[Bug 1333933] New: Review Request: libixpdimm-api - API for development of ixpdimm sw management utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Bug ID: 1333933 Summary: Review Request: libixpdimm-api - API for development of ixpdimm sw management utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: namratha.n.kothapalli@intel.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://github.com/01org/IXPDIMMSW/releases/download/v01.00.00.2049/ixpdimm_...
SRPM URL: https://github.com/01org/IXPDIMMSW/releases/libixpdimm-api-01.00.00.2055-1.f...
Description: An application program interface (API) for configuring and managing ixpdimm_sw. Including basic inventory, capacity provisioning, health monitoring, and troubleshooting.
Fedora Account System Username:nkothapa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Namratha Kothapalli namratha.n.kothapalli@intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hardware|All |x86_64 Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |namratha.n.kothapalli@intel | |.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan.j.williams@intel.com Assignee|namratha.n.kothapalli@intel |dan.j.williams@intel.com |.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |namratha.n.kothapalli@intel | |.com Flags| |needinfo?(namratha.n.kothap | |alli@intel.com)
--- Comment #1 from Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com --- I get a 404 accessing: https://github.com/01org/IXPDIMMSW/releases/libixpdimm-api-01.00.00.2055-1.f...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Namratha Kothapalli namratha.n.kothapalli@intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(namratha.n.kothap | |alli@intel.com) |
--- Comment #2 from Namratha Kothapalli namratha.n.kothapalli@intel.com --- Fixed it.
SRPM URL: https://github.com/01org/IXPDIMMSW/releases/download/v01.00.00.2049/libixpdi...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #3 from Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com --- Tooling expects that the spec file name matches the package name, for example:
$ fedora-review --rpm-spec -n libixpdimm-api-01.00.00.2049-1.fc23.src.rpm INFO: Processing local files: libixpdimm-api-01.00.00.2049-1.fc23.src.rpm INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : Local files in ~ INFO: --> SRPM url: file://~/libixpdimm-api-01.00.00.2049-1.fc23.src.rpm INFO: Using review directory: ~/libixpdimm-api ERROR: 'Cannot find spec file in srpm' (logs in ~/.cache/fedora-review.log)
...because:
$ rpm -qlp libixpdimm-api-01.00.00.2049-1.fc23.src.rpm ixpdimm_sw.spec ixpdimm_sw.tar.bz2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #4 from Namratha Kothapalli namratha.n.kothapalli@intel.com --- Updated the spec per above comment.
Spec URL: https://github.com/01org/IXPDIMMSW/releases/download/v01.00.00.2049/ixpdimm_...
SRPM URL: https://github.com/01org/IXPDIMMSW/releases/download/v01.00.00.2049/ixpdimm_...
rpmlint ixpdimm_sw-01.00.00.2049-1.fc23.src.rpm ixpdimm_sw.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog ixpdimm_sw.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ixpdimm_sw.tar.bz2 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
rpmlint ixpdimm_sw.spec ixpdimm_sw.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: ixpdimm_sw.tar.bz2 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #5 from Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com --- (In reply to Namratha Kothapalli from comment #4)
Updated the spec per above comment.
Spec URL: https://github.com/01org/IXPDIMMSW/releases/download/v01.00.00.2049/ ixpdimm_sw.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/01org/IXPDIMMSW/releases/download/v01.00.00.2049/ ixpdimm_sw-01.00.00.2049-1.fc23.src.rpm
rpmlint ixpdimm_sw-01.00.00.2049-1.fc23.src.rpm ixpdimm_sw.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
Fix this by using the right format for the changelog. It's missing the version number on the entry line. For example:
* Mon Apr 04 2016 Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com - 52-1 - Initial rpm submission to Fedora
ixpdimm_sw.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ixpdimm_sw.tar.bz2
Fix this by referencing the url of the source archive on github:
https://github.com/01org/IXPDIMMSW/archive/v01.00.00.2049.tar.gz
...actually you seem to have the same problem that ndctl had prior to Jeff's recent comment [1]. The source package should be in "package-version" format. For ndctl I fixed it by changing tag names from "v52" to "ndctl-52".
[1]: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2016-May/005679.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #6 from Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com --- This package does not build:
Getting requirements for ixpdimm_sw-01.00.00.2049-1.fc24.src --> ctemplate-devel-2.3-6.fc24.x86_64 --> kmod-devel-22-4.fc24.x86_64 --> ndctl-devel-52-1.fc24.x86_64 --> sqlite-devel-3.11.0-3.fc24.x86_64 Error: No Package found for libintelnvm-cim Error: No Package found for libintelnvm-cim-devel Error: No Package found for libintelnvm-cli Error: No Package found for libintelnvm-cli-devel Error: No Package found for libintelnvm-i18n Error: No Package found for libintelnvm-i18n-devel
So, as far as I can see, we either need to complete the review of those packages as pre-requisites first, or roll them all into this single spec file so all dependencies are local.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Janet Morgan jamorgan@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1270993
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Namratha Kothapalli namratha.n.kothapalli@intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: ixpdimm_sw |libixpdimm-api - API for |- API for development of |development of ixpdimm sw |IXPDIMM management |management utilities |utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #7 from Namratha Kothapalli namratha.n.kothapalli@intel.com --- Incorporated feedback received from prerequisite packages.
Spec URL: https://github.com/01org/ixpdimm_sw/releases/download/v01.00.00.2095/ixpdimm...
SRPM URL: https://github.com/01org/ixpdimm_sw/releases/download/v01.00.00.2095/ixpdimm...
rpmlint output - ixpdimm_sw]# rpmlint output/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ ixpdimm_sw-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[root@fedorabuild ixpdimm_sw]# rpmlint output/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root@fedorabuild ixpdimm_sw]# vi install/linux/rel-release/ixpdimm_sw.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #8 from Namratha Kothapalli namratha.n.kothapalli@intel.com --- Latest code and specs -
Spec URL: https://github.com/01org/ixpdimm_sw/releases/download/v01.00.00.2104/ixpdimm...
SRPM URL: https://github.com/01org/ixpdimm_sw/releases/download/v01.00.00.2104/ixpdimm...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #9 from Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com --- I am unable to build this package due to missing ctemplate in Rawhide.
ctemplate package only exists in Fedora 23, but has been marked as retired/orphaned for all Fedora releases after 23 as well as EPEL.
See: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ctemplate/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #10 from Namratha Kothapalli namratha.n.kothapalli@intel.com --- I asked for "unretirement" of ctemplate package, and it should be available now in Rawhide.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #11 from Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com --- I grabbed the latest 2104 and hit some missing BuildRequires:
Index: SPECS/ixpdimm_sw.spec =================================================================== --- SPECS.orig/ixpdimm_sw.spec +++ SPECS/ixpdimm_sw.spec @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ Requires: libinvm-cim >= 1.0.0.1040 BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libkmod) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(sqlite3) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libndctl) +BuildRequires: pkgconfig(openssl) +BuildRequires: numactl-devel +BuildRequires: sblim-cmpi-devel BuildRequires: libinvm-i18n-devel BuildRequires: libinvm-cim-devel BuildRequires: libinvm-cli-devel
I then hit this compilation error:
logic/PostLayoutRequestDeviationCheck.cpp: In member function 'double wbem::logic::PostLayoutRequestDeviationCheck::findPercentDeviation(NVM_UINT64, NVM_UINT64)': logic/PostLayoutRequestDeviationCheck.cpp:52:57: error: call of overloaded 'abs(NVM_UINT64)' is ambiguous return (double)100.0 * (abs(observedValue-expectedValue))/expectedValue;
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #12 from Namratha Kothapalli namratha.n.kothapalli@intel.com --- Here's the result of a fedora-review run with the rest of the template filled out:
===== MUST items =====
C/C++: [-]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [-]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 20 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/namu/1333933-ixpdimm_sw/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/cmpi [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libixpdimm-cim , ixpdimm-monitor , ixpdimm-cli , ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define build_version 01.00.00.2104, %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: ixpdimm_sw-01.00.00.2104-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm ixpdimm_sw-devel-01.00.00.2104-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm libixpdimm-core-01.00.00.2104-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm libixpdimm-cim-01.00.00.2104-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm ixpdimm-monitor-01.00.00.2104-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm ixpdimm-cli-01.00.00.2104-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo-01.00.00.2104-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm ixpdimm_sw-01.00.00.2104-1.fc26.src.rpm ixpdimm_sw-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo-01.00.00.2104-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- libixpdimm-core.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ixpdimm -> dimmed libixpdimm-core.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sw -> SW, aw, sq ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ixpdimm -> dimmed ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sw -> SW, aw, sq ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ixpdimm -> dimmed ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sw -> SW, aw, sq ixpdimm_sw-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ixpdimm -> dimmed ixpdimm_sw-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sw -> SW, aw, sq ixpdimm_sw-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ixpdimm -> dimmed ixpdimm_sw-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sw -> SW, aw, sq ixpdimm_sw-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.
Requires -------- libixpdimm-core (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig ixpdimm_sw(x86-64) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10(libcrypto.so.10)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libixpdimm.so.01()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)
ixpdimm-cli (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10(libcrypto.so.10)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libinvm-cim.so.1()(64bit) libinvm-cli.so.1()(64bit) libinvm-i18n.so.1()(64bit) libixpdimm-cim(x86-64) libixpdimm-cim.so.01()(64bit) libixpdimm-core.so.01()(64bit) libixpdimm.so.01()(64bit) libkmod.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libndctl.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)
ixpdimm-monitor (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10(libcrypto.so.10)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libinvm-i18n.so.1()(64bit) libixpdimm-cim(x86-64) libixpdimm.so.01()(64bit) libkmod.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libndctl.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit) libssl.so.10()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) systemd-units
ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libixpdimm-cim (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /sbin/ldconfig config(libixpdimm-cim) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10(libcrypto.so.10)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libinvm-cim.so.1()(64bit) libinvm-i18n.so.1()(64bit) libixpdimm-core(x86-64) libixpdimm-core.so.01()(64bit) libixpdimm.so.01()(64bit) libkmod.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libndctl.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit) libssl.so.10()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) pywbem rtld(GNU_HASH)
ixpdimm_sw (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig config(ixpdimm_sw) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10(libcrypto.so.10)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libinvm-cim libinvm-cli libinvm-i18n libinvm-i18n.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libndctl.so.6()(64bit) libndctl.so.6(LIBNDCTL_1)(64bit) libndctl.so.6(LIBNDCTL_3)(64bit) libnuma.so.1()(64bit) libnuma.so.1(libnuma_1.1)(64bit) libnuma.so.1(libnuma_1.2)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) ndctl-libs rtld(GNU_HASH)
ixpdimm_sw-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ixpdimm_sw(x86-64) libixpdimm-cim.so.01()(64bit) libixpdimm-cli.so.01()(64bit) libixpdimm-core.so.01()(64bit) libixpdimm.so.01()(64bit)
Provides -------- libixpdimm-core: libixpdimm-core libixpdimm-core(x86-64) libixpdimm-core.so.01()(64bit)
ixpdimm-cli: ixpdimm-cli ixpdimm-cli(x86-64) libixpdimm-cli.so.01()(64bit)
ixpdimm-monitor: ixpdimm-monitor ixpdimm-monitor(x86-64)
ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo: ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo ixpdimm_sw-debuginfo(x86-64)
libixpdimm-cim: config(libixpdimm-cim) libixpdimm-cim libixpdimm-cim(x86-64) libixpdimm-cim.so.01()(64bit)
ixpdimm_sw: config(ixpdimm_sw) ixpdimm_sw ixpdimm_sw(x86-64) libixpdimm.so.01()(64bit)
ixpdimm_sw-devel: ixpdimm_sw-devel ixpdimm_sw-devel(x86-64)
Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/01org/ixpdimm_sw/archive/v01.00.00.2104.tar.gz#/ixpdimm_s... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : e54a8bbb67ef389ca11f0faa1d6375db35bc3aece4f852007ca0f95ed7f6ff8a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e8f4478d4ae8d5b788122b64af54ae2802b36c6230ede953e03feb09683f72fe However, diff -r shows no differences
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1333933 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com --- Looks ok to me. Longer term we might consider collapsing these packages into a smaller set, but I don't see that as a blocker.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ixpdimm_sw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Rutvij Karkhanis rutvij.g.karkhanis@intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1478977
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478977 [Bug 1478977] The maintainer for ixpdimm_sw has left.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
Rutvij Karkhanis rutvij.g.karkhanis@intel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rutvij.g.karkhanis@intel.co | |m Blocks|1270993 |1478977 Depends On|1478977 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478977 [Bug 1478977] The maintainer for ixpdimm_sw has left.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com -
Red Hat Bugzilla