[Bug 1103457] New: Review Request: liquid-dsp - Software-Defined Radio Digital Signal Processing Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103457
Bug ID: 1103457 Summary: Review Request: liquid-dsp - Software-Defined Radio Digital Signal Processing Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: floriantani@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://openlabs.cc/linux/fedora/liquid-dsp/liquid-dsp.spec SRPM URL: http://openlabs.cc/linux/fedora/liquid-dsp/liquid-dsp-1.2.0-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: liquid-dsp is a free and open-source digital signal processing (DSP)library designed specifically for software-defined radios on embedded platforms. The aim is to provide a lightweight DSP library that does not rely on a myriad of external dependencies or proprietary and otherwise cumbersome frameworks. All signal processing elements are designed to be flexible, scalable, and dynamic, including filters, filter design,oscillators, modems, synchronizers, and complex mathematical operations.
Fedora Account System Username: ftani
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103457
Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net --- FAS says:
| Error! | | The following error(s) have occurred with your request: | | username: 'ftani' does not exist.
It seems you meant: floriantani
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103457
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt bugs.michael@gmx.net --- Btw, same here as with your other review request (bug 1092431):
| | %files | %doc COPYING HISTORY README.md TROUBLESHOOTING |
The built package does not include anything other than these %doc files. That's not the only mistake in this spec file, but it tells that you haven't tested your packages at all. :-(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103457
Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchy@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com --- Florian, please update and test you spec and srpm before applying. Here are some pointers: https://fedorahosted.org/copr/wiki/UserDocs#HowcanIpackagesoftwareasRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103457
Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Last Closed| |2016-07-29 09:20:00
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com --- No response so far. Closing. Please reopen if you want to continue.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla