Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rkhadgar@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk-0.18-2.svn20060131... Description: This is a binding of GTK+ for the librep Lisp interpreter. It is based on Marius Vollmer's guile-gtk package (initially version 0.15, updated to 0.17), with a new glue-code generator.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
rkhadgar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |431249 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
------- Additional Comments From michal@harddata.com 2008-02-03 17:28 EST ------- Similar size considerations apply in this case as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250#c5 Additionally there is also ChangeLog~ which happens to be identical to ChangeLog.
After unpacking src.rpm package 'file rep-gtk-0.18.svn20060131.tar.gz' prints: ".... bzip2 compressed data, block size = 900k". Ahem ...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar@redhat.com 2008-02-27 10:06 EST ------- Updated packages based on review.
http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk-0.18-3.20060131svn...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
akahl@iconmobile.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |431250
------- Additional Comments From akahl@iconmobile.com 2008-03-23 08:57 EST ------- Since this package depends on librep also being under review, I've added the latter to the dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar@redhat.com 2008-04-10 02:27 EST ------- thanks Alexander.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar@ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |rep-gtk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
--- Comment #5 from ritz rkhadgar@redhat.com 2008-10-03 18:00:23 EDT --- updated package
http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk-0.18.1-1.20081003s... http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
Michal Jaegermann michal@harddata.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michal@harddata.com
--- Comment #6 from Michal Jaegermann michal@harddata.com 2008-10-27 22:48:28 EDT --- As announced ("Fixed in rev386") in http://mail.gnome.org/archives/sawfish-list/2008-October/msg00032.html that source version fixes broken GtkCombos and that makes possible to pick up different themes again through sawfish-ui. The package from comment #5 is affected by this bug and replacing rep-gtk indeed fixes it.
Also the corresponding spec relies in %file section on %{_host} to come as %{_arch}-redhat-linux-gnu. On the current rawhide it shows up as %{arch}-unknown-linux-gnu instead and the spec breaks.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
Bug 431251 depends on bug 431250, which changed state.
Bug 431250 Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-03-09 20:08:53 EDT --- Since a dependency submitted by the same person has been closed for non-response, I'm closing this as well.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2011-03-31 15:33:40 EDT ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 692541 ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org