gmcs -d:TRACE -debug+ -out:/usr/lib64/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe -target:exe -r:Mono.Posix.dll ./creat e-native-map.cs ./MapAttribute.cs ./create-native-map.cs(387,22): warning CS0169: The private method `MapUtils.GetPropertyValueAsBool(object, string)' is never used ./create-native-map.cs(1042,15): warning CS0169: The private method `HeaderFileGenerator.WriteParameterDeclaration(System.Ref lection.ParameterInfo)' is never used error CS0016: Could not write to file `/usr/lib64/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe', cause: Could not find a part of the path "/usr/lib64/create-native-map". Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 2 warnings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-04 07:37 EST ------- Updated
src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm spec : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools.spec
Quite a lot of fixes included in it!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From david@lovesunix.net 2008-01-04 15:21 EST ------- And if you could just adjust that license tag :)
John owns the review but if he has no time or interest in finishing it I would like to offer to do so.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jpmahowald@gmail.c | |om)
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-04 19:03 EST ------- Updated
src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-2.fc9.src.rpm
Fixed!
Not sure if John has vanished....
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-06 17:40 EST ------- John - you out there?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-14 12:12 EST ------- I think it's safe to say John has vanished. Dave, do you want to take this over?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
david@lovesunix.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpmahowald@gmail.com |david@lovesunix.net
------- Additional Comments From david@lovesunix.net 2008-01-14 13:21 EST ------- GOOD: Builds in mock (fedora-development-x86_64) Spec is in readable US English, and sexy sed magic Cleans up after itself Owns all the good stuff
BAD: mono-tools.src: W: strange-permission mono-tools.patch 0600 File permissions should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) Should excludearch ppc64 on account of #241850 - remember to add a note please (I suspect I forgot this in the previous mono reviews - please apply liberally to mono specs)
mergh?: I'm still not liking that whole defining the libdir thing, it seems like a build system bug which we are hiding but in this case it's even uglier than before. Please consider removing the define and just invoking %{_libdir} as an argument to configure. You might also want to expand the description a bit so it makes more sense for users such as which tools this package provides.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-16 05:59 EST ------- src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm spec : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools.spec
Fixed the BAD & mergh? stuff. I'll remove the %monodir define next build.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-16 05:59 EST ------- src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-3.fc9.src.rpm
Doh!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
david@lovesunix.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(jpmahowald@gmail.c| |om) |
------- Additional Comments From david@lovesunix.net 2008-01-16 11:38 EST ------- I'm pleased now, I have no complaints left - aside naturally a request that you add a note why we excludearch ppc64 with a reference to the #241850 so one day in the future everyone can remember why we do that.. hopefully we can get that bug closed soon and this won't be needed.
APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From david@lovesunix.net 2008-01-26 22:28 EST ------- ping?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-27 14:42 EST ------- Sorry about that. My main box has thrown a wobbler and I'm trying to get things working on it again! Not long now....
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser@gmail.com 2008-04-18 08:49 EST ------- Paul are you okay, it has been months and I am getting worried.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-04-21 06:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-tools Short Description: mono-tools are a small series of tools which allows the likes of monodoc to be used outside of monodevelop Owners: pfj Branches: f9,f8, f7 InitialCC: pfj Cvsextras Commits: yes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@gmail.com 2008-04-21 06:28 EST ------- Hello Paul,
Could you add me to this package, if you don't mind ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-04-21 06:38 EST ------- Sure, what do I need to add to the initalCC for it?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@gmail.com 2008-04-21 07:38 EST ------- Just re-post a cvs request by adding my fas name to the initialCC (which's laxathom)
Thx.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-04-21 07:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-tools Short Description: mono-tools are a small series of tools which allows the likes of monodoc to be used outside of monodevelop Owners: pfj Branches: f9,f8, f7 InitialCC: pfj,laxathom Cvsextras Commits: yes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:01 EST ------- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org