Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: gyp - Generate Your Projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
Summary: Review Request: gyp - Generate Your Projects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gyp/gyp.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gyp/gyp-0.1-0.1.839svn.fc12.src.rpm Description: GYP is a tool to generates native Visual Studio, Xcode and SCons and/or make build files from a platform-independent input format.
Its syntax is a universal cross-platform build representation that still allows sufficient per-platform flexibility to accommodate irreconcilable differences.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |619395 AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-04 14:34:36 EDT --- Some notes:
! Unneeded macros - You can remove %python_sitearch definition because it is uses nowhere.
* Release -------------------------------------------------------- Release: 0.1.%{?revision:%{revision}svn}%{?dist} -------------------------------------------------------- - Well, I guess you meant "0.1%{?revision:.%{revision}svn}%{?dist}"
* BuildRoot - BuildRoot tag is no longer needed on Fedora and EPEL6: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
* BR for python - Please specify python2 or python3. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#BuildRequires
- Build fails on F-12 without BR: python2-devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2379955
* %{__python} setup.py install - Maybe there is only small difference, however I guess we usually add "--skip-build" to "python setup.py install".
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-08-04 23:00:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
Some notes:
! Unneeded macros
- You can remove %python_sitearch definition because it is uses nowhere.
It was necessary to build on f12: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros
- Release
Release: 0.1.%{?revision:%{revision}svn}%{?dist}
- Well, I guess you meant "0.1%{?revision:.%{revision}svn}%{?dist}"
You're right. fixed.
- BuildRoot
- BuildRoot tag is no longer needed on Fedora and EPEL6: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
fixed.
BR for python
Please specify python2 or python3. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#BuildRequires
Build fails on F-12 without BR: python2-devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2379955
Okay, fixed.
- %{__python} setup.py install
- Maybe there is only small difference, however I guess we usually add "--skip-build" to "python setup.py install".
Sure. updated with: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gyp/gyp.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gyp/gyp-0.1-0.2.839svn.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-08-05 03:44:22 EDT --- Okay.
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
Some notes:
! Unneeded macros
- You can remove %python_sitearch definition because it is uses nowhere.
It was necessary to build on f12: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros
- Well, what I meant here is while %python_sitelib definition is needed for F=12, %python_sitearch definition is unneeded (because this is noarch), however not a blocker.
--------------------------------------------------------------- This package (gyp) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-08-05 04:17:53 EDT --- Ah, yep. just copy and paste that there. anyway, thank you for the review.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: gyp Short Description: Generate Your Projects Owners: tagoh Branches: f12 f13 f14 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-08-05 13:12:04 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-08-06 03:08:13 EDT --- Thanks. the packages has been built.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2011-08-23 23:35:46 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gyp New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: tagoh InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621242
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-08-24 05:58:59 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org