[Bug 894727] New: Review Request: nodejs-yamlish - Parser/encoder for the yamlish format
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
Bug ID: 894727 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-yamlish - Parser/encoder for the yamlish format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: tchollingsworth@gmail.com
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-yamlish.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc17.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4864578 FAS username: patches
This is a module to parse the "yamlish" format used to serialize objects in the TAP format.
It's like yaml, but just a tiny little bit smaller.
This package is part of the tap stack used to test many Node.js modules.
Please use nodejs-0.6.5-9 or later when building or using this package.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |894724
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
Michael Scherer misc@zarb.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |misc@zarb.org Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |misc@zarb.org Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer misc@zarb.org --- package is approved, there is no blocker.
Package Review ==============
Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
Issues: ======= - Should ask to the upstream to ship the LICENSE ( as usual ) - tests :) - EL5-ims
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [!]: Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot: present but not needed [!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: %clean present but not required [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc19.noarch.rpm nodejs-yamlish.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yaml -> yam, yams, yawl nodejs-yamlish.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint nodejs-yamlish nodejs-yamlish.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yaml -> yam, yams, yawl nodejs-yamlish.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires -------- nodejs-yamlish (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): nodejs(engine)
Provides -------- nodejs-yamlish: nodejs-yamlish npm(yamlish)
MD5-sum check ------------- http://registry.npmjs.org/yamlish/-/yamlish-0.0.5.tgz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 3a040413738ab13894f2e2bf2b67092e812b2a13c57e6c540dd801a93a1794e0 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 3a040413738ab13894f2e2bf2b67092e812b2a13c57e6c540dd801a93a1794e0
Generated by fedora-review 0.2.0 (Unknown) last change: Unknown Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :./try-fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 894727
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: nodejs-yamlish Short Description: Parser/encoder for the yamlish format Owners: patches Branches: f18 el6 InitialCC:
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2013-01-17 02:43:42
--- Comment #4 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com --- Built for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4876480
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-abbrev-1.0.4-2.fc18, nodejs-ansi-0.1.2-4.fc18, nodejs-async-0.1.22-3.fc18, nodejs-glob-3.1.14-2.fc18, nodejs-inherits-1.0.0-6.fc18, nodejs-graceful-fs-1.1.14-2.fc18, nodejs-minimatch-0.2.9-2.fc18, nodejs-mkdirp-0.3.4-2.fc18, nodejs-mute-stream-0.0.3-3.fc18, nodejs-read-1.0.4-4.fc18, nodejs-read-installed-0.0.4-2.fc18, nodejs-read-package-json-0.1.12-2.fc18, nodejs-retry-0.6.0-2.fc18, nodejs-rimraf-2.1.1-2.fc18, nodejs-slide-1.1.3-4.fc18, nodejs-uid-number-0.0.3-4.fc18, nodejs-sigmund-1.0.0-2.fc18, nodejs-osenv-0.0.3-2.fc18, nodejs-nopt-2.0.0-3.fc18, nodejs-lru-cache-2.2.1-2.fc18, nodejs-mime-1.2.7-2.fc18, nodejs-init-package-json-0.0.7-3.fc18, nodejs-fstream-0.1.21-3.fc18, nodejs-delayed-stream-0.0.5-2.fc18, nodejs-proto-list-1.2.2-2.fc18, nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.11-2.fc18, nodejs-form-data-0.0.6-2.fc18, nodejs-which-1.0.5-4.fc18, nodejs-chownr-0.0.1-6.fc18, nodejs-opts-1.2.2-2.fc18, nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-once-1.1.1-2.fc18, nodejs-lockfile-0.2.1-2.fc18, nodejs-ini-1.0.5-2.fc18, nodejs-couch-login-0.1.15-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0775/nodejs-abbrev-1.0.4... 8,nodejs-lockfile-0.2.1-2.fc18,nodejs-ini-1.0.5-2.fc18,nodejs-couch-login-0.1.15-2.fc18
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-amdefine-0.0.4-1.fc18,nodejs-buffer-equal-0.0.0-1.fc18,nodejs-charm-0.1.0-1.fc18,nodejs-deep-equal-0.0.0-2.fc18,nodejs-optimist-0.3.5-1.fc18,nodejs-source-map-0.1.8-3.fc18,nodejs-traverse-0.6.3-2.fc18,nodejs-wordwrap-0.0.2-2.fc18,nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc18,uglify-js-2.2.4-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-amdefine-0.0.4-1.fc18,nodejs-...
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894727
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-amdefine-0.0.4-1.fc18, nodejs-buffer-equal-0.0.0-1.fc18, nodejs-charm-0.1.0-1.fc18, nodejs-deep-equal-0.0.0-2.fc18, nodejs-optimist-0.3.5-1.fc18, nodejs-source-map-0.1.8-3.fc18, nodejs-traverse-0.6.3-2.fc18, nodejs-wordwrap-0.0.2-2.fc18, nodejs-yamlish-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-2.fc18, uglify-js1-1.3.4-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla