[Bug 876409] New: Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
9:06 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Bug ID: 876409
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Summary: Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation
of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Linux
Reporter: miro(a)hroncok.cz
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: All
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
Spec URL: https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/raw/master/perl-Growl-GNTP.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-1.fc17.sr...
Description: Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Fedora Account System Username: churchyard
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:06 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:53 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mi(a)v3.sk
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mi(a)v3.sk
Flags| |fedora-review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:54 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.co
| |m
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:17 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> ---
Picking this one, since it looks like we are working on/packaging same thing.
* spec file clean, in american english
* license ok
* source matches upstream, clean without binaries
* rpmlint silent, package builds
- many BR are redundant and useless, while most of them is pulled in by perl or
automatically generated by rpmbuild. list only what you really need to build
(in mock).
- is there anything to filter out with this?
%{?perl_default_filter} # Filters (not)shared c libs
- use dos2unix BR rather than this:
sed -i "s/\r//" README
- specfile is not consistent with provided srpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:23 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> ---
many BR are redundant and useless, while most of them is pulled in by
perl or automatically generated by rpmbuild. list only what you really need to build (in
mock).
I've noticed Requires are autogenerated, but how this works with BR? I supposed
the autogeneration is done during the build procces, while chcecking if BRs are
present is done before the build.
May I simply remove BRs provided by the perl package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:38 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> ---
Blah, you are right (should have corrected myself after correcting myself).
Requires are only auto generated for install, not for build. Anyway, don't pull
pull in explicitly packages provided by perl itself. cpanspec usually generates
sane BR list. Test with minimum, in mock, if it builds and tests are run.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:46 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:28 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> ---
Spec URL: https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/raw/master/perl-Growl-GNTP.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-2.fc17.sr...
- Removed BRs provided by perl package
- Removed useless perl autofilter
- Using dos2unix
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:08 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #5 from Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> ---
Still, you don't need to require each module used at runtime, just to build a
package.
I was able to build this package with as minimum as this:
BuildRequires: perl(Crypt::CBC) >= 2.29
BuildRequires: perl(Data::UUID) >= 0.149
BuildRequires: perl(Digest::MD5) >= 2.36
BuildRequires: perl(Digest::SHA) >= 5.45
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MM_Unix)
Another thing is, there are bundled modules of Module::Install in 'inc/' added
by author via Module::Install. You should remove this and use Module::Install
from fedora.
In this phase, there will be missing Module::Install::AuthorTests (not in
repositories) and probably others (that are not listed above). Or you can
disable author_tests in Makefile.PL. This tests are not run anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:19 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> ---
I was told I need all modules in BR, so tests can run. How it works?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:35 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #7 from Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> ---
The only test that will run, in this case, is t/00 (simple inclusion). t/01
will fail softly, as there is no growl backend to send to. xt are not run,
because you are not "author".
Build in mock, look into build output in build.log.
So remove 'inc' directory, and see, where that will lead; what packages you
will (really) need. I would consider it optional, whether you want to run
author_tests or not. As of f18 there is perl(Module::Install::AuthorTests),
#809931.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:20 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> ---
Spec URL: https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/raw/master/perl-Growl-GNTP.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-3.fc17.sr...
- Removed local inc and xs directories
- Patched source so it doesn't need them
- Removed lots of BR (builds in mock)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:31 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> ---
It's perl(Module::Install), not perl(inc::Module::Install) (provided by the
same package).
Otherwise OK.
APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:56 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #10 from Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> ---
It seems to be inc::Module::Install. If I use Module::Install it yells.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:11 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #11 from Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> ---
(In reply to comment #10)
It seems to be inc::Module::Install. If I use Module::Install it
yells.
Use it as BR, not in Makefile.PL. That one should use inc::Module::Install, so
it can override system module from 'inc/' directory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:53 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> ---
Spec URL: https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/raw/master/perl-Growl-GNTP.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-
4.fc17.src.rpm
- perl(inc::Module::Install) to perl(Module::Install)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:59 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> ---
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Growl-GNTP
Short Description: Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Owners: churchyard ksyz
Branches: f17 f18
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:42 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:48 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #15 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #9)
It's perl(Module::Install), not perl(inc::Module::Install)
(provided by the
same package).
Otherwise OK.
APPROVED
@Michal, perhaps you should read the review guidelines once again:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
A review shouldn't be picking this and that from the spec file and having a
look around... We need a Mock or Koji build, the rpmlint output for all
packages (srpm, rpm, debug packages if any), comparing the original and
packaged sources and so on. Should you actually know as a sponsored packager.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:14 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lkundrak(a)v3.sk
--- Comment #16 from Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> ---
(In reply to comment #15)
@Michal, perhaps you should read the review guidelines once again:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
A review shouldn't be picking this and that from the spec file and having a
look around... We need a Mock or Koji build, the rpmlint output for all
packages (srpm, rpm, debug packages if any), comparing the original and
packaged sources and so on. Should you actually know as a sponsored packager.
@mario, it's hard to reply to your rant, when it looks like, you didn't even
read the review. That guideline, you cited, can you, probably, provide a
source? Or a reason, why you think a reviewer should not look around in the
package, and pick parts from spec file? "If it builds, ship it" is not a good
policy.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:27 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #17 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #16)
"If it builds, ship it" is not a good policy.
That's not what I said. Of course rpmlint doesn't find all problems, but this
is no reason to omit it. Have a look at some of my reviews to see what I mean
[1]. The rpmlint output and a complete checklist is always present, and if
there are some other issues, I report them, as far as I've found them. By the
way, I'm even not convinced about fedora-review. Well, it seems to make the
reviewers' job easier, but it tempts to _not_ looking around the files and
assume to that all is already done by this tool. That's why I don't use it.
I've had such reviews for my own packages, with lots of impressive output and
even a lot of useless stuff. But the actual problems haven't been found, so
that I had to do more work after pushing it to testing. Just for clarifying
that I don't prefer semi-automatic workflow.
However, the package has been approved, the Git repo created, and it is on the
way to the users. I know, most issues in packages come up after the review. But
if we would consider this as a thing which happens anyway, we could stop
reviewing packages in general.
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?resolution=CURRENTRELEASE&res...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:57 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #18 from Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> ---
(In reply to comment #17)
However, the package has been approved, the Git repo created, and it
is on
the way to the users. I know, most issues in packages come up after the
review. But if we would consider this as a thing which happens anyway, we
could stop reviewing packages in general.
I've stopped working on this, the
repo was created, however, I wait for this
discusion to end somehow, before I continue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:50 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #19 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #18)
I've stopped working on this, the repo was created, however, I
wait for this
discusion to end somehow, before I continue.
Go ahead as usual. Don't misunderstand me, I don't want to roll back anything.
The repo has been created, and you should build your packages now. The only
thing which I would show is that I don't recognize this as the right way to
review packages. We have the review guidelines, and we should follow them. This
is not about the quality of your package, it was just about the quality of the
review. Of course, we can change everything once the packages have been built
and some bugs come up. But we could perhaps avoid this by doing reviews
according to the guidelines.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:01 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #20 from Michal Ingeli <mi(a)v3.sk> ---
(In reply to comment #18)
I've stopped working on this, the repo was created, however, I
wait for this
discusion to end somehow, before I continue.
Until Mario (or anyone else) raises any objection or blocker, you are free to
continue and submit builds.
(In reply to comment #19)
The only thing which I would show is that I don't recognize this
as the
right way to review packages. We have the review guidelines, and we should
follow them. This is not about the quality of your package, it was just
about the quality of the review. Of course, we can change everything once
the packages have been built and some bugs come up. But we could perhaps
avoid this by doing reviews according to the guidelines.
There is no guideline, that requires use of fedora-review(1). As sponsor, you
should know that. If you found that any of (and even 'SHOULD') guidelines were
violated, please, state it here, so we can fix it. While doing review-review,
if there are any parts of review, that are not clear to you, I will happily
explain them.
Community projects are about cooperation and communication, not only
guidelines, even if there is no guideline for that. If this should go more OT,
please contact me (cc my sponsor) via mail.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:36 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #21 from Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> ---
Hi,
I have some troubles with fedora-scm.
I've run fedpkg import xxx.src.rpm
I've commited the changes and pushed.
Now if I want to run fedpkg build or fedpkg switch-branch f18, I get this
error:
Could not execute switch_branch/update:
/home/churchyard/rpmbuild/fedora-scm/perl-Growl-GNTP has uncommitted changes.
Use git status too see details
$ git status
# On branch master
# Changes to be committed:
# (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
#
# modified: .gitignore
# new file: perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-3.inc-and-xt-dereference.patch
# new file: perl-Growl-GNTP.spec
# modified: sources
#
$ git commit -am "Some message"
$ git status
# On branch master
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 1 commit.
#
# Changes to be committed:
# (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
#
# modified: .gitignore
# new file: perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-3.inc-and-xt-dereference.patch
# new file: perl-Growl-GNTP.spec
# modified: sources
#
How is this possible?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:18 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #22 from Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> ---
Never mind, I deleted the folder and cloned it again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:16 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:16 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-4.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:17 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-4.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:30 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:30 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:36 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed| |2012-11-29 01:36:44
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:36 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:30 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
perl-Growl-GNTP-0.15-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C5XwAwdFrQ&a=cc_unsubscribe
9:19 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Miro Hrončok <miro(a)hroncok.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |890839
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ixPkgLFJ59&a=cc_unsubscribe
3:57 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
Petr Šabata <psabata(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |psabata(a)redhat.com
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #28 from Petr Šabata <psabata(a)redhat.com> ---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-Growl-GNTP
Branches: f17 f18
Owners:
InitialCC: perl-sig
Please add perl-sig user with watch* permissions only to all Fedora branches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=07CGjQ1YgR&a=cc_unsubscribe
8:35 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 876409] Review Request: perl-Growl-GNTP - Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> ---
Done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ClJ0S2ryw9&a=cc_unsubscribe
4156
days inactive
4205
days old
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
37 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla