Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: sahana - Disaster Management System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
Summary: Review Request: sahana - Disaster Management System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david@gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/sahana.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/sahana-0.6.2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Sahana is a Free and Open Source Disaster Management system. It is a web based collaboration tool that addresses the common coordination problems during a disaster from finding missing people, managing aid, managing volunteers, tracking camps effectively between Government groups, the civil society (NGOs) and the victims themselves.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
--- Comment #1 from David Nalley david@gnsa.us 2009-03-22 22:30:22 EDT --- [ke4qqq@nalley SPECS]$ rpmlint ./sahana.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq@nalley SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/sahana-0.6.2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq@nalley SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/sahana-0.6.2.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sahana.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/sahana/conf-order.inc apache sahana.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/sahana apache sahana.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/sahana 0664 sahana.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/sahana/sysconf.inc.tpl apache 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings.
The non-standard gid and perms are due to the need for the installer to be able to write to the conf files.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mmaslano@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com 2009-03-27 10:35:12 EDT --- It would be nice if you put %post part between %files and %clean section.
Rpm shouldn't have any output. This must be fixed for review: rpm -i /home/marca/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/sahana-0.6.2.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm messy: /usr/share/sahana/conf -> ../../../etc/sahana/ changed: /usr/share/sahana/conf -> ../../../etc/sahana
OK Rpmlint must be run on every package. OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file. OK The spec file must be written in American English. OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK The package MUST successfully compile. OK Correct BuildRequires. OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review. OK A package must own all directories that it creates. OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK Permissions on files must be set properly. OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK Each package must consistently use macros. OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in -devel. OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package. OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
Suggestions: * replace the version 0.6.2.2 with macron %{version}. * it should be used macro %bcond_without selinux and %if %{with selinux} for parts which need selinux. It's good habit to create packages which could be rebuild without selinux.
Thanks for reading ;-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
--- Comment #3 from David Nalley david@gnsa.us 2009-03-29 19:58:53 EDT --- Thanks for the review!
I believe I have fixed all of the things you brought up.
Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/sahana.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/sahana-0.6.2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm
I believed Update here:
[ke4qqq@nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./sahana.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq@nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/sahana-0.6.2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq@nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/sahana-0.6.2.2-2.fc10.noarch.rpm sahana.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/sahana apache sahana.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/sahana apache sahana.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/sahana/conf-order.inc apache sahana.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/sahana apache sahana.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/sahana 0775 sahana.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/sahana/sysconf.inc.tpl apache 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. [ke4qqq@nalleyt61 SPECS]$
The /var/lib/sahana dir needs to be writable by apache as does /etc/sahana/* hence the warnings/error
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
--- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com 2009-03-31 09:27:35 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1267776&name=build.log You are missing dos2unix requirement.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
--- Comment #5 from David Nalley david@gnsa.us 2009-03-31 09:50:50 EDT --- Oops. Thanks for catching that.
Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/sahana.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/sahana-0.6.2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm
Here's the build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1267793&name=build.log
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com 2009-03-31 09:58:59 EDT --- ACCEPTED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
--- Comment #7 from David Nalley david@gnsa.us 2009-03-31 10:16:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sahana Short Description: Disaster Management System Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
David Nalley david@gnsa.us changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us 2009-04-01 12:37:51 EDT --- CVS Done
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-03 17:45:34 EDT --- sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-03 17:45:39 EDT --- sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-06 16:28:54 EDT --- sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.2.2-4.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-06 16:29:09 EDT --- sahana-0.6.2.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6.2.2-4.fc9 |0.6.2.2-4.fc10
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla