[Bug 210776] New: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop - package-review

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

[Bug 210776] New: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

older

[Bug 445386] New: Review Request:...

[Bug 171993] Review Request:...

Red Hat Bugzilla

15 Oct 2006 15 Oct '06

12:09 a.m.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com

Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools-0.17-1.src.rpm Description:

mono-tools allows user access to the monodoc package as a normal application rather than having to fire up monodevelop all of the time

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Show replies by date

Red Hat Bugzilla

15 Oct 15 Oct

12:12 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-10-14 18:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools-1.1.17-1.src.rpm

Dammit - version number was wrong!

Red Hat Bugzilla

16 Oct 16 Oct

4:12 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2006-10-15 22:12 EST ------- I don't really feel competent to review mono packages, but here are a few generic comments:

Is the name of the package "monotools" or "mono-tools"?

The URL seems to be incorrect.

It's up to you whether you separate BuildRequires: with spaces or commas, but you should be consistent.

The %description is a bit content-free.

Red Hat Bugzilla

28 Nov 28 Nov

4:30 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2006-11-27 22:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1)

...

SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools-1.1.17-1.src.rpm

404'd, what's the latest SRPM URL?

Red Hat Bugzilla

1 Dec 1 Dec

2:02 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-30 20:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-2.src.rpm

Lots of changes

Red Hat Bugzilla

7 Jan 7 Jan

3:33 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

jpmahowald@gmail.com changed:

------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-01-06 21:32 EST ------- Doesn't build, missing gecko-sharp, gconf-sharp, and %find_lang doesn't find any langs.

A spec that addresses these: http://fedorared.org/repos/rpmbuild/SPECS/mono-tools.spec

The Summary doesn't seem to go with the %description, these are mono tools and not necessarily a documentation system. The description in the included README seems closer.

URL is 404'd.

Red Hat Bugzilla

18 Jan 18 Jan

11:58 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-01-18 17:58 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-3.src.rpm

Fixes the above, but I must disagree, find lang does find languages.

Red Hat Bugzilla

23 Jan 23 Jan

3:42 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-01-23 09:42 EST ------- I did build it in mock, development x86_64

Adding BuildRequires: gettext seems to fix the languages thing.

I also get a warning from the desktop file: /var/tmp/mono-tools-1.2.1-4.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora-monodoc.desktop: warning: The 'Application' cate gory is not defined by the desktop entry specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Ed ucation", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility" instead

Possibly Development would be appropriate.

Red Hat Bugzilla

28 Jan 28 Jan

2:42 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-01-28 08:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-4.src.rpm

Address the above

Red Hat Bugzilla

30 Jan 30 Jan

7:08 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-01-30 01:08 EST ------- - devel package missing %defattr - missing SMP flags or note why not

- does not run on x86_64. $ monodoc /usr/bin/monodoc: line 7: libdir: command not found cannot open assembly /monodoc/browser.exe

It appears the build did not automatically substitute the libdir variable.

create-native-map also has problems: $ create-native-map cannot open assembly /usr/bin/../lib/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe

which is in the right spot under /usr/lib64

gnunit and gnunit2 aren't working either: $ gnunit2 Unhandled Exception: Glade.HandlerNotFoundException: The handler for the event DeleteEvent should take '(System.Object,Gtk.DeleteEventArgs)', but the signature of the provided handler ('OnWindowDelete') is '(System.Object,System.EventArgs)'

rpmlint sez: E: mono-tools hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib Conditional for pre mono libdir Fedora. OK.

E: mono-tools no-binary E: mono-tools only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Ignore, we don't consider mono noarch

E: mono-tools zero-length /usr/share/doc/mono-tools-1.2.1/NEWS Content free. May rm.

E: mono-tools script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/mono-tools-1.2.1/COPYING Weird. Recommend removing the exec bit.

W: mono-tools-devel summary-not-capitalized .pc file for mono-tools Ignore

W: mono-tools-devel no-documentation Ignore

Red Hat Bugzilla

16 Feb 16 Feb

2:22 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-02-15 20:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.3-1.src.rpm

Got everything except gnunit(2) to work. I've reported these upstream, but there doesn't seem to be a way to switch them off during the build - I've therefore excluded them from being added to the final RPMs.

Red Hat Bugzilla

18 Feb 18 Feb

8:28 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-02-18 02:28 EST ------- Nope. 1.2.3-1 doesn't build on x86_64.

make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-tools-1.2.3/create-nati ve-map/src' /usr/bin/gmcs -d:TRACE -debug+ -out:/usr/lib/create-native-map/create-native-m ap.exe -target:exe -r:Mono.Posix.dll ./create-native-map.cs ./MapAttribute.cs ./create-native-map.cs(387,22): warning CS0169: The private method `MapUtils.Ge tPropertyValueAsBool(object, string)' is never used ./create-native-map.cs(1042,15): warning CS0169: The private method `HeaderFile Generator.WriteParameterDeclaration(System.Reflection.ParameterInfo)' is never used error CS0016: Could not write to file `/usr/lib/create-native-map/create-native -map.exe', cause: Could not find a part of the path "/usr/lib/create-native-map ". Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 2 warnings make[2]: *** [/usr/lib/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe] Error 1

Red Hat Bugzilla

10:14 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-02-18 04:14 EST ------- Is that inside or outside of mock? It's building fine here (mock x86, outside x86_64)

Red Hat Bugzilla

19 Feb 19 Feb

10:19 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-02-19 16:19 EST ------- Build failed inside mock, FC6 x86_64.

Red Hat Bugzilla

23 Feb 23 Feb

2:08 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-02-22 20:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.3-2.src.rpm

Should fix the x86_64 problem

Red Hat Bugzilla

24 May 24 May

4:47 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

bugzilla@redhat.com changed:

jpmahowald@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?

------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@gmail.com 2007-05-23 22:47 EST ------- Sorry for the delay.

Same error, but at least has lib64...

make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-tools-1.2.3/create-native-map/src' /usr/bin/gmcs -d:TRACE -debug+ -out:/usr/lib64/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe -target:exe -r:Mono.Posix.dll ./creat e-native-map.cs ./MapAttribute.cs ./create-native-map.cs(387,22): warning CS0169: The private method `MapUtils.GetPropertyValueAsBool(object, string)' is never used ./create-native-map.cs(1042,15): warning CS0169: The private method `HeaderFileGenerator.WriteParameterDeclaration(System.Ref lection.ParameterInfo)' is never used error CS0016: Could not write to file `/usr/lib64/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe', cause: Could not find a part of the path "/usr/lib64/create-native-map". Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 2 warnings

Red Hat Bugzilla

4 Jan 4 Jan

1:37 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

bugzilla@redhat.com changed:

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-04 07:37 EST ------- Updated

src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm spec : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools.spec

Quite a lot of fixes included in it!

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

9:21 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From david@lovesunix.net 2008-01-04 15:21 EST ------- And if you could just adjust that license tag :)

John owns the review but if he has no time or interest in finishing it I would like to offer to do so.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

5 Jan 5 Jan

1:03 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-04 19:03 EST ------- Updated

src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-2.fc9.src.rpm

Fixed!

Not sure if John has vanished....

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

6 Jan 6 Jan

11:40 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-06 17:40 EST ------- John - you out there?

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

14 Jan 14 Jan

6:12 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-14 12:12 EST ------- I think it's safe to say John has vanished. Dave, do you want to take this over?

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

7:21 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

david@lovesunix.net changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpmahowald@gmail.com |david@lovesunix.net

------- Additional Comments From david@lovesunix.net 2008-01-14 13:21 EST ------- GOOD: Builds in mock (fedora-development-x86_64) Spec is in readable US English, and sexy sed magic Cleans up after itself Owns all the good stuff

BAD: mono-tools.src: W: strange-permission mono-tools.patch 0600 File permissions should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) Should excludearch ppc64 on account of #241850 - remember to add a note please (I suspect I forgot this in the previous mono reviews - please apply liberally to mono specs)

mergh?: I'm still not liking that whole defining the libdir thing, it seems like a build system bug which we are hiding but in this case it's even uglier than before. Please consider removing the define and just invoking %{_libdir} as an argument to configure. You might also want to expand the description a bit so it makes more sense for users such as which tools this package provides.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

16 Jan 16 Jan

11:59 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-16 05:59 EST ------- src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm spec : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools.spec

Fixed the BAD & mergh? stuff. I'll remove the %monodir define next build.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

11:59 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-16 05:59 EST ------- src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-3.fc9.src.rpm

Doh!

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

5:38 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

david@lovesunix.net changed:

------- Additional Comments From david@lovesunix.net 2008-01-16 11:38 EST ------- I'm pleased now, I have no complaints left - aside naturally a request that you add a note why we excludearch ppc64 with a reference to the #241850 so one day in the future everyone can remember why we do that.. hopefully we can get that bug closed soon and this won't be needed.

APPROVED

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

20 Jan 20 Jan

12:55 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

27 Jan 27 Jan

4:28 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From david@lovesunix.net 2008-01-26 22:28 EST ------- ping?

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

8:42 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-27 14:42 EST ------- Sorry about that. My main box has thrown a wobbler and I'm trying to get things working on it again! Not long now....

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

18 Apr 18 Apr

2:49 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser@gmail.com 2008-04-18 08:49 EST ------- Paul are you okay, it has been months and I am getting worried.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

21 Apr 21 Apr

12:05 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-04-21 06:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-tools Short Description: mono-tools are a small series of tools which allows the likes of monodoc to be used outside of monodevelop Owners: pfj Branches: f9,f8, f7 InitialCC: pfj Cvsextras Commits: yes

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

12:28 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@gmail.com 2008-04-21 06:28 EST ------- Hello Paul,

Could you add me to this package, if you don't mind ?

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

12:38 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-04-21 06:38 EST ------- Sure, what do I need to add to the initalCC for it?

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:38 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@gmail.com 2008-04-21 07:38 EST ------- Just re-post a cvs request by adding my fas name to the initialCC (which's laxathom)

Thx.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:52 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-04-21 07:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-tools Short Description: mono-tools are a small series of tools which allows the likes of monodoc to be used outside of monodevelop Owners: pfj Branches: f9,f8, f7 InitialCC: pfj,laxathom Cvsextras Commits: yes

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

22 Apr 22 Apr

7:01 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

kevin@tummy.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+

------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:01 EST ------- cvs done.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Red Hat Bugzilla

13 May 13 May

2:58 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776

paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

6280

Age (days ago)

6857

Last active (days ago)

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

35 comments

1 participants

tags (0)

participants (1)

Red Hat Bugzilla