https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
Bug ID: 2368700 Summary: Review Request: gocryptfs - Encrypted overlay filesystem written in Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: daron439@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://solopasha.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gocryptfs/gocryptfs.spec SRPM URL: https://solopasha.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gocryptfs/gocryptfs-2.5.4-1.fc43....
Description: Encrypted overlay filesystem written in Go.
Fedora Account System Username: solopasha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |AutomationTriaged
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9087636 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
--- Comment #2 from Pavel Solovev daron439@gmail.com --- Spec URL: https://solopasha.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gocryptfs/gocryptfs.spec SRPM URL: https://solopasha.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gocryptfs/gocryptfs-2.5.4-1.fc43....
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Created attachment 2091695 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2091695&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 9087636 to 9092130
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9092130 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga mikel@olasagasti.info changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mikel@olasagasti.info Flags| |fedora-review+ Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mikel@olasagasti.info
--- Comment #5 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga mikel@olasagasti.info --- Golang Package Review ==============
This package was generated using go2rpm, which simplifies the review.
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
- [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified. - [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers. - [x] The package builds successfully in mock. - [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review). - [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors. - [x] The package runs tests in %check. - [x] `%goipath` is set correctly. - [x] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic names) - [x] There are no `%{_bindir}/*` wildcards in %files. (go2rpm includes these by default) - [x] The package does not use `%gometa -f` if it has dependents that still build for %ix86. - [x] The package complies with the Golang and general Packaging Guidelines.
Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:
- [ ] Add the package to release-monitoring.org - [ ] Give go-sig privileges (at least commit) on the package - [ ] Close the review bug by referencing its ID in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket.
Thanks!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Solovev daron439@gmail.com --- Thank you for the review, Mikel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gocryptfs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2025-d57986e38c (gocryptfs-2.5.4-1.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-d57986e38c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
Pavel Solovev daron439@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |gocryptfs-2.5.4-1.fc43
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Last Closed| |2025-05-27 14:26:01
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2025-d57986e38c (gocryptfs-2.5.4-1.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368700
Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam@redhat.com
--- Comment #10 from Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com --- There was already a review ticket for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241620 . Please be careful to check for existing reviews in future before proceeding with a new one.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org