https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
Bug ID: 855666 QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: perl-Queue-DBI - A queueing module with an emphasis on safety, using DBI as a storage system Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: emmanuel@seyman.fr Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora
Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI-2.1.0... Description: Queue-DBI allows you to safely use a queueing system by preventing backtracking, infinite loops and data loss. An emphasis of this distribution is to provide an extremely reliable dequeueing mechanism without having to use transactions.
Fedora Account System Username: eseyman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel@seyman.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |855665
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel@seyman.fr --- I've updated the package.
Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI-2.2.1...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario.blaettermann@gmail.co | |m
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- # Not present in Fedora (#859894) # BuildRequires: perl(Test::Dist::VersionSync)
The missing build dependency is now available, at least in Rawhide. You should update your spec.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
--- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel@seyman.fr --- (In reply to comment #2)
The missing build dependency is now available, at least in Rawhide. You should update your spec.
I had done so but forgot to upload the results to the webserver. :-| I've done so after having updated the package version to the latest and greatest.
Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.0...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
--- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel@seyman.fr --- I've updated the package again.
Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bochecha@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |bochecha@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org --- One comment first: what's the point of the ignore.txt file? It looks like something used by this module:
http://search.cpan.org/~xsawyerx/Module-Starter-1.58/lib/Module/Starter/Simp...
If that's what it is, it doesn't seem useful to have it as %doc.
Now on to the actual review...
Summary of issues =================
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
=> There is a LICENSE file, include it as %doc
Package Review ==============
Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [-]: Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s) [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: CheckResultdir [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
Perl: [x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Reguires:.
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. Note: Source0 (Queue-DBI-2.4.2.tar.gz) => This is normal for Perl, ignore [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2-1.fc18.src.rpm perl-Queue-DBI.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) queueing -> queuing, queening, queering perl-Queue-DBI.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US queueing -> queuing, queening, queering perl-Queue-DBI.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dequeueing -> queuing perl-Queue-DBI.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) queueing -> queuing, queening, queering perl-Queue-DBI.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US queueing -> queuing, queening, queering perl-Queue-DBI.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dequeueing -> queuing 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint perl-Queue-DBI perl-Queue-DBI.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) queueing -> queuing, queening, queering perl-Queue-DBI.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US queueing -> queuing, queening, queering perl-Queue-DBI.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dequeueing -> queuing 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires -------- perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.1) perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Data::Validate::Type) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(Queue::DBI) perl(Queue::DBI::Element) perl(Storable) perl(Try::Tiny) perl(strict) perl(warnings)
Provides -------- perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm:
perl(Queue::DBI) = 2.4.2 perl(Queue::DBI::Admin) = 2.4.2 perl(Queue::DBI::Element) = 2.4.2 perl-Queue-DBI = 2.4.2-1.fc18
MD5-sum check ------------- http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/A/AU/AUBERTG/Queue-DBI-2.4.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 5e7d3bce33ff662cf680382be5776197fc0fffff4cc12136f9b50d8206d33eb8 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 5e7d3bce33ff662cf680382be5776197fc0fffff4cc12136f9b50d8206d33eb8
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.0 (c78e275) last change: 2012-09-24 Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 855666 -m fedora-18-x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
--- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel@seyman.fr --- (In reply to comment #5)
If that's what it is, it doesn't seem useful to have it as %doc.
True. Removed.
=> There is a LICENSE file, include it as %doc
Done.
Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Queue-DBI/perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org --- Only difference between this new package and the previous submission is:
----------- @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-Queue-DBI Version: 2.4.2 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: A queueing module with an emphasis on safety, using DBI as a storage system License: GPLv3 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Queue-DBI/ @@ -42,11 +42,14 @@ ./Build test
%files -%doc Changes ignore.txt README +%doc Changes LICENSE README %{perl_vendorlib}/* %{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog +* Thu Oct 25 2012 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel@seyman.fr - 2.4.2-2 +- Add LICENSE and remove ignore.txt in doc macro, per review (#855666) + * Sun Oct 21 2012 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel@seyman.fr - 2.4.2-1 - Update to 2.4.2 -----------
This fixes the only issue I had, so the package is approved.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel@seyman.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel@seyman.fr --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Queue-DBI Short Description: A queueing module with an emphasis on safety, using DBI as a storage system Owners: eseyman Branches: F18 F17 InitialCC: perl-sig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2-2.fc17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2-2.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Queue-DBI-2.4.2-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855666
Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2012-11-15 05:27:40
--- Comment #13 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaettermann@gmail.com --- Packages for all requested branches are marked as stable now.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org