[Bug 657948] New: Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher insired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher insired by MacOS Quicksilver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

Summary: Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke
                    launcher insired by MacOS Quicksilver
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora
    Target Release: ---

Spec URL: http://static.zapletalovi.com/fedora/rpm/launchy/2.5-1/launchy.spec
SRPM URL:
http://static.zapletalovi.com/fedora/rpm/launchy/2.5-1/launchy-2.5-1.fc14.sr...

Description: 
Launchy is a free cross-platform utility designed to help you forget about your
start menu, the icons on your desktop, and even your file manager.
Launchy indexes the programs in your start menu and can launch your documents,
project files, folders, and bookmarks with just a few keystrokes!

$ rpmlint launchy-2.5-1.fc14.i686.rpm launchy-debuginfo-2.5-1.fc14.i686.rpm
launchy-devel-2.5-1.fc14.i686.rpm 
launchy.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary launchy
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint launchy-2.5-1.fc14.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

Lukáš Zapletal  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: launchy -   |Review Request: launchy -
                   |open source keystroke       |open source keystroke
                   |launcher insired by MacOS   |launcher inspired by MacOS
                   |Quicksilver                 |Quicksilver

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

--- Comment #1 from Lukáš Zapletal  2010-11-29 06:56:51 EST ---
Correcting XDG icon path issue causing some icons incorrectly loaded:

http://static.zapletalovi.com/fedora/rpm/launchy/2.5-2/

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý  2010-12-13 09:36:31 EST ---
missing buildrequires: gcc-c++
Please try to build in koji as scretch build to find possible missing build
requires.

rpmlint -i /home/mirek/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/launchy-2.5-2.fc14.i686.rpm
launchy.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11
You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded
explicit Requires: tags.

launchy.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary launchy
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page

even without specifying  libX11 you automatically get libX11.so.6 as
requirement.
The same probably apply on qt, rpmbuild will give you:
libQtCore.so.4  
libQtGui.so.4  
libQtNetwork.so.4
so you most probably do not need to require qt and qt-x11, you "just" need
those 3 libraries.

you use there once /usr/share, you may want to replace it with: %{_datadir}

Apart from this it seems ok (for first sight).

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

Lukáš Zapletal  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?([e-mail]
                   |                            |)

--- Comment #3 from Lukáš Zapletal  2011-01-18 11:29:03 EST ---
@Mirek: Thanks. I have corrected libraries and added GCC dep and fixed the
datadir.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2729101

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2729102&name=launchy-2...

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?([e-mail] |
                   |)                           |

--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý  2011-08-09 07:11:56 EDT ---
SRC.RPM:
[13:10] <lzap> http://lzap.fedorapeople.org/fedora-packaging/launchy/2.5-3/

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý  2011-08-09 07:25:34 EDT ---
> Mon Sep 06 2010 Lukas Zapletal  - 2.5-3
> review by msuchy

This is inappropriate. In changelog we write what we done, why you done it
should be written in BZ. I would recommend:
- 657948 - fix requires and buildrequires

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchý  2011-08-09 07:56:30 EDT ---
==============

Key:
 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines 
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
     Tested on: f16/i686, x86_64
 [!] Rpmlint output:
rpmlint /tmp/launchy-*.rpm
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/precompiled.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/common/DropListWidget.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/platforms/unix/platform_unix.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/InputDataList.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/icon_delegate.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/SettingsManager.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/globals.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/common/FileBrowserDelegate.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/common/FileBrowserDelegate.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/FileSearch.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/catalog.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/catalog.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/main.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/plugin_handler.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/catalog_types.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/verby/Verby.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/options.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/CharListWidget.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/calcy/gui.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/platform_base.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/calcy/gui.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/Fader.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/main.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/weby/gui.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/runner/runner.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/InputDataList.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/calcy/calcy.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/gcalc/gcalc.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/catalog_builder.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/CommandHistory.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/runner/gui.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/FileSearch.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/verby/gui.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/runner/precompiled.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/runner/runner.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/platforms/unix/platform_unix.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/AnimationLabel.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/CommandHistory.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/options.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/CharLineEdit.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/SettingsManager.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/common/DropListWidget.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/AnimationLabel.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/icon_extractor.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/CharListWidget.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/platform_base_hotkey.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/plugin_interface.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/CharLineEdit.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/weby/precompiled.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/platforms/unix/platform_x11_hotkey.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/Fader.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/icon_delegate.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/weby/globals.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/platform_base_hotkey.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/catalog_builder.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/verby/Verby.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/runner/globals.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/runner/gui.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/gcalc/precompiled.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/weby/weby.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/calcy/calcy.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/globals.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/catalog_types.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/verby/gui.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/plugin_handler.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/platform_base_hottrigger.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/plugin_interface.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/calcy/precompiled.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/weby/gui.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/icon_extractor.cpp
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/gcalc/gcalc.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/plugins/weby/weby.h
launchy-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/launchy-2.5/src/Directory.h
launchy-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/launchy/plugin_interface.h
launchy-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/launchy/catalog.h
launchy.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/launchy-2.5/LICENSE.txt
launchy.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary launchy
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 76 errors, 2 warnings.
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Note: if you do not intend to package for EPEL5, then Buildroot is not needed
at all.
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     GPL+
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
ca9de9e165d6c327f48aa81dd0ee1a6f  launchy-2.5.tar.gz
ca9de9e165d6c327f48aa81dd0ee1a6f  ../SOURCES/launchy-2.5.tar.gz
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: koji scratch build
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
     Tested on:koji scratch build
 [?] Package functions as described.
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.
 [!] %check is present and the tests pass

All MUST items are resolved. However I strongly suggest you to:
1) Contact upstream and fix FSF address in GPL license
2) write man page of launchy and sent it to upstream. 
If you have problem writing man page or you never done it, I recommend you:
http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/
http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/asciidoc.1.txt
You can look in spec file of "tito" how you can handle it.
3) contact upstream an move /usr/lib64/launchy/plugins/icons/* to
/usr/share/launchy/

These two items are minor and can be fixed during live in Fedora.

================
*** APPROVED ***
================

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

Lukáš Zapletal  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #7 from Lukáš Zapletal  2011-10-06 17:02:41 EDT ---
Thank you, contacted upstream:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3419790&group_id=13...

This program was really difficult to package, very non-standard.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: launchy
Short Description: Free cross-platform utility designed to start apps
Owners: lzap
Branches: f16
InitialCC:

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla  2011-10-07 08:15:18 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

--- Comment #9 from Lukáš Zapletal  2011-10-07 11:51:00 EDT ---
@Jon - I am unable to clone it:

[lzap@lzapx fedpkg]$ fedpkg clone launchy
Cloning into launchy...
R access for launchy DENIED to lzap
(Or there may be no repository at the given path. Did you spell it correctly?)
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
Could not clone: Command '['git', 'clone',
'ssh://[e-mail]/launchy']' returned non-zero exit status 128

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

--- Comment #10 from Miroslav Suchý  2011-11-22 14:58:52 EST ---
Lukas. I do not think rel-eng monitor this bugzilla. If you need their
attention, you have to either reset fedora-cvs to ? or (rather preferable)
contact them dirctly using:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering#Contact_Information
    IRC: #fedora-devel
    Mailing List: [e-mail]
    Issue tracker: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/newticket

[Bug 657948] Review Request: launchy - open source keystroke launcher inspired by MacOS Quicksilver

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657948

--- Comment #11 from Lukáš Zapletal  2011-12-01 08:23:29 EST ---
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4995