Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve@silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-Install/perl-Module-Install.... SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-Install-0.62-1.src.rpm Description: Module::Install is a package for writing installers for CPAN (or CPAN-like) distributions that are clean, simple, minimalist, act in a strictly correct manner with both the ExtUtils::MakeMaker and Module::Build build systems, and will run on any Perl installation version 5.004 or newer.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
steve@silug.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190935
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
steve@silug.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190705 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
jpo@di.uminho.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|190935 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
jpo@di.uminho.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190582
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info |tibbs@math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2006-05-07 18:17 EST ------- The source URL seems to be wrong; is upstream really on your site? CPAN says http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AD/ADAMK/Module-Install-0.62.tar.gz, which I'll take as upstream for the purposes fo this review.
One of the tests spits out some warnings because various utilities are missing; is it worth adding additional BR:s to get more coverage?
Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 92eda243d936f4010883825aa2dd2993 Module-Install-0.62.tar.gz 92eda243d936f4010883825aa2dd2993 Module-Install-0.62.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane (many manual Requires: not picked by rpmlint). * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=51, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.58 cusr + 0.26 csys = 0.84 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app.
APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
------- Additional Comments From steve@silug.org 2006-05-08 11:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1)
The source URL seems to be wrong; is upstream really on your site? CPAN says http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AD/ADAMK/Module-Install-0.62.tar.gz, which I'll take as upstream for the purposes fo this review.
Oops, apparently I forgot to unset CPAN before running cpanspec. Sorry.
One of the tests spits out some warnings because various utilities are missing; is it worth adding additional BR:s to get more coverage?
Definitely. Did you happen to save a build log? (It would save me another mock build.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
------- Additional Comments From steve@silug.org 2006-05-08 13:26 EST ------- OK, I see the warnings now:
t/03_audotinstall....ok 1/6Warning: links not found in PATH Warning: wget not found in PATH Warning: ncftpget not found in PATH Warning: ncftp not found in PATH Warning: ftp not found in PATH Warning: gpg not found in PATH t/03_audotinstall....ok
I wonder if it might be safer to leave those BRs out so it can't do any network tests.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2006-05-08 13:58 EST ------- We certainly don't want it doing network access; I saw the gpg warning and wondered if it was going to test something relating to signing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
------- Additional Comments From jpo@di.uminho.pt 2006-05-08 14:15 EST ------- I believed the warnings are harmless and are being emitted by the CPAN module that this module loads. It must be complaining about the missing configuration.
The gpg, ftp, ncftp*, wget are CPAN configuration variables.
See the output of $ perl -MCPAN -e shell cpan> o conf or the contents of a CPAN configuration file eg: /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/CPAN/Config.pm
jpo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
Bug 190937 depends on bug 190582, which changed state.
Bug 190582 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
steve@silug.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From steve@silug.org 2006-05-09 12:52 EST ------- I'll ignore the warnings then.
The package has been imported into CVS, branches have been created, and builds have been requested.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bochecha@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #7 from Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-19 04:15:06 EST --- This package is in EPEL5, but not in EPEL6. Is there any reason for that?
I would like to see this package in EPEL6, and I am willing to help co-maintain it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190937
--- Comment #8 from Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-19 04:41:13 EST --- Nevermind, I just saw it's in the RHEL6 Client repository (I was only looking at the Server one).
Sorry for the spam.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org