[Bug 481428] New: Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

Summary: Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora

Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm

Project URL: http://digitaldump.wordpress.com/projects/rednotebook/

Description:
RedNotebook is a desktop diary that makes it very easy for you
to keep track of the stuff you do and the thoughts you have. This
journal software helps you to write whole passages or just facts,
and does so in style.

Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1079749

rpmlint output:
[fab@laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint rednotebook*
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[fab@laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint rednotebook-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter   2009-01-24 12:49:58 EDT ---
On my machines this application is crashing...

[fab@laptop24 ~]$ rednotebook 
AppDir: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/rednotebook
BaseDir: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages
7955ed6d-4298-8816-362d144d-0b45e79e is dumped

I will get in touch with upstream about this.

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

Fabian Affolter  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    External Bug ID|                            |Ubuntu Launchpad 320492

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter   2009-01-24 12:56:24 EDT ---
It's a known bug -> https://bugs.launchpad.net/rednotebook/+bug/320492

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

Fabian Affolter  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |439667

--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter   2009-02-03 05:08:48 EDT ---
A person reports that it works with the workaround from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439667#c8

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter   2009-02-12 16:25:00 EDT ---
* Thu Feb 12 2009 Fabian Affolter  - 0.5.5-1
- Updated to new upstream version 0.5.5

Updated files

Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook-0.5.5-1.fc10.src.rpm

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter   2009-03-07 07:13:05 EDT ---
* Sat Mar 07 2009 Fabian Affolter  - 0.6.1-1
- Updated to new upstream version 0.6.1
- Renamed docs, added License file

Updated files

Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

manuel wolfshant  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant   2009-03-07 14:25:31 EDT ---
Package Review
==============

Key:
 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
     Tested on: devel/x86_64
 [x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:empty
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     License type: GPLv2+
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
     SHA1SUM of source file: f7517ef745e1f1fc0575c38ed24b95c4c3538904
rednotebook-0.6.1.tar.gz
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}.
 [x] Package consistently uses macros.
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 [x] Final provides and requires are sane.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
 [x] Latest version is packaged.
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: devel/x86_64 + koji scratch build
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
     Tested on: koji scratch build
 [?] Package functions as described.
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
 [-] File based requires are sane.
 [-] %check is present and the test passes.

================
*** APPROVED ***
================

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter   2009-03-07 15:11:29 EDT ---
Manuel, thanks for the review.

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

Fabian Affolter  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter   2009-03-07 15:12:42 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: rednotebook
Short Description: A desktop diary
Owners: fab
Branches: F-9 F-10
InitialCC:

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

Kevin Fenzi  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+

--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi   2009-03-09 12:10:17 EDT ---
cvs done.

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System   2009-03-09 19:49:04 EDT ---
rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc9

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System   2009-03-09 19:49:11 EDT ---
rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc10

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

Christoph Wickert  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert   2009-03-11 03:59:14 EDT ---
The package still crashes on x86_64 because MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME/LD_LIBRARY_PATH
are != /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9. That's why upstream added
rednotebook/files/default.cfg for packagers to customize that path. As a
downside, this package can no longer be noarch.

I suggest to 
- ether make the package arch-depended temporary or
- disable gtkmozembed for a while (useGTKMozembed=1)

The next version of the package will check for the location of xulrunner on
startup.

Please read http://www.gnomefiles.org/comment.php?soft_id=2450 for details.

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert   2009-03-11 04:27:39 EDT ---
You are buildrequiring desktop-file-utils, but you are not using them to
install or validate the desktop file.

When using desktop-file install, please "add-category="GTK;GNOME;Calendar;" in
order to allow nested menus.

Please use versioned (Build)Requires as the versions needed are pretty up to
date and prefent the package from being build on EPEL etc.:
python-devel >= 2.5
pygtk2-devel >= 2.13
PyYAML >= 3.05
gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 >= 2.19.1

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System   2009-03-11 13:56:23 EDT ---
rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update rednotebook'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-2576

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System   2009-03-11 14:00:06 EDT ---
rednotebook-0.6.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rednotebook'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2602

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System   2009-03-18 17:50:32 EDT ---
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc10

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System   2009-03-18 17:50:37 EDT ---
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc9

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System   2009-03-23 11:49:19 EDT ---
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rednotebook'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2892

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System   2009-03-23 11:58:43 EDT ---
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update rednotebook'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-2960

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System   2009-03-27 10:49:50 EDT ---
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |0.6.2-1.fc10
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System   2009-03-27 10:55:39 EDT ---
rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|0.6.2-1.fc10                |0.6.2-1.fc9

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #22 from Christoph Wickert   2009-03-27 11:24:57 EDT ---
FYI: 0.6.3 which fixes the bug I mentioned was released last weekend.

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #23 from Fabian Affolter   2009-03-28 17:56:21 EDT ---
Thanks

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

Fabian Affolter  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs+                 |fedora-cvs?

Bug 481428 depends on bug 439667, which changed state.

Bug 439667 Summary: gnome-python2-gtkmozembed python module crashes using example
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439667

What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #24 from Fabian Affolter  2011-07-14 11:43:48 EDT ---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: rednotebook
New Branches: el6
Owners: fab
InitialCC:

[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428

--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla  2011-07-14 19:35:58 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).