https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348419
Bug ID: 2348419 Summary: Review Request: tiny-utf8 - Unicode-capable std::string replacement Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fedora@svgames.pl QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
spec: https://suve.fedorapeople.org/review/tiny-utf8-4.4.3-1/tiny-utf8.spec srpm: https://suve.fedorapeople.org/review/tiny-utf8-4.4.3-1/tiny-utf8-4.4.3-1.fc4... koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=129632503
Description: tiny-utf8 is a single-header library for C++ providing a single class, utf8_string, which acts as a drop-in replacement for std::string.
Fedora Account System Username: suve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348419
Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |AutomationTriaged URL| |https://github.com/DuffsDev | |ice/tiny-utf8
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8702843 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348419
Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags| |fedora-review? CC| |benson_muite@emailplus.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |benson_muite@emailplus.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348419
--- Comment #2 from Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org --- Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++: [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License". 24 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/fedora-packaging/reviews/tiny-utf8/2348419-tiny-utf8/licensecheck.txt [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in tiny- utf8-devel [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: tiny-utf8-devel-4.4.3-1.fc43.noarch.rpm tiny-utf8-doc-4.4.3-1.fc43.noarch.rpm tiny-utf8-4.4.3-1.fc43.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpg0cis64g')] checks: 32, packages: 3
tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/README.md tiny-utf8.src: E: spelling-error ('codepoint', '%description -l en_US codepoint -> code point, code-point, codependent') tiny-utf8-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('codepoint', '%description -l en_US codepoint -> code point, code-point, codependent') tiny-utf8-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/search/functions_e.js /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/search/all_1a.js tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/search/pages_7.js /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/search/all_f.js tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__inherit__graph.map /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__coll__graph.map tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__inherit__graph.md5 /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__coll__graph.md5 tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__inherit__graph.png /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__coll__graph.png tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__inherit__graph.map /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__coll__graph.map tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__inherit__graph.md5 /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__coll__graph.md5 tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__inherit__graph.png /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__coll__graph.png 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 10 warnings, 11 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 0.5 s
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.7.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 2
tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/README.md tiny-utf8-devel.noarch: E: spelling-error ('codepoint', '%description -l en_US codepoint -> code point, code-point, codependent') tiny-utf8-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/search/functions_e.js /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/search/all_1a.js tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/search/pages_7.js /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/search/all_f.js tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__inherit__graph.map /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__coll__graph.map tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__inherit__graph.md5 /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__coll__graph.md5 tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__inherit__graph.png /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__iterator__coll__graph.png tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__inherit__graph.map /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__coll__graph.map tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__inherit__graph.md5 /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__coll__graph.md5 tiny-utf8-doc.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__inherit__graph.png /usr/share/doc/tiny-utf8/html/structtiny__utf8_1_1const__reverse__iterator__coll__graph.png 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings, 7 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.2 s
Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/DuffsDevice/tiny-utf8/archive/v4.4.3/tiny-utf8-4.4.3.tar.... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 8e3f61651909c9f3105d3501932a96aa65733127fb6e7cf94cb1b0a2dff42c8f CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 8e3f61651909c9f3105d3501932a96aa65733127fb6e7cf94cb1b0a2dff42c8f
Requires -------- tiny-utf8-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cmake-filesystem
tiny-utf8-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides -------- tiny-utf8-devel: cmake(tinyutf8) tiny-utf8-devel
tiny-utf8-doc: tiny-utf8-doc
Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2348419 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Haskell, SugarActivity, fonts, PHP, R, Python, Java, Perl, C/C++, Ocaml Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
Comments: a) Please change README file endings, for example using dos2unix b) May need to indicate Provides: tiny-utf8-static see packaging documentation for header only libraries https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines c) Add license file to documentation sub package b) You may want to run the tests on every architecture.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348419
--- Comment #3 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki fedora@svgames.pl ---
b) You may want to run the tests on every architecture.
derp. The tests fail in i686 and s390x. This is probably gonna take some time to debug and fix.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348419
--- Comment #4 from Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org --- Ok. Those architectures can be excluded for now.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348419
Artur Frenszek-Iwicki fedora@svgames.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Last Closed| |2025-08-31 09:05:12
--- Comment #5 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki fedora@svgames.pl --- I no longer need this, plus the project has been archived upstream.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com