https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292943
Bug ID: 2292943 Summary: Review Request: polylabel - A fast algorithm for finding the pole of inaccessibility of a polygon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tom@compton.nu QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://tomh.fedorapeople.org/polylabel.spec SRPM URL: https://tomh.fedorapeople.org/polylabel-1.1.0-1.fc40.src.rpm
Description: A fast algorithm for finding polygon pole of inaccessibility, the most distant internal point from the polygon outline.
Useful for optimal placement of a text label on a polygon.
Fedora Account System Username: tomh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292943
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes tom@compton.nu --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=119249914
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292943
Tom Hughes tom@compton.nu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2275243 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275243 [Bug 2275243] mapnik-4.0.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292943
Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://github.com/mapbox/p | |olylabel/ Keywords| |AutomationTriaged
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7625356 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292943
Tom Rix trix@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |trix@redhat.com CC| |trix@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292943
Tom Rix trix@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Tom Rix trix@redhat.com --- Could update to v2.0.0 - came out this week. Also add %dir %{_includedir}/mapbox to %files devel
Pretty simple header only package. test passes
approved
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292943
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes tom@compton.nu --- Thanks for the review.
I'll update the version but I'm not clear why you think adding %dir would be helpful? The directory is already added along with the files it contained and the only thing %dir does it to make rpm package the directory without any files it contains meaning they would then have to be listed separately, or is that what you're suggesting?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292943
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/polylabel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292943
Tom Hughes tom@compton.nu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2024-07-05 16:01:18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292943
--- Comment #6 from Tom Rix trix@redhat.com --- (In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #4)
Thanks for the review.
I'll update the version but I'm not clear why you think adding %dir would be helpful? The directory is already added along with the files it contained and the only thing %dir does it to make rpm package the directory without any files it contains meaning they would then have to be listed separately, or is that what you're suggesting?
the fedora-review output had some (maybe spurious) warnings about dir ownership. i have used the %dir squash these warnings in my own spec files.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org