https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197066
--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata <psabata(a)redhat.com> ---
--- a/perl-Test-Run.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-Run.spec
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ Version: 0.0302
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Extensible and object-oriented test harness for TAP scripts
# lib and other code: MIT
-# lib/Test/Run/Core_GplArt.pm: GPL+ or Artistic
-# t/lib: GPL+ or Artistic
-License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and MIT
+# lib/Test/Run/Core_GplArt.pm: GPLv2+ or Artistic
+# t/lib/Test (not installed): GPL+ or Artistic
+License: (GPLv2+ or Artistic) and MIT
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Run/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SH/SHLOMIF/Test-Run-%{version}.tar.gz
Well, the license of lib/Test/Run/Core_GplArt.pm is still `GPL+ or Artistic'.
It's just lib/Test/Run/Straps_GplArt.pm that uses `GPLv2+ or Artistic'. The
incorrect spec comment aside, even though this is acceptable, you're
effectively relicensing the package now.
I think the correct tag should be `(GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic)
and MIT'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component