https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184588
Felix Wang <topazus(a)outlook.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |topazus(a)outlook.com
--- Comment #19 from Felix Wang <topazus(a)outlook.com> ---
I see that no assignee at the moment. I take this. You corrected the things
that Miro Hrončok said, most of the package seems good to me. As for license
issue, I read the documentation again, it said
If the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own
file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be
included in %license.
Since it says 'must be included in %license', so you are right. The additional
packaging of license file using %license will be all right, although
%pyproject_save_files macro includes the license file. Apologized for my
previous misunderstanding,which may give inconvenience to you.
But I note that some python-related packages does not use %license (put license
under /usr/share/licenses), like python3-pytest, python3-virtualenv.
ref:
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/pytest/python3-pytest/fedora-rawh...
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/python-virtualenv/python3-virtual...
Finally, I approved the package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184588