[Bug 1548798] New: Review Request: natural-earth-map-data - Free vector and raster map data at 1:10m, 1:50m, and 1:110m scales
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
Bug ID: 1548798 Summary: Review Request: natural-earth-map-data - Free vector and raster map data at 1:10m, 1:50m, and 1:110m scales Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.analyst@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//natural-earth-map-data.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//natural-earth-map-data-4.0.0-1.fc27.src.rp...
Description: Natural Earth is a public domain map dataset available at 1:10m, 1:50m, and 1:110 million scales. Featuring tightly integrated vector and raster data, with Natural Earth you can make a variety of visually pleasing, well-crafted maps with cartography or GIS software.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25296534
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1548797
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548797 [Bug 1548797] Review Request: python-cartopy - Cartographic Python library with Matplotlib visualisations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com --- Upstream provides .zip files, but I wonder if I should repackage as tar.xz; this would save about 105M. I did ask upstream about it [1], but haven't gotten a response yet.
[1] https://github.com/nvkelso/natural-earth-vector/issues/248
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST CC| |zebob.m@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |zebob.m@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin zebob.m@gmail.com --- Package approved.
You should grab https://github.com/nvkelso/natural-earth-vector/blob/master/LICENSE.md and add it as a %license file.
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* CC0 (v9)", "CC0", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Public domain". 1198 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/natural-earth- map-data/review-natural-earth-map-data/licensecheck.txt [-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 583680 bytes in 18 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in natural- earth-map-data-110m , natural-earth-map-data-50m , natural-earth-map- data-10m [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: natural-earth-map-data-110m-4.0.0-1.fc29.noarch.rpm natural-earth-map-data-50m-4.0.0-1.fc29.noarch.rpm natural-earth-map-data-10m-4.0.0-1.fc29.noarch.rpm natural-earth-map-data-4.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm natural-earth-map-data-110m.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dataset -> data set, data-set, database natural-earth-map-data-50m.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dataset -> data set, data-set, database natural-earth-map-data-10m.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dataset -> data set, data-set, database natural-earth-map-data.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dataset -> data set, data-set, database natural-earth-map-data.src: W: no-%build-section 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/natural-earth-map-data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- natural-earth-map-data-4.0.0-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5113a4dec7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- natural-earth-map-data-4.0.0-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-82436ae18b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- natural-earth-map-data-4.0.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5113a4dec7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- natural-earth-map-data-4.0.0-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-82436ae18b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2018-03-06 12:25:19
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- natural-earth-map-data-4.0.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548798
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- natural-earth-map-data-4.0.0-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com